This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Flies Like An Eagle Lagos 09 Dec 17 7.13pm | |
---|---|
With Luka we have a demon penalty taker who has at the moment a 100% record for us. So why was Benteke allowed to take the second penalty just to try and stroke his ego and to avoid himself going on his personal losing streak without scoring in the premiership combined with his abysmal record of missing penalties for Palace. Is it just weak captaincy from Dann or does the blame with the failure of the manager to designate the order of penalty takers in the first place? When I saw Benteke step up to take the penalty I just knew it would all end in tears before bedtime. Grrrr....
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 09 Dec 17 7.17pm | |
---|---|
They are designated. Read posts before starting new threads and duplicate threads discussing what's already been discussed mins ago. Grrrrr. Merge thread please.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jefroc Crete 09 Dec 17 7.18pm | |
---|---|
NEVER allow Benteke take a penalty. Christian DO YOU HEAR ME.YOU HAVE COST PALACE SO MANY POINTS WITH YOYR PRATISH PENALTY BEHAVIOR! GROW UP!!
Always remembering walking from the Holmesdale to the Whitehorse end at half time! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
thechaddyboy Peterborough 09 Dec 17 7.19pm | |
---|---|
I thought this had all been ironed out after he missed the last one, but, in the dying seconds of a hard fought game where 3 points would take us out of the bottom 3 someone should have stood up to him & said 'No' appreciate he wanted to score after such a lengthy dry spell but that was not the time to pull rank. Blokes a selfish fool.
Red & Blue since 73' |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Casual Orpington 09 Dec 17 7.21pm | |
---|---|
If he’s just picked the ball up and taken it, knowing he shouldn’t , he should be fined. £100 million pound fine if we are relegated by 1 or 2 points.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Booted Eagle Bristol 09 Dec 17 7.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Casual
If he’s just picked the ball up and taken it, knowing he shouldn’t , he should be fined. £100 million pound fine if we are relegated by 1 or 2 points. Too small, his wages will probably cover that with some to spare.
“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ” |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Painter Croydon 09 Dec 17 7.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Flies Like An Eagle
With Luka we have a demon penalty taker who has at the moment a 100% record for us. So why was Benteke allowed to take the second penalty just to try and stroke his ego and to avoid himself going on his personal losing streak without scoring in the premiership combined with his abysmal record of missing penalties for Palace. Is it just weak captaincy from Dann or does the blame with the failure of the manager to designate the order of penalty takers in the first place? When I saw Benteke step up to take the penalty I just knew it would all end in tears before bedtime. Grrrr.... Dann wasn't captain, so why are you blaming him. Benteke is at fault, if Luca had taken it and missed nobody would be angry due to his record.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
PalazioVecchio south pole 09 Dec 17 7.46pm | |
---|---|
chosen penalty takers... 1. luka and never Benteke
Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kennybrowns leftfoot Reigate 09 Dec 17 7.54pm | |
---|---|
Hodgson has made it clear in his interview that we have designated penalty takers and Benteke isn't one of them. He was being polite but you could see he was fuming.
Don't waste your time with jealousy. Sometimes your ahead, sometimes your behind, the race is long. But in the end it's only with yourself!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
LegalEagle2010 09 Dec 17 8.11pm | |
---|---|
All this talk about 'designated penalty takers' and 'why didn't Luka just grab it off him' and 'why didn't the captain/ the bench tell Benteke to walk away' is (almost) annoying me as much as what actually happened. Firstly, we clearly do have a designated taker. It is Luka. How can anyone think different. It is the reason why he bloody took the first one despite Benteke being on the pitch. Secondly, as Roy said in one post match interview I have seen, the bench cannot walk onto the pitch and tell the players what to do ... they have already done that in training before the match where they have already designated Luka as our penalty taker. So that leaves the players on the pitch. I was at the game. Luka looked almost inconsolable about what was happening. He stood in the box for ages, pleading with Benteke. He was pulling his shirt up almost over his head in panicked frustration. But Benteke simply stood there, not looking at Luka, blinkers on, refusing to move. So think about what you are saying by stating that Luka/ Dann/ whoever else simply shouldn't have let Benteke take it. Given how it played out, they would have had no option but to PHYSICALLY drag Benteke out of the box. Think about what that would have looked like. A penalty in the last minute, prefaced by a physical altercation involving our players. It would have had to have been that, Benteke was going nowehere. Think about what effect on morale that would have had, how it would have looked in the press. It is simply inconceivable that one professional would wrestle another one out of the box over a penalty. Further, think about the effect it would have had on Luka! The pressure that would have been on him having just physically dragged a team mate out of the box (or alternatively watched someone else do it to Benteke). Even if Benteke had relented to Luka's constant pressure without a physical confrontation (and it was constant pressure -- he demonstratively did not simply acquiesce to Benteke), think about the pressure that would have left on his shoulders. Pressure that would already have been extraordinary given the match situation. Therefore, it is ENTIRELY Benteke's fault as to what happened. Not anyone else's. As I mentioned, even if he had relented, the damage would have been done (in terms of added pressure to Luka). It is the most selfish act I have ever witnessed at Selhurst. I only hope that the journalists and pundits who discuss the incident think about ( a ) the fact that we DO have a penalty taker and not blame it on a false 'confusion'. And ( b ) what they actually mean by saying 'someone should have told Benteke to back off'. They did. He refused. Would they advocate a wrestling match? surely not, the ramifications are so awful. One might think, well, the ramifications would be worth it for Luka to score the penalty for the three points. But, of course, he was not guaranteed to score, and especially not if he was taken it after such a furore. So by the time Benteke took it, I can understand the players thinking 'right ... he's got it now ... so let's back him. It's a penalty so he should score.' I make clear that none of this changes my ultimate view, that how dare Benteke put his own selfish desire to end his drought before his teammates, the club, and the fans. Particularly when he is famously awful at taking bloody penalties in any event. I am beyond angry. But let's direct it in the right, informed, logical place.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 09 Dec 17 8.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by LegalEagle2010
All this talk about 'designated penalty takers' and 'why didn't Luka just grab it off him' and 'why didn't the captain/ the bench tell Benteke to walk away' is (almost) annoying me as much as what actually happened. Firstly, we clearly do have a designated taker. It is Luka. How can anyone think different. It is the reason why he bloody took the first one despite Benteke being on the pitch. Secondly, as Roy said in one post match interview I have seen, the bench cannot walk onto the pitch and tell the players what to do ... they have already done that in training before the match where they have already designated Luka as our penalty taker. So that leaves the players on the pitch. I was at the game. Luka looked almost inconsolable about what was happening. He stood in the box for ages, pleading with Benteke. He was pulling his shirt up almost over his head in panicked frustration. But Benteke simply stood there, not looking at Luka, blinkers on, refusing to move. So think about what you are saying by stating that Luka/ Dann/ whoever else simply shouldn't have let Benteke take it. Given how it played out, they would have had no option but to PHYSICALLY drag Benteke out of the box. Think about what that would have looked like. A penalty in the last minute, prefaced by a physical altercation involving our players. It would have had to have been that, Benteke was going nowehere. Think about what effect on morale that would have had, how it would have looked in the press. It is simply inconceivable that one professional would wrestle another one out of the box over a penalty. Further, think about the effect it would have had on Luka! The pressure that would have been on him having just physically dragged a team mate out of the box (or alternatively watched someone else do it to Benteke). Even if Benteke had relented to Luka's constant pressure without a physical confrontation (and it was constant pressure -- he demonstratively did not simply acquiesce to Benteke), think about the pressure that would have left on his shoulders. Pressure that would already have been extraordinary given the match situation. Therefore, it is ENTIRELY Benteke's fault as to what happened. Not anyone else's. As I mentioned, even if he had relented, the damage would have been done (in terms of added pressure to Luka). It is the most selfish act I have ever witnessed at Selhurst. I only hope that the journalists and pundits who discuss the incident think about ( a ) the fact that we DO have a penalty taker and not blame it on a false 'confusion'. And ( b ) what they actually mean by saying 'someone should have told Benteke to back off'. They did. He refused. Would they advocate a wrestling match? surely not, the ramifications are so awful. One might think, well, the ramifications would be worth it for Luka to score the penalty for the three points. But, of course, he was not guaranteed to score, and especially not if he was taken it after such a furore. So by the time Benteke took it, I can understand the players thinking 'right ... he's got it now ... so let's back him. It's a penalty so he should score.' I make clear that none of this changes my ultimate view, that how dare Benteke put his own selfish desire to end his drought before his teammates, the club, and the fans. Particularly when he is famously awful at taking bloody penalties in any event. I am beyond angry. But let's direct it in the right, informed, logical place. So when your mates pissed and goes to get in his car you don't stop him as it looks bad then and might cause a scene.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
deetee 09 Dec 17 8.32pm | |
---|---|
They are Luca is our penalty taker Benteke muscled in. Benteke has only scored 2 out of 5 pens time to say you will never take another penalty.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.