This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 24 Apr 17 3.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
If you cared about society you wouldn't be stirring up hatred with your obvious hatred of difference. Mmmm...But you are fine with 'hatred of difference' if a 'repressed minority' display it. Rarely hear of complaints from the left on that score. I know some of them think it but they are too scared of their own tribe's stupid name calling. It's the grassroot right and a few brave liberals who push back on this....If it wasn't for us god knows what you lot would let society turn into. You'd end up like the secularists in Turkey....fiddling while Constantinople burned. Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Apr 2017 3.32pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Far away fan On the border of jungle 24 Apr 17 3.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pussay Patrol 24 Apr 17 3.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
If you weren't so dim you would recognise that this subject goes beyond politics. As someone who spends most of their time campaigning and spinning for Labour, you know that every party has an agenda to appeal to it's target voters. UKIP is no different. actually I was hoping the debate would be just about the politics, I think such a policy puts them further to the right and with them at the height of their appeal to the electorate and post brexit I find it a bold step. I think it's a mistake, dangerous and will turn off the disenfranchised Labour voters in the north who may have switched to UKIP. I doubt whether Farage would have done it
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 24 Apr 17 4.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
EFA Satanists, not illegal and recognised by the UK and US military for military services. The Church of Satan and Lucifarianism are genuine accepted religions. Paedophiles - Consensus is that they damage and exploit children, sexually, and in a manner that is harmful. Whilst there is debate to be had on the age of consent maybe, and how its established. Cannibals - Almost unheard of and typically identified as a fetish in serial killers. Tolerance should be up to the point at which people are being harmed, killed or otherwise abused in the name of religion. Rather than focus on the innocent muslims, maybe we should do something about the countries that we support that fund Sunni sulfist Jyhadists? Muslim women are definitely victims of extreme forms of Islam, but do you think their lives will improve if you ban the burka, or do you think they'll just end up spending more time indoors. Can't say for sure but you could have argued that for any number of steps in the emancipation of women. I don't see how anyone can argue that feeling obliged to cover from head to foot is not harmful. It is just another example of how those on the left compromise their position in a cognitive dissonance crisis.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tom-the-eagle Croydon 24 Apr 17 4.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
actually I was hoping the debate would be just about the politics, I think such a policy puts them further to the right and with them at the height of their appeal to the electorate and post brexit I find it a bold step. I think it's a mistake, dangerous and will turn off the disenfranchised Labour voters in the north who may have switched to UKIP. I doubt whether Farage would have done it
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Far away fan On the border of jungle 24 Apr 17 4.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Can't say for sure but you could have argued that for any number of steps in the emancipation of women. I don't see how anyone can argue that feeling obliged to cover from head to foot is not harmful. It is just another example of how those on the left compromise their position in a cognitive dissonance crisis. Hrolf these people of appeasement will bring their own demise in the end as history has always shown.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Brentmiester_General Front line in the battle against t... 24 Apr 17 4.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Far away fan
Someone wearing a Burka i find it uncomfortable and muslim women should put a stop to it how about that. What you feel about them is up to you. Doesn't mean that you have any power to do a anything about it. I'm also doubting very much that you see it as woman's rights issue, considering where you are living has one of the worst female explotation issues the whole world over. Edited by Brentmiester_General (24 Apr 2017 4.24pm)
"We love you Palace, we f@cking hate Man U, We love you Palace, we hate the brighton too, We love you Palace we play in red 'n' blue, so f@ck you, and you ... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Far away fan On the border of jungle 24 Apr 17 4.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Brentmiester_General
What you feal about them is up to you. Doesn't mean that you have any power to do a anything about it. I'm also doubting very much that you see it as woman's rights issue, considering where you are living has one of the worst female exploration issues the whole world over.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
bubble wrap Carparks in South East London 24 Apr 17 4.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Part Time James
Personally I am hoping a burka ban is just a stepping stone to a polo shirt ban. Also crocs, turned up skinny jeans, suit jackets with jeans and harem pants. Crocs have to go. Have seen whole famlies with these on, Dad with his socks on too.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 24 Apr 17 5.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Can't say for sure but you could have argued that for any number of steps in the emancipation of women. I don't see how anyone can argue that feeling obliged to cover from head to foot is not harmful. It is just another example of how those on the left compromise their position in a cognitive dissonance crisis. Yeah but they were largely earned by women supported by men such as the Womens Sufferage movement etc, and typically they obtained those rights and steps against firm resistance by a patriarchal society that opposed not only those women, but those men that supported them. It is a big issue among the Islamic and Muslim feminist movements the whole notion of men determining rules for women. Muslim feminists generally want to remove the obligation and the idea of a dress code determined by men, for one determined by the woman herself. This I agree with.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 24 Apr 17 5.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by bubble wrap
Crocs have to go. Have seen whole families with these on, Dad with his socks on too. A final solution would be perfectly acceptable for this crime.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 24 Apr 17 5.27pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Far away fan
Hrolf these people of appeasement will bring their own demise in the end as history has always shown. Such as when?
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.