This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Consistency.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Southampton_Eagle  At the after party 22 Jan 17 1.13pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Van Dijk goes down, ball in play, not a head injury, a gammy ankle. Ref blows up.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| PALACE FOR EVER London 22 Jan 17 1.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I'm sorry but because football has a lot of decisions that are the opinion of the refs other than 'yes or no ones' like did the ball cross the line you will always get inconsistency. Even when there is slow motion shown in the studio on whether it should of been a penalty you get some saying 'yes' some saying 'no' with their different opinions. I remember a ref (who had stopped reffing) saying you can only expect consistency from the same ref in the same match. Before DRS in cricket LBW decisions were the most talked about as the umpire had to make a decision. 'Dickie' Bird was known as an umpire it was harder to get a batsman out LBW.
The pyramid to beat all pyramids!! Find out what team is in which division, eg which division is Coppull United in? |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Southampton_Eagle At the after party 22 Jan 17 1.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by PALACE FOR EVER
I'm sorry but because football has a lot of decisions that are the opinion of the refs other than 'yes or no ones' like did the ball cross the line you will always get inconsistency. Even when there is slow motion shown in the studio on whether it should of been a penalty you get some saying 'yes' some saying 'no' with their different opinions. I remember a ref (who had stopped reffing) saying you can only expect consistency from the same ref in the same match. Before DRS in cricket LBW decisions were the most talked about as the umpire had to make a decision. 'Dickie' Bird was known as an umpire it was harder to get a batsman out LBW. An offside goal (Saints had one disallowed, as tight as Everton's winner yesterday) I can understand however how can one ref stop play for an ankle injury which the player had played on with after the initial knock five minutes previously, and another ref who lets play go on for a few minutes when the injury, again, isn't a head injury?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| PALACE FOR EVER London 22 Jan 17 3.01pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Southampton_Eagle
An offside goal (Saints had one disallowed, as tight as Everton's winner yesterday) I can understand however how can one ref stop play for an ankle injury which the player had played on with after the initial knock five minutes previously, and another ref who lets play go on for a few minutes when the injury, again, isn't a head injury? Perhaps it was because Schlupp rolled onto the the playing area of the pitch then it isn't a serious injury to stop play. Can I take it that if Shlupp wanted treatment badly he just needed to roll off the pitch.
The pyramid to beat all pyramids!! Find out what team is in which division, eg which division is Coppull United in? |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Pierre  Purley 22 Jan 17 3.16pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Southampton_Eagle
Van Dijk goes down, ball in play, not a head injury, a gammy ankle. Ref blows up. Shlupp slid off the pitch yesterday then decided he was suffering from cramp and grabbed and his toes. He looked around as the was game carrying on down the other end of the pitch and shuffled back onto the edge of the pitch and continued to stretch out his legs. The match officials or Everton players had no compulsion to stop the game and therefore carried on. Had Shlupp been on the field of play at the time in an area of danger referee may have stopped play who knows?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mo Sizlak 22 Jan 17 6.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Southampton_Eagle
Van Dijk goes down, ball in play, not a head injury, a gammy ankle. Ref blows up. If only!
Babs and Clean Willie were in love they said.... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Onions London 22 Jan 17 6.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Agree it's frustrating but we should have done more to get the game stopped if that's getting in the ref's face or hacking someone down so be it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| topcat Holmesdale / Surbiton 23 Jan 17 3.12pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Our ref should have stopped the game when the ball went out for a throw. The ref knew what he was doing and deliberately played on. I'm all for the ref playing on when a player is injured so long as there is consistency and all refs do it.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| alaneagle1 Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 23 Jan 17 3.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by topcat
Our ref should have stopped the game when the ball went out for a throw. The ref knew what he was doing and deliberately played on. I'm all for the ref playing on when a player is injured so long as there is consistency and all refs do it. Are you sure it went out for a throw.
Palace 13th 2017/18. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
chateauferret  23 Jan 17 7.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Meanwhile I thought wtestling a centre forward in your own box meant a penalty, but WTF do I know?
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| topcat Holmesdale / Surbiton 24 Jan 17 7.02am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by alaneagle1
Are you sure it went out for a throw. I was until you asked! Pretty sure it went out for a throw in front of the main stand.
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| leejaneagles 24 Jan 17 10.16am |
|
|---|---|
|
It did go for a throw which was what I was mad about. Fair enough playing on initially because Schlupp wasn't a head injury and rolled back onto the pitch. I wouldn't say this is unsportsmanlike though because just because he rolled back on, it didn't mean he could run back to his position and defend where he should be. He could barely walk for Christ sake! The referee knew we had a man down not due to a red card and therefore in the interest of fairness should have done his upmost to get it back to 11 vs 11 as quickly as possible. That opportunity was the throw-in. Instead, he conciously made the decision he wanted to punish Shlupp for rolling back onto the pitch. I do agree with what someone else posted though. If the ref is being a pretentious little git and Everton are refusing to put the ball out of play, one of our non-booked players should have 'mis-timed' a tackle and got a yellow, allowing every Palace player to run over to Schlupp and refuse to play on. That's the problem with us, we're too nice. If a Man Utd player was down and the ref played on (he wouldn't but let's pretend), Rooney would probably grab the ref, spin him around and point him to the injured player and probably not even get a yellow for it.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.