This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stuk Top half 23 Oct 18 4.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I believe he is a resident of Monocao so as long as he doesn't spend more than 90 days in the UK he will be taxed there. Correct. While the earnings will be in each country the tax won't necessarily be due there. In some places he will pay tax on the earnings made there, depending on that country's or state's (in the US, for example) tax laws.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 23 Oct 18 4.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
That's why it makes me sick when they fly the British flag!! Mo farah is another one. Just because you move country it doesn't mean you change nationality.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 23 Oct 18 5.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stuk
Just because you move country it doesn't mean you change nationality. Very true but if your moving to save tax then It basically saying "sod you lot" I'm going to keep all my money and not help the poorer with my tax. Very anti left!!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 23 Oct 18 5.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Why is trying to create fairness in the property market nonsense? At the end of the day we are a rich country, there is alot of wealth in London, so much so that ordinary people have been priced out, people on an average wage cannot get onto the property ladder, there is a chronic lack of social housing and homelessness is at record levels. So that imbalance needs to be redressed. No one is trying to bash the rich, just want to narrow that wealth gap and create a fairer, inclusive society for everyone Why are you and so many others so quick to defend the rich anyway? sounds like you've swallowed the same 'it's all the immigrants fault' pill. I agree with you regarding the housing problem but taxing the rich will not solve it. The left's answer is always to tax the rich. If you seriously think that will solve it, then give me some figures to back it up. How much money will it cost to build social housing and from your suggestions, how much money will these tax rises on the rich bring in? It is nonsense until you can back it up with figures and not populist rhetoric. Your sums do not add up.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 23 Oct 18 5.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Stop bailing-out privately owned banks with money borrowed (with interest!) from another privately owned bank (BoE) would be a start. We'd be in a far batter position now had we let the fookers rot 10yrs ago. But that's not the way the game is played. I agree with you, they should have been left to go under and bankers jailed but the government has now been paid back.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 23 Oct 18 5.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Why are you and so many others so quick to defend the rich anyway? sounds like you've swallowed the same 'it's all the immigrants fault' pill. Because the 'rich' contribute more than their fair share to the treasury – the top 1% fund 28% of the entire UK income tax revenue generated. They also provide innovation and jobs which helps our society better than any socialist government could. I don't hate the rich because I'm not a Marxist.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Pussay Patrol 23 Oct 18 5.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
I agree with you regarding the housing problem but taxing the rich will not solve it. The left's answer is always to tax the rich. If you seriously think that will solve it, then give me some figures to back it up. How much money will it cost to build social housing and from your suggestions, how much money will these tax rises on the rich bring in? It is nonsense until you can back it up with figures and not populist rhetoric. Your sums do not add up. I don't need to back it up with numbers, you merely have to apply basic logic. If central London is like a millionaires playground whilst at the same time ordinary people can't afford to buy a house, homelessness it rife and council waiting lists are 10 years long, there is imbalance. Too much money at the top, not enough at the bottom. Just redress the balance
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Penge Eagle Beckenham 23 Oct 18 6.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
I don't need to back it up with numbers, you merely have to apply basic logic. If central London is like a millionaires playground whilst at the same time ordinary people can't afford to buy a house, homelessness it rife and council waiting lists are 10 years long, there is imbalance. Too much money at the top, not enough at the bottom. Just redress the balance
You absolutely do need numbers. The magic money tree doesn't exist. Shouting problems and no workable solution, that needs to be based on facts and figures, is worthless.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Stuk Top half 23 Oct 18 7.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
Very true but if your moving to save tax then It basically saying "sod you lot" I'm going to keep all my money and not help the poorer with my tax. Very anti left!! The two things have no relevance to one another. You can be proud to be British but still think the tax system is terrible. I don't think any state should be able to take half of anyone's earnings, especially when they're so terrible at using it in any kind of efficient or effective way. And seeing as he's not taking anything out of the system, at all, why should he help fund it? Even though he'll still actually be paying far more into the UK system than 90% of people.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 23 Oct 18 7.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Stop bailing-out privately owned banks with money borrowed (with interest!) from another privately owned bank (BoE) would be a start. We'd be in a far batter position now had we let the fookers rot 10yrs ago. But that's not the way the game is played. They should've let Northern Rock go, then the others would never have got into the situations they did. And even if they did, sod them too. They should also take a leaf out of the USA's book too and give the fines to the treasury rather than the s*** system the FCA has over here, which effectively gives it back to other banks.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 23 Oct 18 8.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
You absolutely do need numbers. The magic money tree doesn't exist. Shouting problems and no workable solution, that needs to be based on facts and figures, is worthless. Ah yes the magic money tree This magic money tree? [Link]
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 23 Oct 18 8.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stuk
The two things have no relevance to one another. You can be proud to be British but still think the tax system is terrible. I don't think any state should be able to take half of anyone's earnings, especially when they're so terrible at using it in any kind of efficient or effective way. And seeing as he's not taking anything out of the system, at all, why should he help fund it? Even though he'll still actually be paying far more into the UK system than 90% of people. didn't this country give him the freedom and opportunity to be able to take up the sport and made him the person he is?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.