This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Lanzo-Ad Lanzarote 19 Sep 22 8.48am | |
---|---|
What has happened to the UK in the last 70 years, i know other countries have deteriorated as well, but i think no major country has as much as the Uk, if you agree who's is to blame, is it the Politician's or just changing human nature.
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 19 Sep 22 11.16am | |
---|---|
Post WW2 change was inevitable: The country was exhausted financially politically and economically, you can't fight a global war for freedom and keep an empire. The class system finally broke down as people were no longer prepared to show deference to their betters and why should they. They had just spent 6 years fighting a bloody war for freedom. However none of the above meant that the UK of today was inevitable. Post war governments of all parties failed us: Mass immigration (never asked for by the people of this country). Suez Canal debacle a national humiliation. The permissive society. I am not against it but the political solution was to throw free money (benefits) at the problem leading to feckless mothers and fathers and a breakdown in the family unit. The benefits society and the entitled brigade. Failure to modernise industry / management and union practices. by investing in training and new technology. Britain became the sick man of Europe because we were smug and complacent after all we had just won the war. Group think amongst the establishment elite leading to poor decision making. Thatcher was the last leader who challenged the status quo. Meanwhile countries like Japan also had to recover but their solutions were very different and far more practical. We have been failed by the ruling class who perpetuate the myth that there was no alternative.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lanzo-Ad Lanzarote 19 Sep 22 11.48am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Post WW2 change was inevitable: The country was exhausted financially politically and economically, you can't fight a global war for freedom and keep an empire. The class system finally broke down as people were no longer prepared to show deference to their betters and why should they. They had just spent 6 years fighting a bloody war for freedom. However none of the above meant that the UK of today was inevitable. Post war governments of all parties failed us: Mass immigration (never asked for by the people of this country). Suez Canal debacle a national humiliation. The permissive society. I am not against it but the political solution was to throw free money (benefits) at the problem leading to feckless mothers and fathers and a breakdown in the family unit. The benefits society and the entitled brigade. Failure to modernise industry / management and union practices. by investing in training and new technology. Britain became the sick man of Europe because we were smug and complacent after all we had just won the war. Group think amongst the establishment elite leading to poor decision making. Thatcher was the last leader who challenged the status quo. Meanwhile countries like Japan also had to recover but their solutions were very different and far more practical. We have been failed by the ruling class who perpetuate the myth that there was no alternative. A Very Good write up, i would think agreed by 90% of people who had families in the 50s/60s whatever their religion, colour or Creed
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 19 Sep 22 12.01pm | |
---|---|
I've been reading of our appalling behaviour in Kenya, no wonder we left Africa under a cloud. But in 50's Britain you would never have known over a million were put in concentration camps and tortured, later in the 60s the truth began to emerge. Indeed I can remember having nightmares about mau mau chopping up white angelic women and I as had never even seen a black person I would think it applied to all. The 50's were about class, growing consumerism, fading ideals, as a kid what America did we did 6 months later. 'We have been failed by the ruling class who perpetuate the myth that there was no alternative'. I support that, but no regrets about growing up in the 50's.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 19 Sep 22 2.09pm | |
---|---|
So you are an old boy then
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 19 Sep 22 2.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
So you are an old boy then I'm hoping to get a place in the U75s Academy. Just waiting for the paperwork.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
JRW2 Dulwich 19 Sep 22 2.53pm | |
---|---|
Two posters on this thread have referred to "the ruling class", and I genuinely don't know what the phrase is intended to mean. We live in a democracy, which literally means "rule by the people". Nobody else "rules" us - not the monarchy and not even parliament, from which our representatives get thrown out if they sufficiently displease us. Perhaps you have in mind the investment bankers, senior lawyers, senior policemen, "well-connected" individuals, freemasons and the extremely wealthy. I imagine that some of these people would like to rule us, and I suspect that many of them are not averse to pulling strings when they have the opportunity. But I cant accept that this group is responsible for the way our society has developed.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 19 Sep 22 3.31pm | |
---|---|
Personally I think if people want to start understanding why we live in the Britain of 2022, then you need to go back to August 1914 to probably date the tipping point of when our history took a decisive turn. Impossible to say what the alternatives may have been but the world in 1919 was so vastly different to what it was in 1913 with everything turned upside down. Yes, WW2 clearly made a huge difference and you could argue that events such as Suez and so on are pivot points as well but WW1 was sesmic in a way that is difficult to comprehend. Just comparing the names listed on various war memorials in terms of numbers for 1914-18 compared to 1939-45 offers a tiny snap shot of what the impact was on British society.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 19 Sep 22 4.02pm | |
---|---|
Women were the main cause of the changes in the 50's & 60's. With the men away at war, as with WWI, but to a greater extent, women worked - in munitions, on the land, in factories, food production and offices as never before. When the men came home, many were reluctant to go back to the old domestic drudgery that had been, for the main part, their only lot in life, and certainly the younger ones without children grasped their opportunities and refused to give them back. With the 60's and the coming of the pill, even more freedom came their way - no need to worry about 'accidents', shotgun weddings and ties to the kitchen sink to avoid social condemnation - they had control over their bodies - in fact they thought they had it all and made the most of it. Gradually, their new way of life became accepted and the social norms changed accordingly - where once 'the mothers' watched over all the neighbourhood children (theirs and everyone else's), the streets were safe - a battalion of women confronting a stranger hanging around their homes deterred most - and the husband was the breadwinner with the last word at home, now you had the 'latchkey' generation, sexually liberated and financially independent women and the collapse of the old order. With increased social awareness and the advent of benefits for all (50's/60's you still depended on your family or neighbours in a crisis as there was a stigma attached to 'handouts') the whole nature of society changed and then seemed to go on a downward spiral as the achievers achieved and the rest went to pot when they found someone else would pick up the bill...... ......and no, I don't think we should go back to the old regime, just sort out the present one!
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Lanzo-Ad Lanzarote 19 Sep 22 4.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by JRW2
Two posters on this thread have referred to "the ruling class", and I genuinely don't know what the phrase is intended to mean. We live in a democracy, which literally means "rule by the people". Nobody else "rules" us - not the monarchy and not even parliament, from which our representatives get thrown out if they sufficiently displease us. Perhaps you have in mind the investment bankers, senior lawyers, senior policemen, "well-connected" individuals, freemasons and the extremely wealthy. I imagine that some of these people would like to rule us, and I suspect that many of them are not averse to pulling strings when they have the opportunity. But I cant accept that this group is responsible for the way our society has developed. Ahh, may favorite subject, Oddfellow.
“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Palace Old Geezer Midhurst 19 Sep 22 4.41pm | |
---|---|
As a big fan of Talking Pictures TV, I watch a fair amount of old 1950s British films and TV series and it's fascinating to see how few vehicles were on the roads, how few ethnic faces were among the casts or population in general, how well people dressed, how many bobbys were on the streets and how many bombed and war damaged buildings still existed. Most of the aggravation and crime was carried out by indigenous, home grown villains rather than foreign terrorists or immigrant gangs. Communication generally was slower by phone from the occasional box rather than instant mobile calls or texts. Of course there have been many positive developments in technology and transport etc which have contributed to change. Lanzo, it could be said that our country's culture has been impacted by political influence or weakness, but whilst this is a factor, it is also a fact that we were still slowly recovering from the ravages of a world war that caused immeasurable damage to the infrastructure and people's state of mind. However you view it, the changes that have occurred during the last 70 years, since the 50s, are immense. And not necessarily for the better. Those of us old enough to have lived through the 50s recognise this only too well.
Dad and I watched games standing on the muddy slope of the Holmesdale Road end. He cheered and I rattled. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 19 Sep 22 4.53pm | |
---|---|
Many who fought in wars , they fought to defend the uk from an invasion. To defend against the loss of the nation.
We now have iPhones but we are poorer today. The average working man had more status & respect than he ever gets today. Edited by PalazioVecchio (19 Sep 2022 4.58pm)
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.