This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 09 Dec 21 12.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
I used to 'Face Fit' employees on building sites. This will probably mean nothing to you, but research it. You know nothing about respirators. Hysterics do not make you correct. I trust the data, the methodology and the research. Not your anecdotes. Gases and odours are not the same as aerosols and large droplets. Simply stating you face fit employees does not discredit the point I am making, via others detailed analysis. While gainful employment, it also sounds incredibly boring.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 09 Dec 21 12.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
I did say that. But what did the rest of that post have to do with mask wearing? You rambled on about booster jabs. Last time I checked this was a thread about all things related to ‘rona. Including masks and boosters.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Dec 21 12.57am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
As you know I think the whole mask thing is just government using social conformity via fear to support its increasingly authoritarian covid policies....but there you go. I will also wear masks where I'm asked to....I just regard it as nonsense....I suppose the only difference there is that you think you're making a difference...if more perhaps as a moral contribution whereas I view that as strictly theoretical and largely imagined. In a free society this sight difference in perspective wouldn't be remarkable at all, but today it impacts on someone's free movement inside their own country. Certainly the lower the quality of mask the less useful it is. There are more than enough studies to know conclusively that high quality masks are very effective.. Several studies in hospital settings put that beyond doubt. If anyone in vulnerable they would benefit from wearing one in travel and supermarket environment, and if anyone interested in protecting them they should do the same.
Edited by BlueJay (09 Dec 2021 1.37am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 09 Dec 21 1.01am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
I trust the data, the methodology and the research. Not your anecdotes. Gases and odours are not the same as aerosols and large droplets. Simply stating you face fit employees does not discredit the point I am making, via others detailed analysis. While gainful employment, it also sounds incredibly boring. Trust what you like pal. Just don't tell people that FFP2 masks significantly reduce the chance of getting Covid. Because they don't. Almost all work is incredibly boring. But face fitting is only a tiny fraction of what I did, and was light relief from some other duties I may have been doing.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Dec 21 1.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
You rambled on about booster jabs. Rather you rambled on about not having one. You have history of having a bizarre attitude towards vaccination, where you essentially 'hid' the fact that you had been vaccinated (cries of invasion of privacy!) on account of being embarrassed you'd previously repeatedly said they'd be 'unsafe'. I was simply highlighting that taking someone to task about the rights and wrongs of masks (when they're not wrong anyway), close to announcing that you haven't had a booster, like you're Rambo or something doesn't make an awful lot of sense. The science is firmly in favour of getting the booster, so if you've had the other two then you should. Who knows maybe you will and haven't got around to it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Dec 21 1.11am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Trust what you like pal. Just don't tell people that FFP2 masks significantly reduce the chance of getting Covid. Because they don't. Almost all work is incredibly boring. But face fitting is only a tiny fraction of what I did, and was light relief from some other duties I may have been doing. There's plenty of science of favour of both FFP2 and FFP3 masks making a difference. Something you've just admitted you don't care about anyway. If he wants to tell people that, that's what he'll be doing.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 09 Dec 21 1.18am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Trust what you like pal. Just don't tell people that FFP2 masks significantly reduce the chance of getting Covid. Because they don't. Almost all work is incredibly boring. But face fitting is only a tiny fraction of what I did, and was light relief from some other duties I may have been doing. They reduce the chance of you getting high viral load, and therefore by extension depending on scenario, COVID. As evident the viral load point is more relevant and what I stated in bold. Pal. And I’ve read some more on your advice. In Covid context, the micron size that offers the most threat is in the 20-30 range, according to a 2020 study. Below that particles carry very little or no virus. FFP2 and N95s block ~90% of particles well below that size. It’s that simple. ~90% might not be acceptable for silica which can go as small as 0.1 microns. But particles that can be absorbed or evaporate are very different to silica. As you should know. Science innit
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 09 Dec 21 1.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Rather you rambled on about not having one. You have history of having a bizarre attitude towards vaccination, where you essentially 'hid' the fact that you had been vaccinated (cries of invasion of privacy!) on account of being embarrassed you'd previously said they were 'unsafe' for an age. I was simply highlighting that taking someone to task about the rights and wrongs of masks (when they're not wrong anyway), close to announcing that you haven't had a booster, like you're Rambo or something doesn't make an awful lot of sense. The science is firmly in favour of getting the booster, so if you've had the other two then you should. Who knows maybe you will.
Glad to see that I remembered correctly.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Dec 21 1.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Glad to see that I remembered correctly. Maybe this thread is a protracted, low budget sequel to Ghost where the vaccine has caused so much carnage that Tim is communicating through the spirit world. Thankfully I don't own a pottery wheel.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Vaibow vancouver/croydon 09 Dec 21 1.39am | |
---|---|
I think at this stage, those that are happy to continue with this, always will... For me, it's obvious something is not quite right, there is a clear agenda at play here, wether it's corruption and money or a global plot to reshape society, either way, it baffles me to think 2 years later, all the measures and sacrifices and we are in a worse place. it's easier to fool someone than it is to convince them they were fooled, wether it's masks, lockdowns for 2 weeks, jabs (1,2,3 and now 4) and now QR codes.
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 09 Dec 21 1.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Certainly the lower the quality of mask the less useful it is. There are more than enough studies to know conclusively that high quality masks are very effective.. Several studies in hospital settings put that beyond doubt. If anyone in vulnerable they would benefit from wearing one in travel and supermarket environment, and if anyone interested in protecting them they should do the same. I agree on surgical masks, though that's a relatively expensive habit and likely unrealistic nationally. Also, it's 'one use and throw' and requires you not touching your face and so on....I tip my hat to your dedication but that's not for me....I'll keep a reasonable distance and not engage in long conversations....you know, copying my dating techniques as a teenager. I don't think most infection is happening in supermarkets or such places like that unless it's packed but rather how much social distancing is built into the culture and behaviour If we look at home settings for example where people spend more than a little time interacting and thus gaining viral load how packed and what the attitude is towards personal space is going to matter. Originally posted by BlueJay
You'll not find many as suspicious of government than me and they are in so many regards authoritarian (regarding clamping down on protests, snowden type revelations, and more). Certainly some covid measures tick that box, but I think there's a danger of just viewing 'anything' done at this time through that lens of suspicion, when I'm not sure that's always useful or the case. People fall into ill fitting batches of beliefs (such as suspicious of vaccination) which often make other outcomes that they are against 'more likely' to happen (lockdowns).
Governments talk to each other and act in unison where they wish to....the whole 'build back better' has been a chorus with little individualism as separate states. No sooner have Austria started mandatory vaccinations we hear the media asking the government about the same here and the government refusing to deny it's under consideration......that's called testing the water....and there are plenty of 'good blokes' like WE ready to clap them on. Damn right I'm suspicious. I guess we will see what comes out of the government over these next few weeks. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Dec 2021 1.53am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Dec 21 1.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Vaibow
I think at this stage, those that are happy to continue with this, always will... For me, it's obvious something is not quite right, there is a clear agenda at play here, wether it's corruption and money or a global plot to reshape society, either way, it baffles me to think 2 years later, all the measures and sacrifices and we are in a worse place. it's easier to fool someone than it is to convince them they were fooled, wether it's masks, lockdowns for 2 weeks, jabs (1,2,3 and now 4) and now QR codes. I don't think it's useful to bundle everything in together. I think that's part of the problem. For instance if we hadn't bothered with vaccinations clearly we'd have had a much higher hospitalisation and death count, which is turn would have disrupted society more. Instead I view that as having put us in a much better position for Omicron. We've could've had a do nothing approach like Brazil, but of course 600k deaths in and they suddenly decided that mass vaccination was a great idea, and are in a recession despite no lockdowns. Much of what we're facing is due to the nature of what we're dealing with. It's certainly an opportunity for corporations and governments in some regards (in part because they can ride out storms that small businesses can't), and as they say 'never let a tragedy go to waste', but a significant part of what is happening was inevitable. I was against lockdowns after the first because of the impact on businesses etc, but I'm certainly not against trying to enhance immunity in the safest way possible (vaccinations) to help protect people.
Edited by BlueJay (09 Dec 2021 1.51am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.