This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 07 Dec 21 10.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
There were times when businesses were closed unnecessarily. Whereas now we’re in a period of short term uncertainty. If all sorts of people were denied healthcare because most unvaccinated are waiting for I don’t know when then there aren’t many options to choose from. I’m talking leisure and entertainment. I don’t agree with mandatory vaccinations but the longer this goes on and the NHS cannot do what it’s there to do then I won’t be surprised. I doubt I’ll even hear a moan about it but if I did I’d probably ask what did you expect? None of it ultimately bothers me in the slightest. It bothers the ‘’I won’t get vaccinated’’ rather than anti-vax on twitter the most, although they have a point regarding those who don’t care about their health, and they’ve had since March 2020 to lose weight or get healthier. We could increase NI by 5% and import thousands of nurses to get round all this. I'll look at the vaccines again in the new year but from what I've heard I'm probably going to be more interested in the monoclonal antibodies. Still, I can't see myself ever going with the mandatory stuff and punishments for personal healthcare choices. Anyway I've been waffling on about this stuff for what feels like forever.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 07 Dec 21 10.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I’ve seen that the other way round is ultimately the best. I can certainly see why that would be the case for antibody levels. My thinking would be that for those who are significantly impacted by covid, it would be better to be vaccinated first to take the edge off things. As in those hospitalised have very high antibody levels but it also screwed their health over, possibly more than we even realise yet. Interestingly I got covid after one jab, and around the time of the second. So I guess that's a half way house. I had my booster jab recently so should be in about the best position possible to combat what comes next. In several studies two jabs and a booster jab drastically increased antibody levels, and not to mention T cell immunity which plays an important role even when there is significant immune escape.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 07 Dec 21 10.59pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Particularly annoying right now as things evolve, drag on and being in a short term period of uncertainty. And this is both sides of the argument. Yes, it does all get a bit all or nothing in peoples view of it one way and the other. Nobody really knows what twists and turns are coming. We can only try to best position ourselves, and hopefully steer clear of shutdowns and the like. Through vaccination and not insignificant natural infection (maybe 100k a day of late - which really is a good thing where hospitalisations are low) we should at least be building a significant amount of resilient over time.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 07 Dec 21 11.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I'll look at the vaccines again in the new year but from what I've heard I'm probably going to be more interested in the monoclonal antibodies. Still, I can't see myself ever going with the mandatory stuff and punishments for personal healthcare choices. Anyway I've been waffling on about this stuff for what feels like forever. Not unless you get so badly infected that you require hospitalisation, by which time you could have infected many others and be using NHS resources that could have been avoided had you been vaccinated. Great result, especially as these don't have nearly so much safety evidence as the vaccines now do. Be sensible, do your duty to the rest of us and go and get vaccinated. Your shoulder will thank you for it. So will I and my cancer. So will my wife and her over-worked colleagues, who are receiving unvaccinated patients, sick with covid, every day.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 07 Dec 21 11.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
New study out – FFP2, medical and 3+ layer masks significantly reduce the chance of getting COVID. Don't be a mug, when in a relevant scenario, wear one. If you're one of the morons that are still wearing a mask fashioned out of your old cotton shirt and silly string, don't bother. Upgrade. For the paranoid anti-authoritarians, natural selection should do its job this time around. Fcuk me, you're a card. "Don't be a mug", "morons" "paranoid anti-authoritarians". Crikey they got you scared. Incidentally, FFP2 masks do not pass building site regs for silica dust. And you can see that dust. So there is absolutely no chance of one blocking a virus. Just saying.
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 07 Dec 21 11.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Not unless you get so badly infected that you require hospitalisation, by which time you could have infected many others and be using NHS resources that could have been avoided had you been vaccinated. Great result, especially as these don't have nearly so much safety evidence as the vaccines now do. Be sensible, do your duty to the rest of us and go and get vaccinated. Your shoulder will thank you for it. So will I and my cancer. So will my wife and her over-worked colleagues, who are receiving unvaccinated patients, sick with covid, every day.
'Do your duty'. You ain't worthy of saying those words. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Dec 2021 11.24pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 08 Dec 21 8.06am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
'Do your duty'. You ain't worthy of saying those words. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Dec 2021 11.24pm) That's a no, then! With attitudes like this, is it any wonder that I anticipate increasing levels of exclusion, where practical to do so, from areas where people gather, for those who refuse vaccination.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 08 Dec 21 8.27am | |
---|---|
Quick poll, who wears a mask whilst attending the match? I think I saw maybe one or two at the last game in the bar and seats around. Funnily enough there were more than that wearing them outside the ground.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 08 Dec 21 10.02am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Fcuk me, you're a card. "Don't be a mug", "morons" "paranoid anti-authoritarians". Crikey they got you scared. Incidentally, FFP2 masks do not pass building site regs for silica dust. And you can see that dust. So there is absolutely no chance of one blocking a virus. Just saying. Christ. If you think the point of a functioning mask is to prevent ALL particles getting through, you need to do some more reading. Also – Scared? Personally I couldn't give a rats ass if I get COVID these days based on the high likelihood any infection will be mild or asymptomatic. The reason I choose to wear a mask is mainly for others, the Eastern Cultural approach – not everyone has the ability to work from home or still earn if they're forced to stay home for 10 days. Sometimes not being a selfish, grandstanding tool benefits others so they don't lose their job or fail to pay the heating bill. And yes, FFP2 masks are nowhere near as efficient as N95s, but they're not that accessible to the everyday population are they? Further, the point of masks that offer at least some protection, is to at least offer some protection. Not to act as a vacuum. It's about reducing the amount of viral load that does get through rather than eliminating it completely, which is impossible unless you're planning on wearing a scuba mask and a tank of oxygen. N95 masks are excellent but you can't wear them for long periods of time as they do, in fact, start to limit airflow to the point of becoming problematic. Further, even they will let through silica, just in small enough amounts not to be an issue in whatever test they use to determine regs. Also – I may be wrong as I haven't got the time to trawl back through this thread, but didn't you rail against the vaccine then end up taking it? I'd rather read a qualified quantitive study than sully my brain with unobjective rants. So don't be a selfish moron, understand the detail, be objective and follow the science.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 08 Dec 21 2.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Christ. If you think the point of a functioning mask is to prevent ALL particles getting through, you need to do some more reading. Also – Scared? Personally I couldn't give a rats ass if I get COVID these days based on the high likelihood any infection will be mild or asymptomatic. The reason I choose to wear a mask is mainly for others, the Eastern Cultural approach – not everyone has the ability to work from home or still earn if they're forced to stay home for 10 days. Sometimes not being a selfish, grandstanding tool benefits others so they don't lose their job or fail to pay the heating bill. And yes, FFP2 masks are nowhere near as efficient as N95s, but they're not that accessible to the everyday population are they? Further, the point of masks that offer at least some protection, is to at least offer some protection. Not to act as a vacuum. It's about reducing the amount of viral load that does get through rather than eliminating it completely, which is impossible unless you're planning on wearing a scuba mask and a tank of oxygen. N95 masks are excellent but you can't wear them for long periods of time as they do, in fact, start to limit airflow to the point of becoming problematic. Further, even they will let through silica, just in small enough amounts not to be an issue in whatever test they use to determine regs. Also – I may be wrong as I haven't got the time to trawl back through this thread, but didn't you rail against the vaccine then end up taking it? I'd rather read a qualified quantitive study than sully my brain with unobjective rants. So don't be a selfish moron, understand the detail, be objective and follow the science. Even though we rarely quite agree, I normally quite enjoy your infrequent postings.....Well actually I still like the forthrightness here even if these insults apply to the likes of me. However obviously I differ.....but lets not go on about why as it's been laboured over for a good percent of these over thousand pages. I've argued against all the points you've made here and provided links and so on but we all know that our respective minds are made up (though I will look again). I have to say though, you really don't like the lower orders do you SW?....it's almost like IQ nationalism, something I also have an inclination towards but just not with quite your emotive drive. Also, I have to say, it does seem that if you were a stick of rock and they broke you in two the insides would read, 'Blair Voter'. Edited by Stirlingsays (08 Dec 2021 3.16pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 08 Dec 21 5.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That's a no, then! With attitudes like this, is it any wonder that I anticipate increasing levels of exclusion, where practical to do so, from areas where people gather, for those who refuse vaccination. Which being the authoritarian you are you will fully support. Two years ago people were called conspiracy theorists for accurately predicting what is happening now....and the people who once called them conspiracy theorists are happily cheering it on.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 08 Dec 21 5.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Fcuk me, you're a card. "Don't be a mug", "morons" "paranoid anti-authoritarians". Crikey they got you scared. Incidentally, FFP2 masks do not pass building site regs for silica dust. And you can see that dust. So there is absolutely no chance of one blocking a virus. Just saying. FFP2 block out about 95% of aerosols , FFP3 99%, and so the latter is better, but the former is much better than the average crappy mask, especially if viral load and the like factor in. To my mind it only applies to environments where, say, the elderly potentially 'have to' go, like super markets and transport. There is an aspect of community spirit to doing your best by others in those environments.
This isn't an argument about getting vaccinated, as I get that the odd person just won't come what may. It's more that if you're going to go down the vaccination route it's best to do so in a way that is effective and rational. As those of various schools of thought have pointed out, many of us are bound to catch covid anyway (indeed many of us have), which in turn will provide additional immunity. It's all about putting yourself, others and the NHS in the best position possible should that happen. Edited by BlueJay (08 Dec 2021 5.20pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.