This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 09 Dec 21 11.37pm | |
---|---|
I'd like to state that, since the pandemic was declared, I have never said I will not have a vaccine. I have also never told anyone not to get vaccinated. I have never stated that the vaccines are "unsafe". I have never stated that I will not have a booster. I have never stated that masks should not be used, or that anyone should not use one. I do, however, believe that herd immunity is the only way forward. It always is. I'm really sorry loads of people have died/are going to die, but nature is cruel. We have an over-populated planet which we are polluting to death, nature is trying to balance the books. It almost reads like the religious texts. Plague, pestilence, floods....
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 09 Dec 21 11.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
You seem to be the only one who gets it. Tell someone a mask will protect them, and they will wear one, believing that, not only are they safe, they are not spreading their germs. Possibly infecting others. Distancing becomes irrelevant to them. If more expensive masks are the answer, then they need to be supplied to poorer people, or they will not be used. He doesn't "get it" at all. He constantly ignores the primary point. Social distancing is important, but in crowded spaces it can be imprecise and in some impossible. Wearing a mask won't stop air containing the virus being either breathed in, or out. That though isn't the point. A mask interrupts the passage of a heavy viral load. It stops you delivering it to others, and you receiving it from others. These though are just part of our community response, in which by far the most critical are the vaccines. Those who refuse them, without medical justification, even if they wear masks and socially distance, are letting us all down.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Dec 21 11.59pm | |
---|---|
- One of several occasions you stated this. Around the first of which, when I approved of the path that we ended up following (studies for safety and effectiveness then implementation), you accused me of reasoning that "unleashed Thalidomide on the world". There's no scope for sanitising such neglectful contributions, though eventually opting for the vaccine was the wise move and and acknowledgement of previous foolishness. Hopefully you will have the booster too. Treat yourself.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 10 Dec 21 12.11am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
I do, however, believe that herd immunity is the only way forward. It always is. I'm really sorry loads of people have died/are going to die, but nature is cruel. We have an over-populated planet which we are polluting to death, nature is trying to balance the books. It almost reads like the religious texts. Plague, pestilence, floods.... Vaccination is and has already been a pivotal part of the process of herd immunity.. or at least improved immunity against covid. Sure covid itself is also part of that, but some (not saying you) seem to have this strange idea that it's either/or. Clearly, for several demographics vaccination puts people in a much better position than simply catching covid out of the blue when they've never been exposed to it previously. Yes "nature is cruel" but science is wonderful and there's little point in many succumbing to bad decisions rather than necessity even if you do believe we're overpopulated and "nature is balancing the books". If someone gets cancer or some other terrible disease they don't tend to say "oh well my time has come", they attempt to do something about it. It's perfectly natural to make sensible decisions regarding your own health just as it is to criticise those acting in such a way that encourages people into making crap ones.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 10 Dec 21 12.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
- One of several occasions you stated this. Around the first of which, when I approved of the path that we ended up following (studies for safety and effectiveness then implementation), you accused me of reasoning that "unleashed Thalidomide on the world". There's no scope for sanitising such neglectful contributions, though eventually opting for the vaccine was the wise move and and acknowledgement of previous foolishness. Hopefully you will have the booster too. Treat yourself.
Not for the young. They are basically coercing them into vaccines that most of them don't need that might have unknown long term effects. Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Dec 2021 12.54am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 10 Dec 21 12.36am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Vaccination is and has already been a pivotal part of the process of herd immunity.. or at least improved immunity against covid. Sure covid itself is also part of that, but some (not saying you) seem to have this strange idea that it's either/or. Clearly, for several demographics vaccination puts people in a much better position than simply catching covid out of the blue when they've never been exposed to it previously. Yes "nature is cruel" but science is wonderful and there's little point in many succumbing to bad decisions rather than necessity even if you do believe we're overpopulated and "nature is balancing the books". If someone gets cancer or some other terrible disease they don't tend to say "oh well my time has come", they attempt to do something about it. It's perfectly natural to make sensible decisions regarding your own health just as it is to criticise those acting in such a way that encourages people into making crap ones.
It's hardly strange for someone to make their own healthcare decisions. Many people don't take up the flu vaccine even though they may not be particularly against it. Natural immunity is in of itself stronger than any individual vaccine and there will always be people not wishing to commitment themselves to a lifestyle and lifetime of vaccine jabs....the kill ratio being particularly low.....especially when it encourages the state to use it for the basis of many extremely insidious policies. People naturally want to fall into all or nothing groups, which rarely reflects reality. If you want to take the vaccine for others and wear your high quality mask for others then I have a certain amount of respect for that. However, we all make our own decisions....well, some aren't really being given practical choices and there's a lot of people shrugging their shoulders over that. Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Dec 2021 12.38am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 10 Dec 21 12.39am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Not for the young. They are basically coercing them into vaccines that most of them don't need that has unknown long term effects. Unless Tim is a child - which I don't deny is a possibility - it wasn't really meant in the broadest possible sense . As I said in the other post 'several demographics'. There are certain groups that benefit much less to the point of it possibly being pointless. The main argument for the very young being vaccinated was that it would stop them passing it on, but really to me it looks like significantly different variants are very likely to get passed on anyway, and it's more about stopping serious illness, something they have excelled at so far in the over 40s etc. I get that some disagree on who should be vaccinated and I intuitively think most kids are rife with covid due to the school environment and their lazy hygiene, and appreciate that once they catch it they accrue protection and are likely 'in the clear' for a bit.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 10 Dec 21 12.42am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
You seem to be the only one who gets it. Tell someone a mask will protect them, and they will wear one, believing that, not only are they safe, they are not spreading their germs. Possibly infecting others. Distancing becomes irrelevant to them. If more expensive masks are the answer, then they need to be supplied to poorer people, or they will not be used. Yep, if the figures are looked at that appears the easy answer to what happened. Indeed, if they actually believed it made a significant difference they would have ensured that only the top quality masks were allowed.....its main use is for social conformity.....they have a team of behavioural scientists but apparently few factor that in because they were sold on the concept. Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Dec 2021 12.43am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 10 Dec 21 12.45am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
I'd like to state that, since the pandemic was declared, I have never said I will not have a vaccine. I have also never told anyone not to get vaccinated. I have never stated that the vaccines are "unsafe". I have never stated that I will not have a booster. I have never stated that masks should not be used, or that anyone should not use one. I do, however, believe that herd immunity is the only way forward. It always is. I'm really sorry loads of people have died/are going to die, but nature is cruel. We have an over-populated planet which we are polluting to death, nature is trying to balance the books. It almost reads like the religious texts. Plague, pestilence, floods.... You talk utter rubbish. I was about to call you out for blatant lying regarding your stance on vaccine safety by searching back but BlueJay has kindly done this for me.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 10 Dec 21 12.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
- One of several occasions you stated this. Around the first of which, when I approved of the path that we ended up following (studies for safety and effectiveness then implementation), you accused me of reasoning that "unleashed Thalidomide on the world". There's no scope for sanitising such neglectful contributions, though eventually opting for the vaccine was the wise move and and acknowledgement of previous foolishness. Hopefully you will have the booster too. Treat yourself.
Why is it that you still cannot understand the difference between 'not safe' and 'unsafe'? A new vaccine cannot be deemed safe until such time as all factors are met, as in Thalidomide (which is still used today, although unsafe for pregnant women). Also, I didn't eventually opt for the vaccine, I never said I wouldn't have it. That was your imagination.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 10 Dec 21 12.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
The World Health Organistaion have reported zero deaths from the variant and the NHS has reported zero admissions for the variant - hardly "unsubstantiated dross and misinformation". The way you’re using those stats and your resultant stance and inference is in fact unsubstantiated dross and misinformation. The stats themselves are correct. But that’s not what I was debating.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 10 Dec 21 12.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Unless Tim is a child - which I don't deny is a possibility - it wasn't really meant in the broadest possible sense . As I said in the other post 'several demographics'. There are certain groups that benefit much less to the point of it possibly being pointless. The main argument for the very young being vaccinated was that it would stop them passing it on, but really to me it looks like significantly different variants are very likely to get passed on anyway, and it's more about stopping serious illness, something they have excelled at so far in the over 40s etc. I get that some disagree on who should be vaccinated and I intuitively think most kids are rife with covid due to the school environment and their lazy hygiene, and appreciate that once they catch it they accrue protection and are likely 'in the clear' for a bit. I don't know if it's accurate but I know in the video I linked to that surgeon talked about heart inflammation in the young and that even if there is a tiny risk to themselves that coercing them into vaccines, with no expression of risk....not telling them that there is no legal redress, not telling that long term effects are not known, isn't ethically sound. Everything in life is risk management and the young are very trusting. It was advised against medically and the government just told them to think again....I think that says it all. Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Dec 2021 12.50am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.