You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > sagna (free agent- target)
November 22 2024 9.56pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

sagna (free agent- target)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

  

Dan89 Flag Se25 05 Sep 17 6.57am Send a Private Message to Dan89 Add Dan89 as a friend

[Link]

Prefer a striker tbh

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 05 Sep 17 7.23am Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Already a five page thread on him

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Dan89 Flag Se25 05 Sep 17 7.24am Send a Private Message to Dan89 Add Dan89 as a friend

Should midlands eagle - can mods merge thanks

 


Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chateauferret Flag 05 Sep 17 8.44am

Couldn't make it up. One squad place free, one senior striker in the squad, about seven defenders and we want to sign Bacary Sagna.

Absolutely bonkers.

 


============
The Ferret
============

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Slimey Toad Flag Karsiyaka, North Cyprus 05 Sep 17 8.47am Send a Private Message to Slimey Toad Add Slimey Toad as a friend

Laughable and a disgrace (if reports are correct).

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Slimey Toad Flag Karsiyaka, North Cyprus 05 Sep 17 8.48am Send a Private Message to Slimey Toad Add Slimey Toad as a friend

Originally posted by chateauferret

Couldn't make it up. One squad place free, one senior striker in the squad, about seven defenders and we want to sign Bacary Sagna.

Absolutely bonkers.

Yes Chateauferret, we now have seven recognized central defenders (including Kelly)!!!


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Littlebogreek Flag 05 Sep 17 8.58am Send a Private Message to Littlebogreek Add Littlebogreek as a friend

Originally posted by Slimey Toad

Yes Chateauferret, we now have seven recognized central defenders (including Kelly)!!!


He's a right back. We are short in that department in my opinion. Yes we could do with another striker but sitting on the bench at Palace in case Benteke gets injured is a pretty hard sell unless we want to throw 80k a week at someone average. Support the team and try and understand why certain decisions are made rather than just moaning all the time - that isn't directed as a personal attack on you, more an observation at the constant moaning on here.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chateauferret Flag 05 Sep 17 9.05am

Originally posted by Littlebogreek

He's a right back. We are short in that department in my opinion. Yes we could do with another striker but sitting on the bench at Palace in case Benteke gets injured is a pretty hard sell unless we want to throw 80k a week at someone average. Support the team and try and understand why certain decisions are made rather than just moaning all the time - that isn't directed as a personal attack on you, more an observation at the constant moaning on here.

Well we have three vacancies and one opportunity to fill one of them, and we've already had a thread in which most people agreed that support and backup for Benteke was the highest of those priorities. Plenty of people have opined that going into the season with just one senior striker is madness, and so it is. The vacancies are for striker, right back and keeper. We have one of the former and two each of the latter. Do the math.

Edited by chateauferret (05 Sep 2017 9.10am)

 


============
The Ferret
============

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 05 Sep 17 9.08am Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Littlebogreek

Yes we could do with another striker but sitting on the bench at Palace in case Benteke gets injured is a pretty hard sell unless we want to throw 80k a week at someone average.

I think that the general feeling isn't that we should buy / loan a Benteke clone in case he gets injured but perhaps a different style of striker who could come on as a sub to change our style of play

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 05 Sep 17 9.18am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Littlebogreek

He's a right back. We are short in that department in my opinion. Yes we could do with another striker but sitting on the bench at Palace in case Benteke gets injured is a pretty hard sell unless we want to throw 80k a week at someone average. Support the team and try and understand why certain decisions are made rather than just moaning all the time - that isn't directed as a personal attack on you, more an observation at the constant moaning on here.

You're doing it again. We either sign someone for £80k or not. No in between.

Sorry but you lose all credibility with these kind of posts. 1 striker, umpteen defenders, and you excuse it. 'Try and understand why these kind of decisions are made'. No, you understand it. It's ridiculous, and will be very costly if Benteke gets injured.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Littlebogreek Flag 05 Sep 17 9.23am Send a Private Message to Littlebogreek Add Littlebogreek as a friend

Originally posted by chateauferret

Well we have three vacancies and one opportunity to fill one of them, and we've already had a thread in which most people agreed that support and backup for Benteke was the highest of those priorities. Plenty of people have opined that going into the season with just one senior striker is madness, and so it is. The vacancies are for striker, right back and keeper. We have one of the former and two each of the latter. Do the math.

Edited by chateauferret (05 Sep 2017 9.10am)

Yes it is madness and I totally agree that we need another striker be it a different option or a similar player, however I prefer to think that the board did everything they could to secure one but made the decision that of the available options, they didn't provide anything near to value for money. I'd honestly rather use Sako up front than some of the crap we were linked to when you consider the outlay on transfer fee, wages etc

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Littlebogreek Flag 05 Sep 17 9.27am Send a Private Message to Littlebogreek Add Littlebogreek as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

You're doing it again. We either sign someone for £80k or not. No in between.

Sorry but you lose all credibility with these kind of posts. 1 striker, umpteen defenders, and you excuse it. 'Try and understand why these kind of decisions are made'. No, you understand it. It's ridiculous, and will be very costly if Benteke gets injured.

You are misunderstanding me again. If we are going to go out an buy some average player that wont be good enough, why even bother? Just use one of the utility players or some youth. A decent example of a inbetween player is Jordan Mutch - 5 million is fairly modest in this market yet no one on here (including me) would say that was even close to a good idea.

I just think that we are lucky to have a board that actually give a f**k and rather than always assuming the worst we should believe that they did what they could. I'm not blindly following the club and not criticising, I'm a season ticket holder so have to put up with the rubbish week in week out and trust me I moan but you have to be realist too and understand where we are as a club.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > sagna (free agent- target)