You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Social media could consider this........
November 24 2024 1.28am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Social media could consider this........

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

  

HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 14 Jul 21 12.31am Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

All social media accounts require a verification of identity.

Users can opt to have their posts put up anonymously.

Users can opt to not receive anything from posters who have opted to post anonymously.

Of course not ideal but would mean that racist posts for example could only be seen from accounts that hd not opted for anonymity.

Likely most users would opt not to receive anything from anonymous users so there would only be a tiny audience for anonymous posts.

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Matov Flag 14 Jul 21 5.56am Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Because some millionaire footballers got called a few rude names on Twitter? In a majority of messages from over-seas and even when taken as a total, were a minute % of football-related social media posts?

And why limit it to racism? What about posts that mock disabled people? Or Trans? Or any and everything else that people do not like?

Perhaps we should only be able to post positive messages? Encouraging each other?

For f*** sake. This is rapidly now become mass hysteria. And all because 3 professional footballers bottled taking penalities? And got called a few rude names in return on Twitter?

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
HKOwen Flag Hong Kong 14 Jul 21 7.30am Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

I agree , only using racism as an example. I am totally against anonymous social media bullying and abuse, no accountability

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Matov Flag 14 Jul 21 8.14am Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by HKOwen

I agree , only using racism as an example. I am totally against anonymous social media bullying and abuse, no accountability

Which is all well and good but where do you draw the line?

So are we allowed to abuse and bully politicians? And who polices that? The social media companies? There was a recent case where a lady had her Twitter account suspended because she mocked the head of the Chinese Communist party.

That was bullying and abuse. Right?

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 14 Jul 21 9.07am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

I think it is essential that people should be allowed to post anomously in the current climate.
You have people hell bent on damaging people for having the 'wrong' opinions. They must be protected.

The fact that a tiny percentage of people abuse this is not grounds to do anything rash. This is a very small problem that is inflated by the media for their own purposes. Then we have politicians, Royals and celebs all lining up to appear virtuous on the back of it. As a result, we are expected to listen to the wisdom of footballers on the subject, emboldened by all the victim attention, and take it seriously, while having to endure the ridiculous sight of said footballers taking a knee for reasons that defy logic and risk ruining the sport.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Matov Flag 14 Jul 21 9.20am Send a Private Message to Matov Add Matov as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

As a result, we are expected to listen to the wisdom of footballers on the subject, emboldened by all the victim attention, and take it seriously, while having to endure the ridiculous sight of said footballers taking a knee for reasons that defy logic and risk ruining the sport.

Quite.

Based on their supposed principles I struggle to see how a single England player who took the knee will not be boycotting the 2022 world cup in Qatar. A nation that represents everything I guess they find reprensible.

 


"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 14 Jul 21 9.21am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

For decades girls get raped by grooming gangs and both the media, institutions and the government want it kept quiet and even now when its raised look to minimise it.

Some millionaires get nasty tweets, some of which are probably hoaxed and we get massive calls for anonymity to be stripped from the Internet.

People could be forgiven for spotting a trend.

Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Jul 2021 9.22am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 14 Jul 21 9.29am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Matov

Quite.

Based on their supposed principles I struggle to see how a single England player who took the knee will not be boycotting the 2022 world cup in Qatar. A nation that represents everything I guess they find reprensible.


The Qatar World Cup is a scandal from beginning to end and no country should be playing there.
No one is protesting because the people that artifically create the environments that drive public perceptions are the same people who will be making money from the tournament.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 14 Jul 21 9.30am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Matov

Quite.

Based on their supposed principles I struggle to see how a single England player who took the knee will not be boycotting the 2022 world cup in Qatar. A nation that represents everything I guess they find reprensible.

One of the main identifiers of a virtue signaler is that the position taken doesn't cost them....or costs them less than not taking the position.

As soon as the situation changes where a stance does cost them more.....suddenly they find reasons to support the hypocrisy.

You see it with corporations, who are incredibly woke in the west but when it comes to dealing with China they will submit to them without issue..

China break pretty much all their 'progressive' ideas and they are willing to call people in the west Nazis who don't even come close to supporting what China do.....but not submitting to China would cost them.

It shows the underbelly of what these people truly are.

You see it with the football industry with Qatar and the world cup.

Money talks, bs walks.

Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Jul 2021 9.35am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 14 Jul 21 9.36am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger


The Qatar World Cup is a scandal from beginning to end and no country should be playing there.
No one is protesting because the people that artifically create the environments that drive public perceptions are the same people who will be making money from the tournament.

Spot on mate.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
YT Flag Oxford 14 Jul 21 10.07am Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

For decades girls get raped by grooming gangs and both the media, institutions and the government want it kept quiet and even now when its raised look to minimise it.

Some millionaires get nasty tweets, some of which are probably hoaxed and we get massive calls for anonymity to be stripped from the Internet.

People could be forgiven for spotting a trend.

Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Jul 2021 9.22am)


Fair comment, although the OP wasn't suggesting that anonymity be stripped from the internet. The suggestion was a mechanism for choosing not to see posts from those who have chosen anonymity, which is a formal version of: "if you don't like it, don't read it".

Regarding verification of identity to set up a social media account; this wouldn't bother me, but I assume it would be a non-starter. Firstly, the task of obtaining ID from the hundreds of millions of existing users would be immense, and secondly the number of users would no doubt plummet. Furthermore, whereas the plod would no doubt be empowered to pursue accusations of hate crimes committed online by UK citizens or by citizens of countries with whom the UK has reciprocal arrangements, who would follow up on abuse issued from China, Russia, etc?

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 14 Jul 21 10.15am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by YT


Fair comment, although the OP wasn't suggesting that anonymity be stripped from the internet. The suggestion was a mechanism for choosing not to see posts from those who have chosen anonymity, which is a formal version of: "if you don't like it, don't read it".

Regarding verification of identity to set up a social media account; this wouldn't bother me, but I assume it would be a non-starter. Firstly, the task of obtaining ID from the hundreds of millions of existing users would be immense, and secondly the number of users would no doubt plummet. Furthermore, whereas the plod would no doubt be empowered to pursue accusations of hate crimes committed online by UK citizens or by citizens of countries with whom the UK has reciprocal arrangements, who would follow up on abuse issued from China, Russia, etc?

Yep sensible points.

To be fair to the OP my post wasn't in relation to his as I had only seen the last few posts in the thread.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Social media could consider this........