Court of Appeal is only there to challenge to identify if the process was followed correctly. It's not a re-trial

Gengis Khan would agree with you. He needed men to win all his Wars.

But he saved all the reproduction for himself. The randy fecker.

International Women ? Gengis targetted International women to create others.

Edited by PalazioVecchio (15 Mar 2021 4.23pm)

Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

There will always be men, who for whatever reason, will be violent against women. We all know that they are vulnerable and real men will always look to protect women from harm.

However, opportunists take events like this to push agendas that aren't real reflections of reality.

Three out of four murder victims in the UK are men....not women.

What we are seeing in the news today is much more a reflection of the media and how certain favoured groups are funded and given access than anything like a balanced assessment.

Edited by Stirlingsays (15 Mar 2021 9.26pm)

Attachment: homicides.JPG (86.98Kb)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

i have never seen a gender-based analysis of Hiroshima & Nagasaki.

surely its the first time so many women got killed in War ?

Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Talking to someone yesterday whose Son knew her.
In the background of this mayhem are grieving Family and friends who are probably very angry at the way her (sad and shameful) murder has been hijacked by people who never knew her but who are intent on causing trouble on the back of her death and their loss.
That is shameful when you step back and think about it.
These "protestors" did it again in Parliament Square last night - not sure that I can find that report on the BBC website this morning?
Please correct me if I am wrong

It makes sense that most violence would be between men. If anything these stats make it even more shocking that a decent proportion of those with murderous intent are more than willing to slay a woman unable to defend herself.

That said, I do appreciate that the coverage seeks to paint a fairly hysterical 'rapist around every corner' outlook that targets and tars most men. I can certainly see why women think the law doesn't work well for them in this area, but at the same time it's not sensible to demonise men in such sweeping fashion.

As for the protests, while I certainly tow the covid line in thinking that it shouldn't have taken place to begin with at this moment in time, I can't help but think that it would have been more tactful and less hassle on this occasion to just have a hands off approach for this one vigil. The approach used just seems to make it inevitable that it'd multiply said protests.

It's one of those incidents that I worry about people getting too gungho about police clamp downs, at the same time that civil liberty annihilating bills are on the verge of being passed. It's another example of government playing people off against one another to the detriment of all. I would hope that no sensible person is unworried by the idea of imprisoned for years due to causing "serious annoyance" [Link]

Also under these new rules if you're on your way to a protest you can be deemed to be part of a 'one man protest' with ten months in jail for your troubles. All very V for Vendetta.