This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Qwijibo Bournemouth 17 Sep 19 7.46pm | |
---|---|
Ben Stokes attacks 'despicable' Sun story about family tragedy The England cricketer Ben Stokes has described a front-page article in the Sun newspaper about a family tragedy 31 years ago as “disgusting” and “immoral”. In a statement on Twitter on Tuesday, Stokes said the paper’s decision to publish the story would have “grave and lifelong consequences” for his mother, in particular. He claimed the story, which was also picked up by Mail Online, contained a number of serious inaccuracies. “Today the Sun has seen fit to publish extremely painful, sensitive and personal details concerning events in the private lives of my family, going back more than 31 years,” he wrote. “It is hard to find words that adequately describe such low and despicable behaviour, disguised as journalism. I cannot conceive of anything more immoral, heartless or contemptuous to the feelings and circumstances of my family.” Stokes criticised the article as “the lowest form of journalism, focused only on chasing sales” and asked people to respect his family’s privacy and right to home life. “To use my name as an excuse to shatter the privacy and private lives of – in particular – my parents is utterly disgusting,” he wrote. The article described in detail events in New Zealand 31 years ago, before he was born, when his mother’s ex-husband killed their two children before taking his own life. Stokes said a reporter had turned up at his parents’ home in New Zealand “out of the blue” to ask them about the tragedy. The Sun reported that the couple and the cricketer had declined to comment. In his statement, Stokes said his own public profile was not an excuse to “invade” the rights and privacy of his family members. He added: “This is the lowest form of journalism, focused only on chasing sales with absolutely no regard for the devastation caused to lives as a consequence. It is totally out of order.” Tom Harrison, the England and Wales Cricket Board chief executive, also condemned the decision to publish the article. “We, like the wider sporting world, are disgusted and appalled at the actions taken in revealing the tragic events from Ben’s past. We are saddened that an intrusion of this magnitude was deemed necessary in order to sell newspapers or secure clicks,” he said. “Ben’s exploits this summer have cemented his place in cricket’s history. We are sure the whole sport, and the country, stands behind him in support.” There was also support for Stokes from other cricketers and fans on Twitter. The England test captain, Joe Root, retweeted his teammate’s statement and urged people to “please take the time to read this and respect it”. Hacked Off, the campaign for media accountability, said: “This is an appalling invasion of privacy with no public interest justification. We have been told repeatedly by newspaper editors that ‘everything has changed’ since the Leveson report seven years ago. It is abundantly clear that nothing has changed. Some newspapers are just as incapable of abiding by principles of human decency and basic journalistic ethics as they were during the phone-hacking scandal.” A spokeswoman for the Sun said: “The Sun has the utmost sympathy for Ben Stokes and his mother but it is only right to point out the story was told with the cooperation of a family member who supplied details, provided photographs and posed for pictures. The tragedy is also a matter of public record and was the subject of extensive front-page publicity in New Zealand at the time. “The Sun has huge admiration for Ben Stokes and we were delighted to celebrate his sporting heroics this summer. He was contacted prior to publication and at no stage did he or his representatives ask us not to publish the story.” Stokes is the runaway favourite to be named BBC Sports Personality of the Year in December, having helped England win the World Cup in July before playing a starring role in the drawn Ashes series. His unbeaten 135 to turn what looked like certain defeat into a memorable one-wicket third Ashes test win over Australia at Headingley was hailed as one of the greatest batting displays of all time. Twelve months ago, Stokes was cleared of affray at a court in Bristol after a high-profile trial that followed a late-night brawl. Go on, admit it, who looked up the Sun story after reading this... (I didn't I would add)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
chris123 hove actually 17 Sep 19 7.56pm | |
---|---|
Not speaking to Stokes is poor, speaking to a family member is no justification in my view.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 17 Sep 19 8.11pm | |
---|---|
What can we say, the gutter press make money out of people's pain all the time. It's when they pretend to have morality that you have to laugh.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 17 Sep 19 8.33pm | |
---|---|
The Guardian has apologised for saying David Cameron had only felt "privileged pain" over the death of his son. How sick-making the press are.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Fatherken 17 Sep 19 9.48pm | |
---|---|
teach the sun a lesson and stop buying that rag it's a s**t paper anyway
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Invalid user 2019 17 Sep 19 10.44pm | |
---|---|
A scummy paper exploiting someones personal life and challenges to shift a few copies of their worthless rag.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 18 Sep 19 12.40am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Fatherken
teach the sun a lesson and stop buying that rag it's a s**t paper anyway I'm actually flabbergasted to think that in 2019 with all the news sources that are available.That anyone actually walks into a newsagents & spends 20p (or whatever it costs now)on a newspaper. It's like admitting you have a landline phone. (Not a slur at you by the way Father Ken)
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Fatherken 18 Sep 19 9.19am | |
---|---|
I have one of those
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Invalid user 2019 18 Sep 19 9.44am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
I'm actually flabbergasted to think that in 2019 with all the news sources that are available.That anyone actually walks into a newsagents & spends 20p (or whatever it costs now)on a newspaper. It's like admitting you have a landline phone. (Not a slur at you by the way Father Ken) Yes it is becoming rather antiquated isn't it. It's about as 'Blockbuster Video' as you can get in this day and age
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
CrazyBadger Ware 18 Sep 19 10.20am | |
---|---|
I find it hard to believe just how easy it is for these institutions to continue to hide behind the 'Freedom of speech' angle. They feel they can publish anything, however accurate, and are justified in doing so because they are journalists. They prefer to publish then apologise, rather than not publish at all. something has to change. They cannot be allowed to control or affect peoples lives in the way they are now. Stokes' family (I don't know what has been alleged, and I'm not going to the Sun to find out) has been tarred by something, and it's likely their lives affected forever just so these people can sell a few papers, or garner a few more clicks. Disgusting. I'm all for proper objective and well researched journalism, but I'm not sure it exists anymore - especially not in the tabloids. Well that got more Rant-y than I was expecting!
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tom-the-eagle Croydon 18 Sep 19 10.36am | |
---|---|
The Sun are uncaring scum bags. Nobody from the paper bothered to ask how the hamster family was feeling after Freddy Starr ate their brother.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
topcat Holmesdale / Surbiton 18 Sep 19 11.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
I'm actually flabbergasted to think that in 2019 with all the news sources that are available.That anyone actually walks into a newsagents & spends 20p (or whatever it costs now)on a newspaper. It's like admitting you have a landline phone. (Not a slur at you by the way Father Ken) I think one a million people still read the paper edition. You are right though, people need to stop clicking on links to their website as well as stopping buying the print version. If people carry on buying the paper or clicking on the links, it endorses what they print.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.