This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Jan 22 11.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Well, you and everyone else won't be vaccinated for that much longer and this rather strange way of viewing the world will be all very temporary. Viewing the world as an interdependent entity, where an individual's decisions impact everyone else, where health services are stretched to breaking point, so need protection from the selfish isn't the least strange. What's strange is how some people refuse to acknowledge this. This will last as long as it needs to last. The expectation being that once herd immunity is established we will all be offered annual covid vaccinations alongside the flu one. We can then ignore those who refused to participate in the national effort. Ignore, but never forget. If it was down to me, I would make it a legitimate reason for employers to discriminate when reviewing job applications. If an applicant had refused the Covid vaccine, without a medical exemption, then they would likely do so again should a future pandemic occur, thus risking being off work more frequently and threatening the welfare of others. Everything else being equal I would rather employ someone who demonstrates responsibility by being vaccinated than someone who doesn't. So I think it's a reasonable question to ask.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 16 Jan 22 11.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
If it was down to me, I would make it a legitimate reason for employers to discriminate when reviewing job applications. It is and I have. Only discrimination due to protected characteristics is illegal
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 16 Jan 22 11.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Viewing the world as an interdependent entity, where an individual's decisions impact everyone else, where health services are stretched to breaking point, so need protection from the selfish isn't the least strange. What's strange is how some people refuse to acknowledge this. This will last as long as it needs to last. The expectation being that once herd immunity is established we will all be offered annual covid vaccinations alongside the flu one. We can then ignore those who refused to participate in the national effort. Ignore, but never forget. If it was down to me, I would make it a legitimate reason for employers to discriminate when reviewing job applications. If an applicant had refused the Covid vaccine, without a medical exemption, then they would likely do so again should a future pandemic occur, thus risking being off work more frequently and threatening the welfare of others. Everything else being equal I would rather employ someone who demonstrates responsibility by being vaccinated than someone who doesn't. So I think it's a reasonable question to ask. Well, it's great that feck all is down to you isn't it. Because if things were down to me, little old you wouldn't be too chuffed about stuff either.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Jan 22 11.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
It is and I have. Only discrimination due to protected characteristics is illegal Good to know. I wonder how important this will become in the coming years.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 16 Jan 22 11.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Well, it's great that feck all is down to you isn't it. Because if things were down to me, little old you wouldn't be too chuffed about stuff either. From what we've just be told it doesn't need to be down to me! It already is.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 16 Jan 22 11.46pm | |
---|---|
As far as I'm aware there has been no change to legislation over vaccination and employment. When it comes to tribunals I imagine in the current atmosphere that care-homes would be seen more favourably in this matter over other jobs.....obviously not employing someone being far easier to muddy than cutting current staff. I would imagine that this isn't an area that government would wish to dip its toes into.....as the lawyers would have a field day. Authoritarian fantasists can dream whatever dreams they wish....unless a virus or variant turns up that worries government considerably more than the strongest versions of covid then they are unlikely to get their wish.....they should have learnt something from the recent Tory rebellion....Government MPs are obviously not happy with the route that he so obviously desires. It shows up all the waffle they waffled over the NHS for what it is....because such a requirement would see very important staff, who can't just be replaced, sacked and that....in my view, that would not only be idiotic but disastrous. Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Jan 2022 11.50pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 17 Jan 22 12.12am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
As far as I'm aware there has been no change to legislation over vaccination and employment. When it comes to tribunals I imagine in the current atmosphere that care-homes would be seen more favourably in this matter over other jobs.....obviously not employing someone being far easier to muddy than cutting current staff. I would imagine that this isn't an area that government would wish to dip its toes into.....as the lawyers would have a field day. Authoritarian fantasists can dream whatever dreams they wish....unless a virus or variant turns up that worries government considerably more than the strongest versions of covid then they are unlikely to get their wish.....they should have learnt something from the recent Tory rebellion....Government MPs are obviously not happy with the route that he so obviously desires. It shows up all the waffle they waffled over the NHS for what it is....because such a requirement would see very important staff, who can't just be replaced, sacked and that....in my view, that would not only be idiotic but disastrous. Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Jan 2022 11.50pm) You appear confused. You can stipulate it is a condition of employment to be vaccinated for new starters. Hard to dismiss an existing employee for that once they have served two years though other than in care homes and shortly the NHS. It is the law to be vaccinated when working in a Care Home so any dismissal on those grounds could not be challenged in a Tribunal.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 17 Jan 22 12.19am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
You appear confused. You can stipulate it is a condition of employment to be vaccinated for new starters. Hard to dismiss an existing employee for that once they have served two years though other than in care homes and shortly the NHS. It is the law to be vaccinated when working in a Care Home so any dismissal on those grounds could not be challenged in a Tribunal.
To the point, your mate was talking generally and your initial post to him was quite happy to disingenuously feed his nonsense.....no doubt as it is nonsense you yourself wish for.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
grumpymort US/Thailand/UK 17 Jan 22 2.46am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
My wife is a nurse on a cardiac ward in a large hospital so she isn't on the front line of critical care. Last week they admitted a patient to her ward who hadn't been vaccinated but who had contracted covid on top of the existing heart problems resulting in all of the nurses on that ward catching it and now having to self isolate. Wifey has had all three vaccinations but is still quite badly ill although not ill enough for hospitalisations thank goodness so the unvaccinated are affecting others
Check out the nice study by the danes name is below it shows this but if you do read it dont do like a lot of people here read the conclusion which shows the opposite of what the data does raw data is what is important not words. Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
grumpymort US/Thailand/UK 17 Jan 22 2.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
You appear confused. You can stipulate it is a condition of employment to be vaccinated for new starters. Hard to dismiss an existing employee for that once they have served two years though other than in care homes and shortly the NHS. It is the law to be vaccinated when working in a Care Home so any dismissal on those grounds could not be challenged in a Tribunal. BS you again showing you have no clue what you are talking about The vaccines in the UK are for emergency/temp use only they are not fully licensed you can not force people to take them and with the evidence as well that it does not stop spread in a court case you would rip them apart. The is not ebola or bubonic plague they was a real threat the numbers prove it this is not no increase in death rate has occurred go and look at the raw data of deaths and do the math.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Helmet46 Croydon 17 Jan 22 7.33am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by grumpymort
Check out the nice study by the danes name is below it shows this but if you do read it dont do like a lot of people here read the conclusion which shows the opposite of what the data does raw data is what is important not words. Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron or Delta variants following a two-dose or booster BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccination series
I’ve read and I must confess I’m struggling to see that it shows that the unvaccinated only have cold like symptoms from Omicron and Delta, whilst boosted people get very ill. Genuine question (as I have no medical knowledge and assuming this is the paper you were referring to) what bits in this seemingly short paper articulate the findings you state above? (I appreciate I’ve probably done exactly what you said not to do, but that’s no medical knowledge coming out again). Edited by Helmet46 (17 Jan 2022 7.38am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 17 Jan 22 10.01am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
To the point, your mate was talking generally and your initial post to him was quite happy to disingenuously feed his nonsense.....no doubt as it is nonsense you yourself wish for.
It's a long way from nonsense! Whilst it's true that this appears not to have yet been tested in either a Court or Tribunal, and that legal opinion is not yet settled, the general opinion seems to be that it is reasonable for an employer to include a requirement to be vaccinated in their recruitment policy. You can read some of the reasoning here:-
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.