This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
ex hibitionist Hastings 28 Aug 20 8.51pm | |
---|---|
I think it's a good move, it shud all be more like that weekly motd with gaby yorath - watching mixed race yoof cashing in by making vegan pasties on skate boards is def the way forward
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 29 Aug 20 10.36am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by IMpalace
That is obviously not the relevant stat for this conversation. I'd imagine at least 1/3rd, if not more premier league footballers are black. Whatever the reasoning for getting rid of them, they were all dreadful and in my view unwatchable. Hopefully they get some younger talent on there who have played the game more recently and realise that being a good football pundit doesn't just involve trying to be a lad. Isn't it? I thought that SSN was for the general public, not current professional footballers. Do you see the problem? You can't have your cake and eat it. You can't employ this type of doublethink hypocrisy and not expect resistance.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ambrose7 Croydon 29 Aug 20 11.10am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Isn't it? I thought that SSN was for the general public, not current professional footballers. Do you see the problem? You can't have your cake and eat it. You can't employ this type of doublethink hypocrisy and not expect resistance. If you think that it is their ability that's most important, then surely you need to wait to see who the replacements are and if they're better before you get this upset about it? Further, if it is the ability that's most important, then people who know what they're talking about are the pool of people able to selected from. That pool is more black than the rest of the population. Therefore, something closer to 35% is the right statistic. There are a lot of Janets who are 70+. living in the UK who have never watched a game of football who are totally irrelevant for the purposes of picking a SSN panel.
26th January 2010 - Enter Administration |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 29 Aug 20 11.24am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ambrose7
If you think that it is their ability that's most important, then surely you need to wait to see who the replacements are and if they're better before you get this upset about it? Further, if it is the ability that's most important, then people who know what they're talking about are the pool of people able to selected from. That pool is more black than the rest of the population. Therefore, the 35% is the right statistic. There are a lot of Janets who are 70+. living in the UK who have never watched a game of football who are totally irrelevant for the purposes of picking a SSN panel. Edited by ambrose7 (29 Aug 2020 11.14am) For tv it’s popularity actually and the people have to reflect the audience to some level. There have been quite a lot of good black pundits but this programme is a bit different in the sense the viewer feels they’re in the room or in the pub with the panel. If the viewer can’t relate to them they’ll switch off. If the panel needed changing they would’ve changed it and if BLM or matt le tissier’s comments didn’t happen they’d still be there. I don’t watch and don’t intend to mainly because I’m not in the demographic that guess what, relates to the panel, plus I’m at football or doing stuff before. Like I said before, it’s a bit odd that young people don’t watch tv, own as many homes or subscribe to sky’s high packages in the same numbers the target audience does. It’s sky operating like a government funded media machine. Viewing figures and advertising will decide. If they have a woman on with no top division football stories or experience to draw from it’s doomed. Funnily young people watch more sport on illegal streams than through a normal tv subscription. Edited by Rudi Hedman (29 Aug 2020 11.26am)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 29 Aug 20 12.13pm | |
---|---|
FWIW black culture, faces, interests, whatever should be on tv, but there’s being sensible about it. For example: BBC spending £100 mil on a diversity agency = bad Afua Hirsch trying time get statues and history erased = bad So you see it’s about whether it’s sensible or forced through without any sense of thought, not - you not nice and racist, you nice.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 29 Aug 20 12.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
FWIW black culture, faces, interests, whatever should be on tv, but there’s being sensible about it. For example: BBC spending £100 mil on a diversity agency = bad Afua Hirsch trying time get statues and history erased = bad So you see it’s about whether it’s sensible or forced through without any sense of thought, not - you not nice and racist, you nice. Being politically incorrect I don't think you should get a place on a board because you're a minority and tick a box and I don't want to see Afua Hirsch make a serious exploring Africa.....To be precise I don't want Afua Hirsch at all. Let those that want to see Hirsch, fund her and she can make whatever it is for them. Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Aug 2020 12.20pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 29 Aug 20 12.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Being politically incorrect I don't think you should get a place on a board because you're a minority and tick a box and I don't want to see Afua Hirsch make a serious exploring Africa.....To be precise I don't want Afua Hirsch at all. Let those that want to see Hirsch, fund her and she can make whatever it is for them. Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Aug 2020 12.20pm) She’s on channel 4 or channel 5 I think so it isn’t our say. Advertising again. Edit: I think it’s on BBC4 so probably the right bbc channel considering it’s culture and history and not drama or current Covid propaganda. It’s away from changing Britain to her vision so I’m not fussed. I agree that if you’re good enough to be on the board but at the same time I doubt all of those white faces should be on the board either. We know the parameters they have to stay within, and I incidentally forgot to say the bbc board shouldn’t be all left wing, ethnic minorities included, and there non left wing black people around. They’re either getting on with their lives instead of being consumed by this stuff or kept away and only have Twitter to speak, although Twitter is becoming a powerful tool and influence on individuals and changing the media narrative. Edited by Rudi Hedman (29 Aug 2020 12.30pm)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 29 Aug 20 12.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
FWIW black culture, faces, interests, whatever should be on tv, but there’s being sensible about it. For example: BBC spending £100 mil on a diversity agency = bad Afua Hirsch trying time get statues and history erased = bad So you see it’s about whether it’s sensible or forced through without any sense of thought, not - you not nice and racist, you nice. I wasn't aware of that and yes it's a complete joke I don't understand why large companies have diversity managers or even departments. Most organisations have an HR every person in that department should live and breath diversity and equality. Firstly it's the law, secondly it's good business practice. If you want to attract the top talent do you want to be known as the company that obeys the law or the company that exceeds and excels in promoting diversity. Diversity in itself is not a bad thing although I prefer the term fairness which is less politically motivated. How you achieve fairness in your organisation is the real issue. I don't believe that hiring a lot of managers with titles actually works that well its just another layer of bureaucracy and guess what if you pay someone to just look at that issue they will always find a problem otherwise they are out of a job, its a self fulfilling prophesy. And what exactly are HR doing all day? They no longer do payroll, it should be ingrained into their culture so they don't even think about it they just do it. Each departmental manager should also feel that way and if they don't well bye bye. Anyway that's how my company did it as a manager it was down to me I didn't need some third person to tell me.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 29 Aug 20 1.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Being politically incorrect I don't think you should get a place on a board because you're a minority and tick a box and I don't want to see Afua Hirsch make a serious exploring Africa.....To be precise I don't want Afua Hirsch at all. Let those that want to see Hirsch, fund her and she can make whatever it is for them. Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Aug 2020 12.20pm) I'd pay to watch her go on a tour of Eastern Europe and tell the people there that they're all racist. Great viewing. Not a long series though - probably less than one episode is all that they would get.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 29 Aug 20 5.58pm | |
---|---|
if the demographic of pundits must match the demographic of players then easy....
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 29 Aug 20 6.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I'd pay to watch her go on a tour of Eastern Europe and tell the people there that they're all racist. Great viewing. Not a long series though - probably less than one episode is all that they would get. Good point.....if Owen Jones can be convinced to go as well I might just tune into that particular episode of passionate 'social justice'. Edited by Stirlingsays (29 Aug 2020 6.46pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 30 Aug 20 8.07am | |
---|---|
Everything has to evolve to keep going and this will be about who they replace these three with.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.