Why is Sky so dismissive of the smaller sides?
There were twenty minutes of chat after tonight’s game, with the pundits, the Spurs manager and Son.
Not a single thing about Palace.
Before the match they showed the Spurs line-up first, even though we're the home team!
If Sky thinks only supporters of big clubs are worth catering for, perhaps they should charge the rest of us lower subscriptions.

When match officials & media come to SP, what happens:
Match officials get changed in a portacabin -
Meedia get to use a room off of the family bar before the game & then the match commentary team climb up the gantry in the AW -

How are they treated at top 6 stadiums ?

No wonder there is a bias, even if its an unconscious one.

Maybe when we have the new main stand the facilities offered to these visitors will be better & then we can perhaps hope for a more even playing field with how they treat us.

This is also true, but, not to worry, Sky have just won a 'Diversity' award & are very keen to let people know about it.

This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Been like that for years.

Thanks to Neville and Carragher it’s all bout Man U and Liverpool even when they are not playing.

Carragher in particular annoys me - useless and biased pundit and commentator - so little different to when he was a player then..!!

What really gets me is when he talks about Englands “Golden Generation” as if he was a major part of it - no Jamie you were a squad member at best and often not even that..!!

Anyway after the “spit the dog” incident shouldn’t be anywhere near the Sky commentary/punditry team..!!

COYP

The benefit of sky is that the subscription includes free of charge foreign language during commentary even though It is not possible to decipher quite what language is spoken.......foc spitting and throat snot clearing sounds are also included.