Another daft statement.

There is no justification for the censorship of political opinions unless they incite violence. There are always grey areas, of course, but the kind of blatant suppression of legitimate concerns and promotion of a one sided agenda is unacceptable.
We have seen how violence from one demographic is tolerated while those opposing it are vilified and persecuted.

You are oblivious to all of this, of course.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (07 Sep 2021 3.40pm)

There is no censorship of political opinions, whether they incite violence, or not. There are standards and rules applied by the owners of some social media businesses. Which is their absolute right.

No-one has a right to plaster their political messaging on your walls. Only on their own, or somewhere which offers unrestricted access.

Only illegal acts are restricted by law. So when alternative platforms exist, every opinion has an outlet.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

That does not make it right or balanced.

If you seriously claim that media outlets don't tell their target audience what they want to hear and often try to tell them how to think, then you are utterly bereft of any level of insight.

I didn't pass any comment on whether it is balanced.

It's the right of private media businesses, of all kinds, to decide for themselves how to respond to their target consumers. Ultimately, their purpose is, or ought to be, making money for their owners. Although Rupert Murdoch, Viscount Rothermere and Fred Barclay seem to have other ideas.

Unless you want to restrict everyone, with control resting in Whitehall, then you cannot restrict anyone.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

But the BBC is publicly funded and as such is expected to uphold standards of balance and unbiased reporting
which on many occasions recently it has not.

Privately funded outlets can report virtually anything they like eg Daily Mirror or Daily Express

Spot on

Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.