You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Who has the numbers needed to govern?
November 24 2024 3.24am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Who has the numbers needed to govern?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 10 of 18 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >

  

The Sash Flag Now residing in Epsom - How Posh 31 Mar 15 9.02am Send a Private Message to The Sash Add The Sash as a friend

Quote susmik at 30 Mar 2015 8.11pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Mar 2015 2.45pm

Quote Willo at 30 Mar 2015 1.58pm

Quote EricYoung'sSweatBand at 30 Mar 2015 12.13pm

Cutting taxes for the richest

This is a cynical class war sound-bite trotted out incessantly by Labour since the top rate of tax was cut from 50p to 45p. In reality the share of tax paid by the top 1% of tax payers is projected to rise from 25% in 2010 to 27% this year, higher than in any one of Labour's 13 years in power.

Furthermore the lower paid 50% of tax payers now pay a smaller portion of income tax than at any time under the previous government.


But more VAT. Swings and roundabouts, give with one hand take with the other. and besides, what a nation need isn't 'money in the pocket', its the functional aparatus of state.

Is it any wonder people talk of failing Britain, when successive governments have continued to reduce public services (admittedly slower under labour than the conservatives) in order to cut taxation.

Public services are what binds a nation together, they are the fabric of interconnectivity that bring us togeather as a people and feed throughout our culture and identity.

I don't blame the conservatives alone, labour are just as bad, they talk up the idea of nationhood, citizenship, duty and belonging to a great nation, but have essentially spent the last 25 years tearing that fabric apart in order to win elections.

I wouldn't vote conservative, but I absolutely would never vote labour either. Democracy in the UK is a dead horse, and has been since Blair effectively finished turning the Labour party into a Conservative lite party. Ted Heath was more left wing than New Labour.

A signficant part of the electorate aren't even represented due the the abuse of constitutional democracy creating a two horse race for almost every seat.


Its not the fact its a two horse race but because many people just do not want to get off their big fat butts and go along and vote....AND you also find that the ones who shout out loudest about the government of the day being cr@p and useless are the ones who have not voted anyway......this time round you really do have only two choices and that is to vote Labour or conservatives as to let the SNP get in on a coalition is suicide, and again IF Labour do happen to get in its DOOM AND BUST all over again I am afraid so take your pick.....the choice is yours...

I shout quite loud and I don't vote and its not because I don't want to get off my 'big fat butt' but the choices, I and everyone else are given are simply an illusion, an illusion that you actually have choice and a difference between what you are voting for.

Two right of centre parties of very little difference or substance who are there purely to keep the status quo and maintain a political cycle and system, supported by partisans who have no balance to their politics.

The biggest difference between Labour and Tory in modern Britain is the colour of tie they wear.

Give me an option on a ballot paper that says 'none of the above' and Ill be there.

 


As far as the rules go, it's a website not a democracy - Hambo 3/6/2014

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 31 Mar 15 9.17am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Quote The Sash at 31 Mar 2015 9.02am


an illusion that you actually have choice and a difference between what you are voting for.

You DO have a choice and Britain faces a stark choice.

You can choose an economy that grows, that creates jobs, that generates the money to ensure a properly funded and improving NHS - as well as a Government that will cut taxes for 30 million hardworking people.

Or you can choose the economic chaos of Ed Miliband's Britain - over £3000 in higher taxes for every working family to pay for more welfare and out-of-control spending. Debt will rise and jobs will be lost as a result.

Ed Miliband pays "lip service" to working people while planning to increase taxes and increase debt.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 31 Mar 15 9.18am

Quote Willo at 31 Mar 2015 9.17am

Quote The Sash at 31 Mar 2015 9.02am


an illusion that you actually have choice and a difference between what you are voting for.

You DO have a choice and Britain faces a stark choice.

You can choose an economy that grows, that creates jobs, that generates the money to ensure a properly funded and improving NHS - as well as a Government that will cut taxes for 30 million hardworking people.

Or you can choose the economic chaos of Ed Miliband's Britain - over £3000 in higher taxes for every working family to pay for more welfare and out-of-control spending. Debt will rise and jobs will be lost as a result.

Ed Miliband pays "lip service" to working people while planning to increase taxes and increase debt.

Sorry, but Cameron was castigated for his 3k higher taxes comments. Check out the fallout from what your dear leader days before parroting.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 31 Mar 15 9.23am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 31 Mar 2015 9.18am

Sorry, but Cameron was castigated for his 3k higher taxes comments. Check out the fallout from what your dear leader days before parroting.

NOT castigated by me ! Others are free to say what they wish, we live in a 'Free' country.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 31 Mar 15 9.30am

Quote Willo at 31 Mar 2015 9.23am

Quote nickgusset at 31 Mar 2015 9.18am

Sorry, but Cameron was castigated for his 3k higher taxes comments. Check out the fallout from what your dear leader days before parroting.

NOT castigated by me ! Others are free to say what they wish, we live in a 'Free' country.



But the comments are without foundation.. .

[Link]

Are you just blindly ignoring this?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
EricYoung'sSweatBand Flag 31 Mar 15 9.33am

Quote Willo at 31 Mar 2015 9.17am

Quote The Sash at 31 Mar 2015 9.02am


an illusion that you actually have choice and a difference between what you are voting for.

You DO have a choice and Britain faces a stark choice.

You can choose an economy that grows, that creates jobs, that generates the money to ensure a properly funded and improving NHS - as well as a Government that will cut taxes for 30 million hardworking people.

Or you can choose the economic chaos of Ed Miliband's Britain - over £3000 in higher taxes for every working family to pay for more welfare and out-of-control spending. Debt will rise and jobs will be lost as a result.

Ed Miliband pays "lip service" to working people while planning to increase taxes and increase debt.

Literally unfounded accusations.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 31 Mar 15 9.35am

To be fair, if I had to pay a bit more tax to keep public services going, that wouldn't bother me.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 31 Mar 15 9.39am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 31 Mar 2015 9.30am

Quote Willo at 31 Mar 2015 9.23am

Quote nickgusset at 31 Mar 2015 9.18am

Sorry, but Cameron was castigated for his 3k higher taxes comments. Check out the fallout from what your dear leader days before parroting.

NOT castigated by me ! Others are free to say what they wish, we live in a 'Free' country.



But the comments are without foundation.. .

[Link]

Are you just blindly ignoring this?

I don't read the 'Guardian', I am a 'Mail' and 'Telegraph' reader but I have read the link.

Ed Miliband categorically said that £15 billion of savings will come from taxation. When you consider the working families of this country this equates to £3K for the following parliament.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
EricYoung'sSweatBand Flag 31 Mar 15 9.42am

Quote The Sash at 31 Mar 2015 9.02am

Quote susmik at 30 Mar 2015 8.11pm

Quote jamiemartin721 at 30 Mar 2015 2.45pm

Quote Willo at 30 Mar 2015 1.58pm

Quote EricYoung'sSweatBand at 30 Mar 2015 12.13pm

Cutting taxes for the richest

This is a cynical class war sound-bite trotted out incessantly by Labour since the top rate of tax was cut from 50p to 45p. In reality the share of tax paid by the top 1% of tax payers is projected to rise from 25% in 2010 to 27% this year, higher than in any one of Labour's 13 years in power.

Furthermore the lower paid 50% of tax payers now pay a smaller portion of income tax than at any time under the previous government.


But more VAT. Swings and roundabouts, give with one hand take with the other. and besides, what a nation need isn't 'money in the pocket', its the functional aparatus of state.

Is it any wonder people talk of failing Britain, when successive governments have continued to reduce public services (admittedly slower under labour than the conservatives) in order to cut taxation.

Public services are what binds a nation together, they are the fabric of interconnectivity that bring us togeather as a people and feed throughout our culture and identity.

I don't blame the conservatives alone, labour are just as bad, they talk up the idea of nationhood, citizenship, duty and belonging to a great nation, but have essentially spent the last 25 years tearing that fabric apart in order to win elections.

I wouldn't vote conservative, but I absolutely would never vote labour either. Democracy in the UK is a dead horse, and has been since Blair effectively finished turning the Labour party into a Conservative lite party. Ted Heath was more left wing than New Labour.

A signficant part of the electorate aren't even represented due the the abuse of constitutional democracy creating a two horse race for almost every seat.


Its not the fact its a two horse race but because many people just do not want to get off their big fat butts and go along and vote....AND you also find that the ones who shout out loudest about the government of the day being cr@p and useless are the ones who have not voted anyway......this time round you really do have only two choices and that is to vote Labour or conservatives as to let the SNP get in on a coalition is suicide, and again IF Labour do happen to get in its DOOM AND BUST all over again I am afraid so take your pick.....the choice is yours...

I shout quite loud and I don't vote and its not because I don't want to get off my 'big fat butt' but the choices, I and everyone else are given are simply an illusion, an illusion that you actually have choice and a difference between what you are voting for.

Two right of centre parties of very little difference or substance who are there purely to keep the status quo and maintain a political cycle and system, supported by partisans who have no balance to their politics.

The biggest difference between Labour and Tory in modern Britain is the colour of tie they wear.

Give me an option on a ballot paper that says 'none of the above' and Ill be there.


And do you think that no voting will change anything? Beating yourself with a stick and then complaining that it hurts doesn't make sense and nor does this

The best thing anyone can do is vote - if every single person who didn't vote actually went out and voted for someone different the system would change immediately. Literally overnight.

As it stands, the two main parties don't actually want you to vote... It means the Tories can concentrate on their core votes, the pensioners and the rich and Labour can concentrate on the Unions.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 31 Mar 15 9.43am

[Link]

Coke head's record this term.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
EricYoung'sSweatBand Flag 31 Mar 15 9.50am

Quote Willo at 31 Mar 2015 9.39am

Quote nickgusset at 31 Mar 2015 9.30am

Quote Willo at 31 Mar 2015 9.23am

Quote nickgusset at 31 Mar 2015 9.18am

Sorry, but Cameron was castigated for his 3k higher taxes comments. Check out the fallout from what your dear leader days before parroting.

NOT castigated by me ! Others are free to say what they wish, we live in a 'Free' country.



But the comments are without foundation.. .

[Link]

Are you just blindly ignoring this?

I don't read the 'Guardian', I am a 'Mail' and 'Telegraph' reader but I have read the link.

Ed Miliband categorically said that £15 billion of savings will come from taxation. When you consider the working families of this country this equates to £3K for the following parliament.

How many working households are there in Britain?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 31 Mar 15 9.52am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 31 Mar 2015 9.43am

[Link]

Coke head's record this term.

Ignoring the risible reference to Osborne, I could also provide a plethora of statistics which would also bore all and sundry on here.

Anyway, I am spending far too much time on here - I need to get on the campaign trail ! Off my "Soapbox" for now as I need to get out and about !!!!


Edited by Willo (31 Mar 2015 9.59am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 10 of 18 < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Who has the numbers needed to govern?