You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > VAR at its worst
November 21 2024 5.32pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

VAR at its worst

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 10 of 12 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

  

Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 26 Apr 21 12.12pm Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

You are right, I totally disagree with you! Played the ball fairly, then made contact, which could not be avoided

If that was a Craig Dawson v Wilfried Zaha, I suspect many of our supporters would have deemed a "Red" appropriate !!!!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Phil’s Barber Flag Crowborough 26 Apr 21 2.37pm Send a Private Message to Phil’s Barber Add Phil’s Barber as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

Red card for me also.

The ref perfectly positioned to see that this was not just a follow through but a deliberate deviation.

Full marks to the ref.


I haven’t yet seen one pundit, reporter, commentator or ex pro share your view. In fact I have to agree with David Moyes and others who have stated that the decision could only have been made by someone who has never played the game.

Btw, the (perfectly positioned) ref didn’t give it. He was told by the VAR to subsequently go and look at the monitor.

There was no deviation. The follow through made by Balbuena was a perfectly natural one and anyone who has played the game would say the same.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Phil’s Barber Flag Crowborough 26 Apr 21 2.39pm Send a Private Message to Phil’s Barber Add Phil’s Barber as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

If that was a Craig Dawson v Wilfried Zaha, I suspect many of our supporters would have deemed a "Red" appropriate !!!!

Replacing Chilwell for Zaha (or any other of our players for that matter) wouldn’t change the fact that it wasn’t even a foul, never mind a red card.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 26 Apr 21 3.13pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by Phil’s Barber

I haven’t yet seen one pundit, reporter, commentator or ex pro share your view. In fact I have to agree with David Moyes and others who have stated that the decision could only have been made by someone who has never played the game.

Btw, the (perfectly positioned) ref didn’t give it. He was told by the VAR to subsequently go and look at the monitor.

There was no deviation. The follow through made by Balbuena was a perfectly natural one and anyone who has played the game would say the same.

They would be wrong.

Backward pressure rubbing on the calf, that is not a natural follow through.

Deliberate, cynical, clever, but got caught out.

Pundits, especially Lineker, should go to spec-savers.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Spiderman Flag Horsham 26 Apr 21 3.38pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

They would be wrong.

Backward pressure rubbing on the calf, that is not a natural follow through.

Deliberate, cynical, clever, but got caught out.

Pundits, especially Lineker, should go to spec-savers.


Sorry it was a natural follow through. Not sure where you get the backward pressure rubbing down the calf. He had got the ball cleanly with a perfectly timed tackle. Players are always going to get caught during tackling. This is the sort of decision that will eradicate tackling. Wouldn’t be surprised if red overturned imo

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 26 Apr 21 4.01pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Well let's see if there is an appeal and what it brings.

I have just reviewed it again and to me B does more than follow though and forces into the back of the leg, but it is not an easy spot.

The other incident I felt was a natural follow through.

Sakho last year, for example, a natural follow through.

The ref, after consulting the monitor, looks very clear in his mind.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Eaglecoops Flag CR3 26 Apr 21 4.20pm Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

All tackles look bad in slow motion. It was a very harsh sending off. Having won the ball comfortably before the other player got even close he was doing nothing other than following through on a natural path. I agree with those who say it wasn't even a foul.

There appears to be lots of decisions these days which are contrary to what everyone knows is correct who has played the game. Another classic was a players foot being taken out and jammed against the ball which is a foul but is not given because it looks like the ball has travelled on the path it would take if it was a clean tackle.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
deleted 25 Flag 26 Apr 21 7.27pm

Luke Shaw handballed in the area and adverted the ball reaching a Leeds player in a clear scoring position

Made no effort to get out of the way and the ball was not diverted into him.

Was a definite penalty and potential red card. VAR was supposed to root out bias but MU still getting the decisions

Edited by Vincehair (26 Apr 2021 7.28pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Spiderman Flag Horsham 27 Apr 21 8.17am Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Eaglecoops

All tackles look bad in slow motion. It was a very harsh sending off. Having won the ball comfortably before the other player got even close he was doing nothing other than following through on a natural path. I agree with those who say it wasn't even a foul.

There appears to be lots of decisions these days which are contrary to what everyone knows is correct who has played the game. Another classic was a players foot being taken out and jammed against the ball which is a foul but is not given because it looks like the ball has travelled on the path it would take if it was a clean tackle.

This

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 27 Apr 21 1.41pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

The pundits said Leicester goal was a hand ball last night. I didn't see the replay - what did everyone else think?

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Eaglecoops Flag CR3 27 Apr 21 1.49pm Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

The pundits said Leicester goal was a hand ball last night. I didn't see the replay - what did everyone else think?

Hand ball, hand ball, hand ball, HAND BALL...... Sorry, we are the wrong team to get that decision. VAR is licensed cheating.

Actually I have no idea as I didn't see the incident, but you get my drift.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Phil’s Barber Flag Crowborough 27 Apr 21 1.55pm Send a Private Message to Phil’s Barber Add Phil’s Barber as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

The pundits said Leicester goal was a hand ball last night. I didn't see the replay - what did everyone else think?

From what I saw it looked from one angle that it had hit his hand but then when viewed from another (behind the player) it clearly hit the inside of his thigh and was a good 12 inches away from his hand.

It was just one misleading camera angle that looked like a handball but it was quickly ruled out when viewed from other angles.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 10 of 12 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > VAR at its worst