You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Buckingham Palace terror trial
November 22 2024 2.38pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Buckingham Palace terror trial

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

  

Stirlingsays Flag 30 Jun 18 3.23pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Jury from London fail to reach a verdict on that driver arrested for the planning of a sword attack at Buck house.

Like Douglas Murray says, this country has signed its own suicide note.

This is the letter he wrote to his sister that detectives found:

''To my dearest sister, By the time you read this Insha'Allah [God willing] I will be with Allah.

'Do not cry and be strong. The Shaheed [witness or martyr] will take 70 members of his family with him to paradise. I will take you there Insha'Allah.

'Tell everyone I love them and that they should struggle against the enemies of Allah …The Queen and her soldiers will all be in the hellfire, they go to war with Muslims around the world and kill them without any mercy.'

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
cryrst Flag The garden of England 30 Jun 18 3.59pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Jury from London fail to reach a verdict on that driver arrested for the planning of a sword attack at Buck house.

Like Douglas Murray says, this country has signed its own suicide note.

This is the letter he wrote to his sister that detectives found:

''To my dearest sister, By the time you read this Insha'Allah [God willing] I will be with Allah.

'Do not cry and be strong. The Shaheed [witness or martyr] will take 70 members of his family with him to paradise. I will take you there Insha'Allah.

'Tell everyone I love them and that they should struggle against the enemies of Allah …The Queen and her soldiers will all be in the hellfire, they go to war with Muslims around the world and kill them without any mercy.'

Clearly not enough evidence as it wasn't 35mph in a 30 or racist or anti LGBT.
Only terrorism so no worries Stirling. Maybe they can wait until he does kill someone then say
oops silly us he was a terrorist.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 30 Jun 18 4.22pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Clearly not enough evidence as it wasn't 35mph in a 30 or racist or anti LGBT.
Only terrorism so no worries Stirling. Maybe they can wait until he does kill someone then say
oops silly us he was a terrorist.

Yeah, maybe he should have been on a suspended sentence and filming outside a court.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
YT Flag Oxford 30 Jun 18 4.52pm Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Clearly not enough evidence as it wasn't 35mph in a 30 or racist or anti LGBT.
Only terrorism so no worries Stirling. Maybe they can wait until he does kill someone then say
oops silly us he was a terrorist.

Who is "they"?

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 30 Jun 18 6.15pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by YT

Who is "they"?

Obviously it's the establishment.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
YT Flag Oxford 30 Jun 18 7.24pm Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Obviously it's the establishment.

The establishment has put him on trial. It’s a jury that’s failed to reach a verdict. Are you suggesting that the establishment should have the power to override a criminal court?

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steeleye20 Flag Croydon 30 Jun 18 7.29pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Originally posted by YT

The establishment has put him on trial. It’s a jury that’s failed to reach a verdict. Are you suggesting that the establishment should have the power to override a criminal court?

We don't know what happens in the jury room and that's how it should be.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
martin2412 Flag Living The Dream 30 Jun 18 7.31pm Send a Private Message to martin2412 Add martin2412 as a friend

Originally posted by YT

The establishment has put him on trial. It’s a jury that’s failed to reach a verdict. Are you suggesting that the establishment should have the power to override a criminal court?

Perhaps the bulk of the jury are sympathisers ?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
YT Flag Oxford 30 Jun 18 7.35pm Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by martin2412

Perhaps the bulk of the jury are sympathisers ?

That’s the system, I’m afraid. Your comment could apply to any jury in any court in respect of any defendant, and there’s nowt ‘they’ can do about it.

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
martin2412 Flag Living The Dream 30 Jun 18 7.53pm Send a Private Message to martin2412 Add martin2412 as a friend

Originally posted by YT

That’s the system, I’m afraid. Your comment could apply to any jury in any court in respect of any defendant, and there’s nowt ‘they’ can do about it.

Yep, but as the country becomes more and more Muslim, the likelihood of Muslim terrorists being convicted becomes less and less.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
YT Flag Oxford 30 Jun 18 9.23pm Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by martin2412

Yep, but as the country becomes more and more Muslim, the likelihood of Muslim terrorists being convicted becomes less and less.

What would you suggest as a solution then?

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
martin2412 Flag Living The Dream 30 Jun 18 9.39pm Send a Private Message to martin2412 Add martin2412 as a friend

Originally posted by YT

What would you suggest as a solution then?

I've always thought that the jury system is flawed. The defendant's life could be in the hands of people who have either low intelligence, are racist, are ill-informed, weak, etc etc.

A panel of judges or lawyers should be the decision makers, especially in complex cases imo.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Buckingham Palace terror trial