it took Yugoslavia 5 years before things got better.

And it has taken Northern Ireland about 400 years. As for Rwanda, things are much better there than previously.

In all cases 'getting better' is often a temporary situation. The underlying ingredients for civil strife being a permanent fixture.

700 AD to 1493. The Multicultural idyll, the Paradise, of Al-Andaluz ( Andalucia, Southern Spain ) is a fantasy pedaled by the BBC. It never really existed.

Do not be surprised if they also had nutters stabbing & decapitating 'Kuffirs'. It was a Two-Tier Society. As prescribed in the Holy Book.

[Link]

Edited by PalazioVecchio (07 Aug 2024 9.34am)

Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Lets hope all their gas appliances are fit for use.

I disengage, I turn the page.

"I'm applying for asylum"

"Approved"

That was easy.

One more point

I am confused. Who do you think I “sympathise” with?

The local people I was referring to were those in the colonies. Not in Europe.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I like to return to the issue of these “global elites” and their agenda which somehow manages to direct world affairs.

That there are super rich people who look after their own interests is undeniable. They exist, and have always existed. If you want to brand them as the “elite” that’s your choice, but I don’t think it’s accurate. They aren’t one class.

What is denied is there is some kind of agenda that they share. The original comment referred to “their agenda” and this is either stated, or implied, in all the sneering from the right, as they attack the “elites”, the WEF and globalism.

There is no agenda or even shared aspirations. People like Putin, Russian oligarchs, George Soros, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Rupert Murdoch and the Rothchilds would all be regarded as “elites” but each has their own, sometimes tangentially different, agenda.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

It won’t be the last time I reply to you, so get used to it. Whether you read it now, or in the future, is of little consequence to me. What’s important that the nonsense is countered so that the lurkers and casual visitors know that other opinions exist. I write for them. Not for you.

What you said was that a lot of migrants come here to promote extremism. It isn’t true because it cannot be true.

No one would seek to deny that extremism isn’t an issue which must be dealt with but to extend that to wanting to halt all immigration and then send those who are already here “home”, which is what the tone of your ceaseless posts on the subject imply, is simply ridiculous. It’s scaremongering nonsense which results in the type of events we have seen this week.

Criminals exist in every community. They always have. Their rational changes as society changes but our determination to find them doesn’t. Religion based extremism is a scourge on us which must be eliminated through ruthless pursuit of those who encourage it and the education of the upcoming generations.

It’s not revolutionary. It will require determination and bravery. It will take time. But it must be done.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.