This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
steeleye20 Croydon 16 Oct 18 12.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
Do we have open boarders to the rest of the world. YES OR NO? Hopefully not, as that is simply inviting unskilled people who could not replace our EU workers many who do a vital job.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 16 Oct 18 12.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Well actually obviously house prices would go down because there would be more supply and hence less demand. Foreigners make up none of the Police so obviously and the children of immigrants make up only a small minority....So obviously the ratio of Police to public would improve automatically. Foreign staff is at one in ten in the NHS so that would have an impact but we don't want to get rid of some skilled immigration anyway.....We just want to start the serious process of actually training our own now.....Not brain draining other countries. The Councils shouldn't be employing non British unless they have to either. OK I get it, the rise in house prices has nothing to do with the lack of housebuilding, legislation, ease of borrowing / low interest rates. It's all the immigrants fault. The NHS struggling has nothing to do with people living longer, the obesity crisis, cuts or mismanagement. It's all the immigrants fault. Less Police has nothing to with 20,000 less police due to cuts. It's all the immigrants fault
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 16 Oct 18 12.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
OK I get it, the rise in house prices has nothing to do with the lack of housebuilding, legislation, ease of borrowing / low interest rates. It's all the immigrants fault. The NHS struggling has nothing to do with people living longer, the obesity crisis, cuts or mismanagement. It's all the immigrants fault. Less Police has nothing to with 20,000 less police due to cuts. It's all the immigrants fault Have you got selective hearing (reading) It's not the immigrants fault it the policies of the politicians. Why invite minions when we arnt building enough houses Why isnt the NHS training our own nurses!! 20000 less police, I agree it's wrong with a rising population. Our government has taken the cheap lazy option to import cheap labour to get growth. I repeat not the immigrants fault.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 16 Oct 18 12.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Well actually obviously house prices would go down because there would be more supply and hence less demand. Foreigners make up none of the Police so obviously and the children of immigrants make up only a small minority....So obviously the ratio of Police to public would improve automatically. Foreign staff is at one in ten in the NHS so that would have an impact but we don't want to get rid of some skilled immigration anyway.....We just want to start the serious process of actually training our own now.....Not brain draining other countries. The Councils shouldn't be employing non British unless they have to either. I often wondered why politicians say that low paid foreign workers actually benefit the country so recently I used a benefits calculator to get an idea of cost. Of course these are assumptions and you can argue whether my assumptions are correct but I still think you will arrive at a similar conclusion that it costs the taxpayer a lot of money. I used a benefits calculator from Citizens Advice these were my assumptions: I am a young married man with a wife who doesn't work because she looks after our 2 children 1 of which is under 5. I earn the minimum wage and work a 35 hour week so my salary is 14-15k. I privately rent a 3 bedroom house in London which costs me £500 per week. After my personal tax allowance I pay £300 pa income tax plus a few hundred for National Insurance I pay £1500 pa council tax bottom line I contribute £2-3k pa to the Treasury. According to the calculator I am entitled to Universal Credit benefits of: £20k pa In other words I cost the taxpayer net 18k pa and that doesn't include the 4k I maybe entitled to for child care although she is currently looking after them. The cost does not include education, healthcare and other public services which presumably I and my family would use. Now you may argue the salary is too low or the rent too high, feel free to do your own calculations, but I think it is clear it costs the taxpayer a lot of money. Now if it is for a care worker in the NHS that may well be worth it but if Starbucks wants staff ?
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 16 Oct 18 1.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I often wondered why politicians say that low paid foreign workers actually benefit the country so recently I used a benefits calculator to get an idea of cost. Of course these are assumptions and you can argue whether my assumptions are correct but I still think you will arrive at a similar conclusion that it costs the taxpayer a lot of money. I used a benefits calculator from Citizens Advice these were my assumptions: I am a young married man with a wife who doesn't work because she looks after our 2 children 1 of which is under 5. I earn the minimum wage and work a 35 hour week so my salary is 14-15k. I privately rent a 3 bedroom house in London which costs me £500 per week. After my personal tax allowance I pay £300 pa income tax plus a few hundred for National Insurance I pay £1500 pa council tax bottom line I contribute £2-3k pa to the Treasury. According to the calculator I am entitled to Universal Credit benefits of: £20k pa In other words I cost the taxpayer net 18k pa and that doesn't include the 4k I maybe entitled to for child care although she is currently looking after them. The cost does not include education, healthcare and other public services which presumably I and my family would use. Now you may argue the salary is too low or the rent too high, feel free to do your own calculations, but I think it is clear it costs the taxpayer a lot of money. Now if it is for a care worker in the NHS that may well be worth it but if Starbucks wants staff ?
Who is this person and what is actually your point, you are obviously from the Matt Hancock school of not having any connection as a tory of what these people do. They do not claim benefits. They work hard mostly doing jobs no Uk person would even consider, as it is beneath them. I have been in this building 5 years and have never seen one British worker, not one. Universal Credit? Benefits calculator? What is the Romanian for WTF ?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 16 Oct 18 1.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Who is this person and what is actually your point, you are obviously from the Matt Hancock school of not having any connection as a tory of what these people do. They do not claim benefits. They work hard mostly doing jobs no Uk person would even consider, as it is beneath them. I have been in this building 5 years and have never seen one British worker, not one. Universal Credit? Benefits calculator? What is the Romanian for WTF ?
Everyone is voicing their point and you just reject everything.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 16 Oct 18 1.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I often wondered why politicians say that low paid foreign workers actually benefit the country so recently I used a benefits calculator to get an idea of cost. Of course these are assumptions and you can argue whether my assumptions are correct but I still think you will arrive at a similar conclusion that it costs the taxpayer a lot of money. I used a benefits calculator from Citizens Advice these were my assumptions: I am a young married man with a wife who doesn't work because she looks after our 2 children 1 of which is under 5. I earn the minimum wage and work a 35 hour week so my salary is 14-15k. I privately rent a 3 bedroom house in London which costs me £500 per week. After my personal tax allowance I pay £300 pa income tax plus a few hundred for National Insurance I pay £1500 pa council tax bottom line I contribute £2-3k pa to the Treasury. According to the calculator I am entitled to Universal Credit benefits of: £20k pa In other words I cost the taxpayer net 18k pa and that doesn't include the 4k I maybe entitled to for child care although she is currently looking after them. The cost does not include education, healthcare and other public services which presumably I and my family would use. Now you may argue the salary is too low or the rent too high, feel free to do your own calculations, but I think it is clear it costs the taxpayer a lot of money. Now if it is for a care worker in the NHS that may well be worth it but if Starbucks wants staff ?
How does replacing the foreign worker with a British worker resolve that problem?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 16 Oct 18 1.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
Everyone is voicing their point and you just reject everything. 'Do you think the government has handled our country responsibly?' D the tories ? Responsible? In fairness D I have been thinking, based on the litany of failed projects which are just normal now, that no government is capable of delivering any project on time and in budget.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 16 Oct 18 1.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
How does replacing the foreign worker with a British worker resolve that problem? The British worker is already here and we have a responsibility to them first. As for vital public service roles rather than pay low wages and subside them with benefits how about we just pay better wages.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyboy1978 16 Oct 18 1.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
How does replacing the foreign worker with a British worker resolve that problem? If you times it by 2 million foreign workers and don't increase infrastructure or services you have a problem. It's not the one worker which you simpistically describe. It's scale of economy.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 16 Oct 18 1.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
The British worker is already here and we have a responsibility to them first. As for vital public service roles rather than pay low wages and subside them with benefits how about we just pay better wages. Indeed we simply must pay people a proper living wage, at least.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 16 Oct 18 2.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
The British worker is already here and we have a responsibility to them first. As for vital public service roles rather than pay low wages and subside them with benefits how about we just pay better wages. I agree on most of that because in effect the debate is, as it should be, moving away from immigration. Really if it's becoming an economic debate we should look at purely those that contribute to the economy and those that don't whoever ever they may be. I'd hazard a guess that if you separated those that are net contributors and net takers, in the latter category how many are non UK, if that number was not even 5% or at the most 10%, how much strong is the immigration argument then?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.