This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stuk Top half 30 Mar 16 1.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I don't think it's important that women's football is as popular as men's. I think women's football has a right to promote itself and that the public has a right to respond to the promotion. The balance of pay should reflect the interest gathered. It shouldn't be about the gender or changing social attitudes within society. The highest paid fighters in MMA (mixed martial arts) are women and that's fine and dandy. What they sell attracts the punters and the pay reflects that. I don't see male MMA stars moaning about it and nor should they. The pay you earn should reflect the value you give to the person or organization paying you. Your gender is a sub note. If it helps you, great, if it doesn't tough cheese...chose another profession if you don't like it. They aren't. What you mean is Ronda Rousey for a very short period (a fight or two) got the most contracted pay, which makes up the smallest part of the overall pay. She is not even in the top 50 for highest earners from UFC.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
coulsdoneagle London 30 Mar 16 1.51pm | |
---|---|
I realise I'm a couple of pages late to the party, was reading a discussion about teaching kids in school between Jamie and Stuk I don't get why anyone would delay teaching kids about things like gender and sexuality. If they are learning that people have mummys and daddys they should be learning that some people have two mums or two dads etc. By waiting till secondary school or till they have learnt what they perceive as 'normal' you are then abnormalising something completely normal. They are learning that these things directly counter what they understand and have done from such a young age. Do I think kids should be forced to be educated in things like these to keep them as open minded as possible? Absolutely, I also think they should be forced to learn maths and English, am I forcing too much on kids stuk? By the way I'm not talking about having classes on what a Trans person is, I'm just talking about not making it anything but normal. If your headmaster is Gay then he should be free when telling kids anecdotes as teachers do, to mention his husband or whatever. If they have questions, then they should be answered.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 30 Mar 16 2.03pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
I agree, to an extent, equality is something that must be earned, rather than just given. I don't think you can simply state that x is equal to y. X must demonstrate its right to be regarded as equal, otherwise you end up in a nightmare of trying to catagorise and legislate unnecessarily. The law should reflect these rights and social justices only as they apply to the law. The equal pay act for example, makes sense, because it addresses a fundermental unfairness in society based on gender of all people. Situations where 'mens tennis pays more' is driven by wider social dynamics, and its down to those involved in the sport to push the envelope and sporting body towards that ideal - not for the stage to step in and demand it. Here in the situation applies only to a small subset of gender, and factors such as commercial demand, popularity, sponsorship etc factor into the equation - Notably as well some women tennis players earn more than some men and the job they do is different. I know that sounds a bit 'washy' but I think there is difference between the Equal Pay act and payments in sporting competitions. I'd like to see a situation where women's football is as popular as men's football. Heaven f*cking forbid.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 30 Mar 16 2.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by coulsdoneagle
I realise I'm a couple of pages late to the party, was reading a discussion about teaching kids in school between Jamie and Stuk I don't get why anyone would delay teaching kids about things like gender and sexuality. If they are learning that people have mummys and daddys they should be learning that some people have two mums or two dads etc. By waiting till secondary school or till they have learnt what they perceive as 'normal' you are then abnormalising something completely normal. They are learning that these things directly counter what they understand and have done from such a young age. Do I think kids should be forced to be educated in things like these to keep them as open minded as possible? Absolutely, I also think they should be forced to learn maths and English, am I forcing too much on kids stuk? By the way I'm not talking about having classes on what a Trans person is, I'm just talking about not making it anything but normal. If your headmaster is Gay then he should be free when telling kids anecdotes as teachers do, to mention his husband or whatever. If they have questions, then they should be answered. But that's what Jamie and I were talking about and what the whole topic started with. Nowadays primary school kids, for the most, are well aware there are gay couples. Maths and English will still be more important at that age though, as we all need them at that age. And the parents should still have the choice of what additional things they're told/taught until secondary school IMO. This is the case when it comes to being taught/told about religion so to say that parents don't, or shouldn't, have any say over their kid's education is false.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 30 Mar 16 4.17pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stuk
But that's what Jamie and I were talking about and what the whole topic started with. Nowadays primary school kids, for the most, are well aware there are gay couples. Maths and English will still be more important at that age though, as we all need them at that age. And the parents should still have the choice of what additional things they're told/taught until secondary school IMO. This is the case when it comes to being taught/told about religion so to say that parents don't, or shouldn't, have any say over their kid's education is false. With greater reflection and thought, I also ended up agreeing with stuk. I do find it odd that people wouldn't teach their children about more than just men and women, husbands and wives, but would teach them about a virgin birth the necessity of slowly torturing animals to death or slicing off foreskins for god. But c'est la vie, We all have to get along.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stuk Top half 30 Mar 16 4.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
With greater reflection and thought, I also ended up agreeing with stuk. I belatedly saw that when this brought it back to the top.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EaglesEaglesEagles 30 Mar 16 6.39pm | |
---|---|
I'm not a fan of the word 'normal' in the context of educating children about diversity. I haven't met a transgender person in my life. To say that experiencing feelings of being 'trapped' in a body of the wrong sex is not in my opinion 'normal'. I would say that it is a sign of being mentally dysfunctional. Being gay is different. It is fundamentally about sexual attraction, a primal instinct that is shared by animals. Nor, according to studies is same-sex attraction confined to humans. Transgenderism isn't in my view normal. As we are told every day by the experts and liberal proselytes, gender is a human construct. Certain, behavioural characteristics are associated with it. Therefore, I think that teaching children about transgenderism specifically at any stage of their schooling isn't necessary. With the internet they'll find out about it anyway. What must be taught is a fundamental respect for the diversity in experiences and feelings that others have and that others must be treated with dignity and respect. I personally think trans people need love and compassion. That can take many, many forms I'm not suggesting a particular one. But honestly, if you found out a girl/guy you thought looked alright was in fact trans would you still be interested. I think from about 95% of straight people, the honest answer/thought would be 'no'. This last point is perhaps redundant, but would those people be transphobic because of their feeling? Surely not, because a person's biological sex has nothing to do with 'gender' (so we're told) so for example a transgender woman who is attracted to men is still technically homosexual. Sorry for all my nonsense, it's probably pointless and boring.
I ain't got nuthin' funny to say. Sorry. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 30 Mar 16 7.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EaglesEaglesEagles
I'm not a fan of the word 'normal' in the context of educating children about diversity. I haven't met a transgender person in my life. To say that experiencing feelings of being 'trapped' in a body of the wrong sex is not in my opinion 'normal'. I would say that it is a sign of being mentally dysfunctional. Being gay is different. It is fundamentally about sexual attraction, a primal instinct that is shared by animals. Nor, according to studies is same-sex attraction confined to humans. Transgenderism isn't in my view normal. As we are told every day by the experts and liberal proselytes, gender is a human construct. Certain, behavioural characteristics are associated with it. Therefore, I think that teaching children about transgenderism specifically at any stage of their schooling isn't necessary. With the internet they'll find out about it anyway. What must be taught is a fundamental respect for the diversity in experiences and feelings that others have and that others must be treated with dignity and respect. I personally think trans people need love and compassion. That can take many, many forms I'm not suggesting a particular one. But honestly, if you found out a girl/guy you thought looked alright was in fact trans would you still be interested. I think from about 95% of straight people, the honest answer/thought would be 'no'. This last point is perhaps redundant, but would those people be transphobic because of their feeling? Surely not, because a person's biological sex has nothing to do with 'gender' (so we're told) so for example a transgender woman who is attracted to men is still technically homosexual. Sorry for all my nonsense, it's probably pointless and boring. Ignorance on a scale. Kids who are born with too many 'bits' have to be assigned a gender before their 20th month or summat. The peeps involved do what they can to get it right and place the child under a 'male' or 'female' heading but they aren't infallible. They get it wrong sometimes.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
coulsdoneagle London 30 Mar 16 8.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stuk
But that's what Jamie and I were talking about and what the whole topic started with. Nowadays primary school kids, for the most, are well aware there are gay couples. Maths and English will still be more important at that age though, as we all need them at that age. And the parents should still have the choice of what additional things they're told/taught until secondary school IMO. This is the case when it comes to being taught/told about religion so to say that parents don't, or shouldn't, have any say over their kid's education is false. Have to say I disagree with you about the role of parents as sole decision makers in educating kids on things like religion and sexuality. Bigot parents tend to breed bigot kids. I think that no matter what the age, if parents are saying gays are wrong and Muslims are bad there should be education in school that can counter that and inform people about religions and sexuality so the kids have more of a chance to grow with different opinions rather than having their views shaped by wrong views. I speak from experience having worked in schools about the fact that you can make a pretty good judgement about a kids parents just by how the kid talks about certain things. I have heard 6 year olds repeat casually racist and homophobic statements because of things heard at home. Sometimes it's as seemingly innocuous as calling a kid gay, other time it's worse referring to brown kids as bloody pa*is. I think there needs to be a way to mediate what they take in at that age.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EaglesEaglesEagles 30 Mar 16 9.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Ignorance on a scale. Kids who are born with too many 'bits' have to be assigned a gender before their 20th month or summat. The peeps involved do what they can to get it right and place the child under a 'male' or 'female' heading but they aren't infallible. They get it wrong sometimes. I am ignorant I think only as to what ignorant on a scale means. You Sir are either ignorant of what I was describing, or attempting humour on a level I am ignorant (gettit!?) of. You seem to be referring in your reply to my ignorance of the lives and rights of intersex people (formally known as hermaphrodites). This is not the case. Do please refer to our wonderful nhs lovely explanation page about gender dysphoria:
I ain't got nuthin' funny to say. Sorry. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 30 Mar 16 9.41pm | |
---|---|
. Edited by matt_himself (31 Mar 2016 3.24am)
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
johnfirewall 30 Mar 16 11.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by matt_himself
Why do you get a w*** on trying to be 'right on'? The fact is that you probably met a very limited amount of trannies in your life. I speak from my experience, I think I can count the number of trannies I have met on one hand. There was one at my Mum's church on Sunday. Six foot four and looked like a bloke in a dress. The fact is that it isn't that common, however you dress it up. There should be no competition on how many trannies you know. I probably know the same amount as you. Why keep trying to educate the masses on your 'experiences'? No one really cares or thinks it's exceptional. Shame the liberals aren't really in to western religion otherwise they'd be queueing up to hang out with a trans person. Really though there are likely to be a number of people who can't be themselves because it's not perceived as normal. Not that I can get my head round a massive geezer in a dress and whether he actually thinks he's in the wrong body. There's a transvestite (I think that's still the term for someone who dresses as the opposite sex) who goes round the Glades telling everyone about his paralysed hand, a strange fib which the shopkeepers have cottoned on to. I'm not saying everyone who disputes their birth gender has a personality disorder but what better way to assume another identity than to adopt one of the opposite sex.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.