Did you not say ‘here is one of those islamaphobes’? Your language - not mine.

That was Sarcasm.

How you didn't understand that quite obvious bit of sarcasm sums you up.

Quite obvious to who? You obviously, but you clearly don't understand how to communicate clearly in the written form within an online forum where linguistic nuance is absent. Oh and it's rich you criticising me on the basis of using sarcasm when you are using the exact same linguistic ploy yourself.

You made stupid claims about Jews in our debate. Again, I urge people to read your amusing claims about IQ tests being unintentionally slanted towards Jews by Jews....it's a bit of a humdinger.

The debate starts on page 2 for anyone interested in reading it....quite amusing when read within the current context over Corbyn, who this guy obviously supports. I'll add again, I don't know that you are anti semitic and I didn't say you were. People can read your comments and come to their own conclusions....but I'll say it again, I don't know you to say and so I'm not calling you anti semitic. You made dim remarks and people make dim remarks all the time...I'm not inside your head to know their motivation. If you are going to say I called you anti semitic you are lying. If I believed that I would have said it.

I've also noticed that you like to pathway into victimhood from your debates with others. You did it with me and I offered you the option of not communicating if you preferred.....obviously you have ignored that.

Your comments, 'I don't know how you get away with it' suggest to me that you like to complain...which would fit with your victimhood tendency. I suggest to you again...If you are going to play victim not communicating is an option for you.

Turning to the Nazis and healthcare. I would be interested in knowing where this cut and paste has come from. It doesn't really say much of any detail nor contradict anything I said.

You think your family's history in WW2 is relevant to a discussion about historical accuracy? I could relate my own family's history but it's an appeal to emotion.

Not liking the Nazis is fine and far better than the opposite. I find it irritating that you label me as having given them a 'positive review' and 'lauding them'. I'd already included intense criticism of the Nazis along with my other comments...over your head obviously.

Just for those who have only read your disingenuous post here I'll again state that they were a terrible regime who are responsible for large unspeakable crimes against humanity unrelated to the base conflict.....up to six million Jews and at least double that plus civilian Russians.

However this is no excuse for a disregard of history and a desire to paint it with little objectivity. When you read up on these things I find the emotionalism annoying. Nothing I stated was inaccurate. You inserted yourself and claimed otherwise and made a fool of yourself....more so with the Jewish comments later on.

The Nazis were national socialists.....a mixture of extreme authoritarianism with socialist policies....not international socialism but national socialism as I said.

Knowledge is better than ignorance and attempted objectivity is better than emotionalism.

Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Mar 2018 6.52am)

I note your personal attack on me again, this time you accuse me of victimhood.

At all is where the sentence should've ended
Talk about walking into things.

You really are quite witty.

Edited by Park Road (27 Mar 2018 2.18pm)