It's important to diversify in business. There's a lot of money in smelting.

It's not the structural content of the joke itself it's often the reaction it can illicit, for which you have played a perfect part there Maple, kudos.

Try not to imagine a slack jawed, yokel's guffaw of the statement itself but the impact on someone who takes themselves so seriously they have lost all sense of humour in any guise, to the extent they do not even realise they are a mere puppet on a string for others with a far more palpable grip on reality's existence.

And as for context, this is a football forum, not The Hague, the context is most certainly apt for a childish chuckle. You only demean yourself by elevating it to a level at which it is to be taken so seriously and literally.

I'd also add, according to a source of mine, that she is in fact a 'slag', cos he heard she was bunking off school once because she was gonna go down the wimbley and get off with Luke Griffiths, only she never because he's been trying to grow a moustache but it just looks like pubes, so she got off with Luke Torbet instead, only don't tell Bethany that because she's fancied Luke Torbet ever since she flashed her fanny at him during Home Ec'.

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

I do not no.

And if what you are saying is indeed true, I like to think I've at the very least provided some levity on the thread, I do like to from time to time but would be aghast if I had accidentally, genuinely riled someone to any serious extent in meaning to do so.

Cheer up all, we're gonna win 2-1 on Saturday

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

I wasn't outraged at the joke, let alone "perpetual outrage". I was more questioning the fact that people were outraged at the act of defence of a spouse. You know, like you are outraged by his violence. But this has nothing to do with this thread. It's whataboutery. Again.

You constantly divert from the topic. If you post anything valid, I'll reply, otherwise, don't bother. Idiot.

Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

I see where you are coming from, and understand the 'popularity' angle, but what has happened here is not illegal. I get that it appears unethical, but if the system allows it, get the system changed, don't hate on the people who use the system.

Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Now why didn't we think of that before. Silly us.