This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Matt Hancock
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 HeathMan  Purley 16 Nov 22 8.51pm |
   |
|---|---|
|
I have heard that he is popular for bush tucker trials. The question is Will the public keep voting for him to stay and get more trials, and should I find a bookmaker to give me odds on him being in the last four or King of the Jungle?
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 16 Nov 22 9.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I'm not watching it but do you mean Matt?
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 16 Nov 22 9.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Nick Hancock, now that's a blast from the past. Wouldn't mind seeing him in the jungle....probably a whole lot less annoying than Matt.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dan Theolmesdaleroad Up north 16 Nov 22 9.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
I'm not watching it but do you mean Matt? I thought it was all over for him for a minute, but it seems it isn't yet. Yes, HeathMan must mean Matt Hancock (and I'm not watching it either!). Edited by Dan Theolmesdaleroad (16 Nov 2022 9.41pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 16 Nov 22 11.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Dan Theolmesdaleroad
I thought it was all over for him for a minute, but it seems it isn't yet. Yes, HeathMan must mean Matt Hancock (and I'm not watching it either!). Edited by Dan Theolmesdaleroad (16 Nov 2022 9.41pm) Could of been worse he could of said Tony.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| YT Oxford 17 Nov 22 8.24am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by HeathMan
I have heard that he is popular for bush tucker trials. The question is Will the public keep voting for him to stay and get more trials, and should I find a bookmaker to give me odds on him being in the last four or King of the Jungle? Well public voting to keep people in hasn't started yet, whereas public voting for who faces the trials has now finished. So the answer to both parts of your question is "no".
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| YT Oxford 17 Nov 22 8.47am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Dan Theolmesdaleroad
Yes, HeathMan must mean Matt Hancock (and I'm not watching it either!). Edited by Dan Theolmesdaleroad (16 Nov 2022 9.41pm)
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Slimey Toad  Karsiyaka, North Cyprus 17 Nov 22 9.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
Sheila has a very Aussie flavour
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| YT Oxford 17 Nov 22 9.27am |
|
|---|---|
|
Did anyone read the news story yesterday saying that Ofcom had received over 2,000 complaints about IACGMOOH? Just over half were complaining that Matt Hancock was participating. Ofcom issued a statement saying that it has no jurisdiction over whom broadcasters choose to include in their programmes, but should they include someone whose mere presence is likely to offend, then they are responsible for taking mitigating action. Presumably this means not letting extreme views go unchallenged etc etc. Most of the remainder were about the way Matt Hancock was being treated by other contestants.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 17 Nov 22 9.31am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by YT
Did anyone read the news story yesterday saying that Ofcom had received over 2,000 complaints about IACGMOOH? Just over half were complaining that Matt Hancock was participating. Ofcom issued a statement saying that it has no jurisdiction over whom broadcasters choose to include in their programmes, but should they include someone whose mere presence is likely to offend, then they are responsible for taking mitigating action. Presumably this means not letting extreme views go unchallenged etc etc. Most of the remainder were about the way Matt Hancock was being treated by other contestants. Never watched it, I understand that Boy George has been giving Hancock a hard time no doubt trying to deflect attention away from his own bad behaviour in the past.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Goal Machine  The Cronx 17 Nov 22 1.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Must admit I've been dipping in and out (the shame) - mostly to watch the bushtucker (?) trials. To be fair to Hancock, he's was initially nominated by the public for all the trials - he's got on with it in good humour with minimal fuss, collecting maximum stars most of the time. It's become boring viewing as he's so good (probably a shrewd and deliberate tactic) and he's no longer being picked on by the public. Chris Moyles seems to be the new public target as he squirms so badly during the trials. Hancock made a decent account of himself so far and it wouldn't surprise me if he came close to winning. Might not be the worst career move after all. This sort of TV dross appeals to large numbers.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 becky over the moon 17 Nov 22 3.27pm |
|
|---|---|
|
It was no good, that thread title was driving me mad.......
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.