What do Spurs thugs have to do to get sent off?

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

What do Spurs thugs have to do to get sent off?

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 1 of 2 1 2 > Last >>

YT Oxford 16 Dec 17 10.40pm
It sounded pretty unequivocal on 5Live, but I thought I would wait until seeing the evidence on MOTD before posting. Evidence if ever it was needed that different rules apply to certain 'top teams'. Could someone please explain why Kane and the perennial thug Ali didn't both get straight red cards for their appalling fouls against Man City? Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)
Alert a moderator to this post

Oxford 16 Dec 17 10.40pm

It sounded pretty unequivocal on 5Live, but I thought I would wait until seeing the evidence on MOTD before posting. Evidence if ever it was needed that different rules apply to certain 'top teams'. Could someone please explain why Kane and the perennial thug Ali didn't both get straight red cards for their appalling fouls against Man City?

Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert a moderator to this post

lefty27 ipswich 16 Dec 17 11.29pm
Ali’s tackle was a disgrace, never liked him since he took a cheap shot on Yohan. Can’t get excited by England with him in the team, hugely overrated and a dirty player. Kane’s tackle was just a poor strikers challenge in my opinion, he doesn’t strike me as dirty but thick as s***. He should win sports personality of the year as most vegetables have more personality as him.
Alert a moderator to this post

lefty27

ipswich 16 Dec 17 11.29pm

Ali’s tackle was a disgrace, never liked him since he took a cheap shot on Yohan. Can’t get excited by England with him in the team, hugely overrated and a dirty player.
Kane’s tackle was just a poor strikers challenge in my opinion, he doesn’t strike me as dirty but thick as s***. He should win sports personality of the year as most vegetables have more personality as him.

Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret 17 Dec 17 10.32am
I thought both of those were red cards. ============ The Ferret ============
Alert a moderator to this post

chateauferret

17 Dec 17 10.32am

I thought both of those were red cards.

============
The Ferret
============

Alert a moderator to this post

Charlie Croker Hampshire 17 Dec 17 10.45am
Originally posted by chateauferret I thought both of those were red cards. Absolutely. The slow motion replay for the Kane challenge does him no favours. Leads with his studs and is off the ground. Calling it a forward's challenge is just making excuses-he deserved a straight red. “My experience of life is that it is not divided up into genres; it’s a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you’re lucky."
Alert a moderator to this post

Charlie Croker

Hampshire 17 Dec 17 10.45am

Send a Private Message to Charlie Croker

Originally posted by chateauferret

I thought both of those were red cards.

Absolutely. The slow motion replay for the Kane challenge does him no favours. Leads with his studs and is off the ground. Calling it a forward's challenge is just making excuses-he deserved a straight red.

“My experience of life is that it is not divided up into genres; it’s a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you’re lucky."

Alert a moderator to this post

ambrose7 Croydon 17 Dec 17 10.52am
Alli gets through about 5 of them a season. How he hasn't got a reputation for that from referee's yet is beyond me. The rule absolutely has to be changed that yellow cards can't be reviewed too. The officials clearly didn't see it properly, or it would have been red. In the same way that the diving system works, if three people independently say that it is a 100% red card, there should be a retrospective ban. Ridiculous that the best player in the league could have had his season ended and all Alli gets is a booking. 26th January 2010 - Enter Administration 2nd May 2010 - D-Day 1 - Survival at Hillsborough 1st June 2010 - D-Day 2 - Survival at Lloyds 7th June 2010 - CPFC2010 exchange contracts.
Alert a moderator to this post

ambrose7

Croydon 17 Dec 17 10.52am

Alli gets through about 5 of them a season. How he hasn't got a reputation for that from referee's yet is beyond me.

The rule absolutely has to be changed that yellow cards can't be reviewed too. The officials clearly didn't see it properly, or it would have been red. In the same way that the diving system works, if three people independently say that it is a 100% red card, there should be a retrospective ban.

Ridiculous that the best player in the league could have had his season ended and all Alli gets is a booking.

26th January 2010 - Enter Administration
2nd May 2010 - D-Day 1 - Survival at Hillsborough
1st June 2010 - D-Day 2 - Survival at Lloyds
7th June 2010 - CPFC2010 exchange contracts.

Alert a moderator to this post

gerry theagle newbury 17 Dec 17 10.58am
Poor refereeing,both red cards.In the end Spurs and the likes of Kane and especially Ali got what they deserved,totally stuffed.
Alert a moderator to this post

gerry theagle

newbury 17 Dec 17 10.58am

Poor refereeing,both red cards.In the end Spurs and the likes of Kane and especially Ali got what they deserved,totally stuffed.

Alert a moderator to this post

PALACE FOR EVER London 17 Dec 17 12.55pm
Studs up, two red cards no doubt. When someone goes in with studs showing he has to come away with the ball cleanly, not touching playing at all. Whether he can be booked for dangerous play even though he doesn't touch the player I don't know. Graham Poll talks about these two incidents and says the Ali is a certain sending off but can understand why the ref gave only a yellow for Kane using the words 'there is no intensity in the challenge' for me this is rubbish as a studs up tackle is deemed as dangerous play, this is a perfect example of why there is inconstancy between refs. He starts talking at 12.12 [Link] The pyramid to beat all pyramids!! [Link] Find out what team is in which division, eg which division is Coppull United in?
Alert a moderator to this post

PALACE FOR EVER

London 17 Dec 17 12.55pm

Send a Private Message to PALACE FOR EVER

Studs up, two red cards no doubt. When someone goes in with studs showing he has to come away with the ball cleanly, not touching playing at all. Whether he can be booked for dangerous play even though he doesn't touch the player I don't know.

Graham Poll talks about these two incidents and says the Ali is a certain sending off but can understand why the ref gave only a yellow for Kane using the words 'there is no intensity in the challenge' for me this is rubbish as a studs up tackle is deemed as dangerous play, this is a perfect example of why there is inconstancy between refs.

He starts talking at 12.12 [Link]

The pyramid to beat all pyramids!!

[Link]

Find out what team is in which division, eg which division is Coppull United in?

Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman Horsham 17 Dec 17 1.10pm
Originally posted by PALACE FOR EVER Studs up, two red cards no doubt. When someone goes in with studs showing he has to come away with the ball cleanly, not touching playing at all. Whether he can be booked for dangerous play even though he doesn't touch the player I don't know. Graham Poll talks about these two incidents and says the Ali is a certain sending off but can understand why the ref gave only a yellow for Kane using the words 'there is no intensity in the challenge' for me this is rubbish as a studs up tackle is deemed as dangerous play, this is a perfect example of why there is inconstancy between refs. He starts talking at 12.12 [Link] I don't think the ref had a clear view of Kane's. There is no logical reason for Alli not getting a straight red except that he plays for Spurs and England and is a media darling. Both of these were worse than Deeney,s. Oh wait, he plays for Watford
Alert a moderator to this post

Spiderman

Horsham 17 Dec 17 1.10pm

Originally posted by PALACE FOR EVER

He starts talking at 12.12 [Link]

I don't think the ref had a clear view of Kane's. There is no logical reason for Alli not getting a straight red except that he plays for Spurs and England and is a media darling. Both of these were worse than Deeney,s. Oh wait, he plays for Watford

Alert a moderator to this post

PALACE FOR EVER London 17 Dec 17 1.46pm
Originally posted by Spiderman I don't think the ref had a clear view of Kane's. There is no logical reason for Alli not getting a straight red except that he plays for Spurs and England and is a media darling. Both of these were worse than Deeney,s. Oh wait, he plays for Watford I'm more annoyed with Poll's comments in relation to Kane not getting a red card who keeps talking about 'the intensity of the challenge'. He sees that Kane clearly goes in the tackle showing his studs which is dangerous play. The pyramid to beat all pyramids!! [Link] Find out what team is in which division, eg which division is Coppull United in?
Alert a moderator to this post

PALACE FOR EVER

London 17 Dec 17 1.46pm

Originally posted by Spiderman

I'm more annoyed with Poll's comments in relation to Kane not getting a red card who keeps talking about 'the intensity of the challenge'. He sees that Kane clearly goes in the tackle showing his studs which is dangerous play.

The pyramid to beat all pyramids!!

[Link]

Find out what team is in which division, eg which division is Coppull United in?

Alert a moderator to this post

Direwolf Lincoln 17 Dec 17 2.08pm
It seems to me that Kane gets away with it because he is seen as a 'nice chap', which to be fair I think he does seem to be. His was an aberration. Deli on the other hand is not a particularly nice chap and thus doesn't deserve any benefit of doubt. I have no explanation for the ref's actions. On the matter of intensity I would imagine that I was not the only one that saw Wilf lose it yesterday after being denied a foul and going after a Leicester player with intent. Luckily I think the ref did not see it having turned toward the play elsewhere.
Alert a moderator to this post

Direwolf

Lincoln 17 Dec 17 2.08pm

It seems to me that Kane gets away with it because he is seen as a 'nice chap', which to be fair I think he does seem to be. His was an aberration.
Deli on the other hand is not a particularly nice chap and thus doesn't deserve any benefit of doubt. I have no explanation for the ref's actions.
On the matter of intensity I would imagine that I was not the only one that saw Wilf lose it yesterday after being denied a foul and going after a Leicester player with intent. Luckily I think the ref did not see it having turned toward the play elsewhere.

Alert a moderator to this post

YT Oxford 17 Dec 17 2.55pm
Originally posted by PALACE FOR EVER I'm more annoyed with Poll's comments in relation to Kane not getting a red card who keeps talking about 'the intensity of the challenge'. He sees that Kane clearly goes in the tackle showing his studs which is dangerous play. Absolute bullsh*t from Poll, which ties in with what I said on my OP about different standards. Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)
Alert a moderator to this post

Oxford 17 Dec 17 2.55pm

Originally posted by PALACE FOR EVER

Absolute bullsh*t from Poll, which ties in with what I said on my OP about different standards.

Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert a moderator to this post