You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > 2 - 2.5 years jail for child grooming
November 22 2024 5.34pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

2 - 2.5 years jail for child grooming

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

  

Stuk Flag Top half 19 Apr 18 4.51pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

But an 8 year ban from Snapchat, seems to be an extremely bizarre sentence for the crimes committed and admitted.

[Link]

Don't let this descend into a race or religious issue, it's not the point.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Fatherken Flag 19 Apr 18 5.06pm Send a Private Message to Fatherken Add Fatherken as a friend

is that all he will be out in 18 months , should be at least 10 years

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 19 Apr 18 5.13pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by Fatherken

is that all he will be out in 18 months , should be at least 10 years

They, there's four of them. They will be out in those lengths of time as the sentences ranged from 4-5 years but the judge has already told them they "will be released after serving half their sentence, which was already reduced by 155 days."

I'd have thought using the word "potentially" would have been a good idea, if they're model prisoners, rather than confirming it before they've served a day of it.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
aquickgame2 Flag Beni = summer,Caribbean = winter 19 Apr 18 5.40pm Send a Private Message to aquickgame2 Add aquickgame2 as a friend

19 year old men...grooming girls as young as 13.passed them around...sounds familiar !!!

Their names are out in the open,when they get out wonder what might happen to them.

Cut their bollux off with a rusty knife,very very slowly...CNUTS

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 19 Apr 18 5.41pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Originally posted by Stuk

But an 8 year ban from Snapchat, seems to be an extremely bizarre sentence for the crimes committed and admitted.

[Link]

Don't let this descend into a race or religious issue, it's not the point
.

Inevitable that it does. You can't simply discount it.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Oliver Flag Bodega Bay 19 Apr 18 6.03pm Send a Private Message to Oliver Add Oliver as a friend

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

Inevitable that it does. You can't simply discount it.

Substitute grooming gang for pedophile ring and the ethnicity changes

 


I have prepared one of my own time capsules. I have placed some rather large samples of dynamite, gunpowder and nitroglycerin. My time capsule is set to go off in the year 3000. It will show them what we are really like.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 19 Apr 18 6.14pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

Inevitable that it does. You can't simply discount it.

I thought I'd try, however futile it may be.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
simonmdt Flag x 19 Apr 18 6.32pm

I

Originally posted by Stuk

They, there's four of them. They will be out in those lengths of time as the sentences ranged from 4-5 years but the judge has already told them they "will be released after serving half their sentence, which was already reduced by 155 days."

I'd have thought using the word "potentially" would have been a good idea, if they're model prisoners, rather than confirming it before they've served a day of it.


The judge will be fully aware that serving half of a sentence is only possible with good behaviour, if they act otherwise, additional months are added, up to the final sentence.

What people tend not to appreciate is that serving half the time given by a judge is your actual sentence, the second half is there to allow bad behaviour inside to be punished without the need of being charged for something new. No prison can function without the cooperation of the inmates and this is regarded as the best way to keep them in check and onside.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
elgrande Flag bedford 19 Apr 18 7.30pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by Stuk

But an 8 year ban from Snapchat, seems to be an extremely bizarre sentence for the crimes committed and admitted.

[Link]

Don't let this descend into a race or religious issue, it's not the point.

So we can add Burton upon Trent to the ever increasing towns and cities across the land.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 19 Apr 18 7.49pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Stuk

But an 8 year ban from Snapchat, seems to be an extremely bizarre sentence for the crimes committed and admitted.

[Link]

Don't let this descend into a race or religious issue, it's not the point.

Yes, let's pretend they are White in the interest of race relations.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 19 Apr 18 7.55pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by simonmdt

I


The judge will be fully aware that serving half of a sentence is only possible with good behaviour, if they act otherwise, additional months are added, up to the final sentence.

What people tend not to appreciate is that serving half the time given by a judge is your actual sentence, the second half is there to allow bad behaviour inside to be punished without the need of being charged for something new. No prison can function without the cooperation of the inmates and this is regarded as the best way to keep them in check and onside.

I'm sure the judge is fully aware but the public aren't, which was kind of my point. It immediately undermines the perspective of the sentence being just.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stuk Flag Top half 19 Apr 18 7.57pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by elgrande

So we can add Burton upon Trent to the ever increasing towns and cities across the land.

Pretty sure they already made the list.

[Link]

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > 2 - 2.5 years jail for child grooming