Cucking?

what if you put all your debt in your wife's name ?

Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Not me but if in a hypothetical situation a very wealthy industrialist were to put all of his assets in his wife's name who happens to live in a tax haven wouldn't it be wise of him not to dick around otherwise he could end up penniless but with a very wealthy ex wife.

Perhaps....but apart from the unfairness of that wealth transfer....do we really care?

These people are rarely Elon Musk.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

I think Peter Hain is wrong to use Parliamentary privilege to name and shame.

So far Phillip Green, and I dislike the man, has not been investigated, interviewed, charged or found guilty of any sexual crime.

I am not a fan of non disclosure agreements. The Court of Appeal has studied the evidence and has stated that this is a complex case. Some of the "victims" actually agree with Green and don't want this to become public. Others the court states have taken large sums of money so their evidence maybe tainted.

The bottom line is that judges have decided to uphold his privacy after a lengthy review of the evidence. Peter Gain cannot possibly have access to the same level of detail and yet he has decided he knows more about the case than the judiciary.

If Parliament does not like NDA's then pass a law banning them I would probably agree with that. What Hain has done is the moral equivalent of tarring and feathering someone. No matter how despicable a person Green is we are all entitled to justice and so are the victims who don't want this brought into the public arena.

One more point

It's not right, but it doesn't stop it being f*cking funny.