You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > Blood on the Carpet at Sky Football studio
November 22 2024 5.37am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Blood on the Carpet at Sky Football studio

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 10 of 16 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >

  

ex hibitionist Flag Hastings 28 Aug 20 8.51pm Send a Private Message to ex hibitionist Add ex hibitionist as a friend

I think it's a good move, it shud all be more like that weekly motd with gaby yorath - watching mixed race yoof cashing in by making vegan pasties on skate boards is def the way forward

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 29 Aug 20 10.36am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by IMpalace

That is obviously not the relevant stat for this conversation. I'd imagine at least 1/3rd, if not more premier league footballers are black.

Whatever the reasoning for getting rid of them, they were all dreadful and in my view unwatchable. Hopefully they get some younger talent on there who have played the game more recently and realise that being a good football pundit doesn't just involve trying to be a lad.

Isn't it? I thought that SSN was for the general public, not current professional footballers.
It might well be true that there are bound to be more TV pundits who are Black in the future but their ability in front of the camera should be the deciding factor on whether they have a new career, not their skin colour.
We live in a world where we are constantly told that skin colour doesn't matter and yet then we are told that we must promote Black interests. Black Lives Matter, Black this Black that. When did you last hear something described relating to people starting with the word 'White' other than a racist insult?

Do you see the problem?

You can't have your cake and eat it. You can't employ this type of doublethink hypocrisy and not expect resistance.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ambrose7 Flag Croydon 29 Aug 20 11.10am Send a Private Message to ambrose7 Add ambrose7 as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Isn't it? I thought that SSN was for the general public, not current professional footballers.
It might well be true that there are bound to be more TV pundits who are Black in the future but their ability in front of the camera should be the deciding factor on whether they have a new career, not their skin colour.
We live in a world where we are constantly told that skin colour doesn't matter and yet then we are told that we must promote Black interests. Black Lives Matter, Black this Black that. When did you last hear something described relating to people starting with the word 'White' other than a racist insult?

Do you see the problem?

You can't have your cake and eat it. You can't employ this type of doublethink hypocrisy and not expect resistance.

If you think that it is their ability that's most important, then surely you need to wait to see who the replacements are and if they're better before you get this upset about it?

Further, if it is the ability that's most important, then people who know what they're talking about are the pool of people able to selected from. That pool is more black than the rest of the population. Therefore, something closer to 35% is the right statistic. There are a lot of Janets who are 70+. living in the UK who have never watched a game of football who are totally irrelevant for the purposes of picking a SSN panel.


Edited by ambrose7 (29 Aug 2020 11.17am)

 


26th January 2010 - Enter Administration
2nd May 2010 - D-Day 1 - Survival at Hillsborough
1st June 2010 - D-Day 2 - Survival at Lloyds
7th June 2010 - CPFC2010 exchange contracts.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 29 Aug 20 11.24am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by ambrose7

If you think that it is their ability that's most important, then surely you need to wait to see who the replacements are and if they're better before you get this upset about it?

Further, if it is the ability that's most important, then people who know what they're talking about are the pool of people able to selected from. That pool is more black than the rest of the population. Therefore, the 35% is the right statistic. There are a lot of Janets who are 70+. living in the UK who have never watched a game of football who are totally irrelevant for the purposes of picking a SSN panel.

Edited by ambrose7 (29 Aug 2020 11.14am)

For tv it’s popularity actually and the people have to reflect the audience to some level. There have been quite a lot of good black pundits but this programme is a bit different in the sense the viewer feels they’re in the room or in the pub with the panel. If the viewer can’t relate to them they’ll switch off. If the panel needed changing they would’ve changed it and if BLM or matt le tissier’s comments didn’t happen they’d still be there. I don’t watch and don’t intend to mainly because I’m not in the demographic that guess what, relates to the panel, plus I’m at football or doing stuff before. Like I said before, it’s a bit odd that young people don’t watch tv, own as many homes or subscribe to sky’s high packages in the same numbers the target audience does. It’s sky operating like a government funded media machine. Viewing figures and advertising will decide. If they have a woman on with no top division football stories or experience to draw from it’s doomed.

Funnily young people watch more sport on illegal streams than through a normal tv subscription.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (29 Aug 2020 11.26am)

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 29 Aug 20 12.13pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

FWIW black culture, faces, interests, whatever should be on tv, but there’s being sensible about it. For example:

BBC spending £100 mil on a diversity agency = bad
BBC having ethnic minorities on the board = good
But that would cost them jobs and salaries. There’s also an argument that black producers don’t get their work aired and only tv creativity that’s ‘urban’ gets on. Well I’m bored of urban tv and it promotes a lot of bad behaviour and morals so I’d see it as a double positive, if they reduced the urban stuff.

Afua Hirsch trying time get statues and history erased = bad
Afua Hirsch presenting a culture series exploring Africa = good

So you see it’s about whether it’s sensible or forced through without any sense of thought, not - you not nice and racist, you nice.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 29 Aug 20 12.19pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

FWIW black culture, faces, interests, whatever should be on tv, but there’s being sensible about it. For example:

BBC spending £100 mil on a diversity agency = bad
BBC having ethnic minorities on the board = good
But that would cost them jobs and salaries. There’s also an argument that black producers don’t get their work aired and only tv creativity that’s ‘urban’ gets on. Well I’m bored of urban tv and it promotes a lot of bad behaviour and morals so I’d see it as a double positive, if they reduced the urban stuff.

Afua Hirsch trying time get statues and history erased = bad
Afua Hirsch presenting a culture series exploring Africa = good

So you see it’s about whether it’s sensible or forced through without any sense of thought, not - you not nice and racist, you nice.

Being politically incorrect I don't think you should get a place on a board because you're a minority and tick a box and I don't want to see Afua Hirsch make a serious exploring Africa.....To be precise I don't want Afua Hirsch at all.

Let those that want to see Hirsch, fund her and she can make whatever it is for them.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Aug 2020 12.20pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 29 Aug 20 12.25pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Being politically incorrect I don't think you should get a place on a board because you're a minority and tick a box and I don't want to see Afua Hirsch make a serious exploring Africa.....To be precise I don't want Afua Hirsch at all.

Let those that want to see Hirsch, fund her and she can make whatever it is for them.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Aug 2020 12.20pm)

She’s on channel 4 or channel 5 I think so it isn’t our say. Advertising again.

Edit: I think it’s on BBC4 so probably the right bbc channel considering it’s culture and history and not drama or current Covid propaganda. It’s away from changing Britain to her vision so I’m not fussed.

I agree that if you’re good enough to be on the board but at the same time I doubt all of those white faces should be on the board either. We know the parameters they have to stay within, and I incidentally forgot to say the bbc board shouldn’t be all left wing, ethnic minorities included, and there non left wing black people around. They’re either getting on with their lives instead of being consumed by this stuff or kept away and only have Twitter to speak, although Twitter is becoming a powerful tool and influence on individuals and changing the media narrative.

Edited by Rudi Hedman (29 Aug 2020 12.30pm)

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 29 Aug 20 12.38pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

FWIW black culture, faces, interests, whatever should be on tv, but there’s being sensible about it. For example:

BBC spending £100 mil on a diversity agency = bad
BBC having ethnic minorities on the board = good
But that would cost them jobs and salaries. There’s also an argument that black producers don’t get their work aired and only tv creativity that’s ‘urban’ gets on. Well I’m bored of urban tv and it promotes a lot of bad behaviour and morals so I’d see it as a double positive, if they reduced the urban stuff.

Afua Hirsch trying time get statues and history erased = bad
Afua Hirsch presenting a culture series exploring Africa = good

So you see it’s about whether it’s sensible or forced through without any sense of thought, not - you not nice and racist, you nice.

I wasn't aware of that and yes it's a complete joke I don't understand why large companies have diversity managers or even departments.

Most organisations have an HR every person in that department should live and breath diversity and equality.

Firstly it's the law, secondly it's good business practice. If you want to attract the top talent do you want to be known as the company that obeys the law or the company that exceeds and excels in promoting diversity.

Diversity in itself is not a bad thing although I prefer the term fairness which is less politically motivated.

How you achieve fairness in your organisation is the real issue. I don't believe that hiring a lot of managers with titles actually works that well its just another layer of bureaucracy and guess what if you pay someone to just look at that issue they will always find a problem otherwise they are out of a job, its a self fulfilling prophesy.

And what exactly are HR doing all day? They no longer do payroll, it should be ingrained into their culture so they don't even think about it they just do it.

Each departmental manager should also feel that way and if they don't well bye bye.

Anyway that's how my company did it as a manager it was down to me I didn't need some third person to tell me.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 29 Aug 20 1.12pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Being politically incorrect I don't think you should get a place on a board because you're a minority and tick a box and I don't want to see Afua Hirsch make a serious exploring Africa.....To be precise I don't want Afua Hirsch at all.

Let those that want to see Hirsch, fund her and she can make whatever it is for them.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Aug 2020 12.20pm)

I'd pay to watch her go on a tour of Eastern Europe and tell the people there that they're all racist. Great viewing. Not a long series though - probably less than one episode is all that they would get.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 29 Aug 20 5.58pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

if the demographic of pundits must match the demographic of players then easy....


fill every panel with feckers who can barely read, write or speak English. regardless of colour.

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 29 Aug 20 6.46pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

I'd pay to watch her go on a tour of Eastern Europe and tell the people there that they're all racist. Great viewing. Not a long series though - probably less than one episode is all that they would get.

Good point.....if Owen Jones can be convinced to go as well I might just tune into that particular episode of passionate 'social justice'.

Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Aug 2020 6.46pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
The Dolphin Flag 30 Aug 20 8.07am Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

Everything has to evolve to keep going and this will be about who they replace these three with.
Le Tiss is good and was also a gifted footballer and will be a huge loss in my opinion.
If he said What he said - who cares- I am heartily sick and tired of people needing to be gagged by the pc/some brigade.
Sky are now in this category.
I turned on SSN in the week to find the Wisconsin story being the main headline - it is a Sports channel for goodness sake.
Sky and the BBC are just promoting Women to men's football, cricket etc regardless of their lack of talent and that is effectively positive discrimination which in turn is just as bad as any other type of discrimination.
For me - if the make up of the panel is pc then they will lose me as a viewer because the banter is a huge part of the show.
Alex Scott and Clinton are simply not up to their jobs but they continue to be promoted by these ridiculous people.
As our mad world gets even madder and as my opinions - along with millions of other hard working average members of the population - become even more marginalised I start to be happy that the end of my life is a lot closer than the beginning of it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 10 of 16 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > Blood on the Carpet at Sky Football studio