This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Badger11 Beckenham 04 Jul 21 9.28am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Flooded by Eastern Europeans? I said I agree with sensible border control and would not have allowed this to happen. Not refreshment but something else. However directing your anger at a far smaller population of literate Europeans where most stats suggested they boosted the economy is perverse. Also to sign post the intelligence of that post 'Eastern European"? Poles Czechs Balkans all definitely CENTRAL Europe. I have no doubt that EU citizens have made a contribution to this country however I am not sure about their boost to the economy. I guess it's an unknown or maybe just contentious but if we had controlled the numbers and used our own unemployed would this not have also grown our economy. The problem with importing unskilled labour is that our benefits system subsidises them to a large extent. A married man on minimum wage with 2 kids could claim up to £30,000 in benefits whilst paying only several thousands in tax. And this also doesn't take into account the costs of healthcare education and public transport etc. This is the issue we are finally facing now with the hospitality sector and others demanding we bring in more labour when millions are unemployed. The government needs to stand firm and demand that they look for workers who are already here. At the same time the job centres need to start pushing the unemployed if there is a job there they need to take it. The other day the supermarkets were complaining they don't have enough HGV drivers and we need to import them. I looked it up it takes 2 months elapse time to get a licence whilst its only 5 days training which costs circa £1000. The supermarkets employ tens of thousands they should offer to train some up instead of whining.
Edited by Badger11 (04 Jul 2021 9.29am)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 04 Jul 21 10.42am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I have no doubt that EU citizens have made a contribution to this country however I am not sure about their boost to the economy. I guess it's an unknown or maybe just contentious but if we had controlled the numbers and used our own unemployed would this not have also grown our economy. The problem with importing unskilled labour is that our benefits system subsidises them to a large extent. A married man on minimum wage with 2 kids could claim up to £30,000 in benefits whilst paying only several thousands in tax. And this also doesn't take into account the costs of healthcare education and public transport etc. This is the issue we are finally facing now with the hospitality sector and others demanding we bring in more labour when millions are unemployed. The government needs to stand firm and demand that they look for workers who are already here. At the same time the job centres need to start pushing the unemployed if there is a job there they need to take it. The other day the supermarkets were complaining they don't have enough HGV drivers and we need to import them. I looked it up it takes 2 months elapse time to get a licence whilst its only 5 days training which costs circa £1000. The supermarkets employ tens of thousands they should offer to train some up instead of whining.
Edited by Badger11 (04 Jul 2021 9.29am) It depresses the hell out of me to say this but the imported labour isn't just cheap as the drawbridge up brigade shout (loudly) it is invariably higher quality. Anecdotal evidence supports this including any attempt anyone makes to hire a cleaner. A colleague was very Britain first and went through a string of English cleaners. All useless some fundamentally dishonest. The last straw was when he had to go home and found the cleaner sprawled out on his couch watching his telly and drinking his wine! So he engaged a Pole. Job done. Top notch. Until she relocated to Germany of all places. One push factor was (you may be satisfied to know) Brexit; that and receiving anonymous letters from brave kindly souls urging her to "go home vermin" Makes you proud. Just to be clear Hugenots, Irish, African Asians, HK Chinese, EU nationals and the 50,000 Poles who seamlessly assimilated after the War were largely successes. Mixed views on others and one group has largely been a failure for this country. I mention this as responses to my post suggests I am a door open for all type. Not true. We are weaker and poorer for some post War calamitous errors; but free movement to EU nationals was a complete success in my view as it filled a skill gap created by poor education Like I said all done to death on here but I am just making my view clear as you may have thought I was coming from a different place.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 04 Jul 21 10.57am | |
---|---|
Silvertop is right, it has been done to death and all these points can be pointlessly argued again once the next depressing statistic comes in.....when's that census? This year isn't it.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 04 Jul 21 11.20am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
It depresses the hell out of me to say this but the imported labour isn't just cheap as the drawbridge up brigade shout (loudly) it is invariably higher quality. Anecdotal evidence supports this including any attempt anyone makes to hire a cleaner. A colleague was very Britain first and went through a string of English cleaners. All useless some fundamentally dishonest. The last straw was when he had to go home and found the cleaner sprawled out on his couch watching his telly and drinking his wine! So he engaged a Pole. Job done. Top notch. Until she relocated to Germany of all places. One push factor was (you may be satisfied to know) Brexit; that and receiving anonymous letters from brave kindly souls urging her to "go home vermin" Makes you proud. Just to be clear Hugenots, Irish, African Asians, HK Chinese, EU nationals and the 50,000 Poles who seamlessly assimilated after the War were largely successes. Mixed views on others and one group has largely been a failure for this country. I mention this as responses to my post suggests I am a door open for all type. Not true. We are weaker and poorer for some post War calamitous errors; but free movement to EU nationals was a complete success in my view as it filled a skill gap created by poor education Like I said all done to death on here but I am just making my view clear as you may have thought I was coming from a different place. Exactly why bother training your own population when you can import them. Employers and governments (both parties) need to address this issue. We also need to explain to the unemployed that entry level jobs are not below them. If after all that we still need to import people then fine but not at this moment unless they have skills.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 04 Jul 21 1.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Exactly why bother training your own population when you can import them. Employers and governments (both parties) need to address this issue. We also need to explain to the unemployed that entry level jobs are not below them. If after all that we still need to import people then fine but not at this moment unless they have skills. The theory behind this is unarguable but try selling it to farmers who need their sugar beat pulled now by quality unskilled labour from Romania who arrive on time leave on time and put in a shift in between rather than the local scrotes who might turn up and do all they can to give the appearance of working.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 04 Jul 21 1.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
The theory behind this is unarguable but try selling it to farmers who need their sugar beat pulled now by quality unskilled labour from Romania who arrive on time leave on time and put in a shift in between rather than the local scrotes who might turn up and do all they can to give the appearance of working. There may be an argument for temporary work permits.....which was always possible. I didn't really want to makes these arguments but business needs are one thing....but we first have a duty to the youth and general worker of this nation before anyone else's....and that should be the case in every country. We have had decades of recruitment attitudes that have directly ignored that....and that's been allowed to happen. If English farm pickers are lazy it's because the culture has allowed for that.....if the will is there the culture can be changed. Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Jul 2021 1.47pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 04 Jul 21 2.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
The problem with importing unskilled labour is that our benefits system subsidises them to a large extent. A married man on minimum wage with 2 kids could claim up to £30,000 in benefits whilst paying only several thousands in tax. And this also doesn't take into account the costs of healthcare education and public transport etc. Edited by Badger11 (04 Jul 2021 9.29am) One of the big problems is people use terms like "boost the economy" as a catch all. A lot of the time, we are not importing skilled workers from Eastern Europe to do low skilled work which isn't a benefit to the UK or Eastern European countries. If big business can keep importing overqualified workers on the cheap to do menial work then there is a boost to the economy, but than extra money only lines the pockets of wealthy business owners.... and creates more pressure on housing and services for everyone else. I don't think its a bad thing that big business owners are now having to pay people more. Landlord farmers and supermarkets aren't really short of a few bob no matter how much they protest. I wouldnt vilify the "lazy English workers" (although the champagne socialist seem to love demonising the working class). From 2010 to 2016 we produced more new jobs than the rest of the EU combined. We still had low productivity because of the mass available of cheap labour. There simply aren't the resources available to fill these jobs. Previously recruiters moved people en-mass to parts of the UK that needed labour recruiting directly in Eastern Europe before moving coach loads of seasonal workers to places like Norfolk. Those recruiters have been slow to change their game and now they are paying a premium.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 04 Jul 21 2.50pm | |
---|---|
The other thing to remember is that many jobs will go due to technology. The banks have been trying to close their branch networks for decades but of course every closure is met with local opposition understandably. My bank in Beckenham has hardly been open during the pandemic and when it has it's hours have not been reliable. We are all expecting it to close at some point. It maybe that some temporary permits might be required but in the medium term we need to retrain our workforce and more importantly make it clear to the employers that it is their responsibility. The taxpayer has given companies billions to hep them stay afloat I think we are entitled to get something back.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 04 Jul 21 6.31pm | |
---|---|
Who would have thought that a successful business supplying tennis sportswear for kids would have to relocate to Romania of all places. Free of restrictions they can now deliver next day in the EU, their business has local workers and government backing. It beats coming here picking that's for sure. A typical example of brexit idiocy.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 04 Jul 21 6.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
The theory behind this is unarguable but try selling it to farmers who need their sugar beat pulled now by quality unskilled labour from Romania who arrive on time leave on time and put in a shift in between rather than the local scrotes who might turn up and do all they can to give the appearance of working. As I have said many times on here, the contracts given to EE farm workers are nothing more than slave Labour ( I have seen them). Now if people are happy to support slave Labour so be it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 04 Jul 21 6.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Who would have thought that a successful business supplying tennis sportswear for kids would have to relocate to Romania of all places. Free of restrictions they can now deliver next day in the EU, their business has local workers and government backing. It beats coming here picking that's for sure. A typical example of brexit idiocy.
Nothing to do with very cheap Labour then? I suppose it closer to home than Bangladesh
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
croydon proud Any european country i fancy! 04 Jul 21 7.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Nothing to do with very cheap Labour then? I suppose it closer to home than Bangladesh Surely if a company leaves here to go to Romania or any other european country , to gain access to the e.u market, and as you say pay less for the workforce, then we are in big trouble. Every business wants maximum profit, and if that"s in the e.u, paying less wages for entry in to the biggest trade block, then more will follow. It makes sense to me if you are a business owner-even if it"s getting cheap labour, but in a different country where the cost of living is also a lot cheaper.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.