You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > g4s
November 22 2024 7.53pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

g4s

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

  

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 13 Jan 16 9.20am

How the bloody hell do companies like this keep getting contracts?

[Link]

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Y Ddraig Goch Flag In The Crowd 13 Jan 16 9.25am Send a Private Message to Y Ddraig Goch Add Y Ddraig Goch as a friend

Because they maintain the same standards as pre-privatisation.


Not actuallythat shocking and the way that young offenders are treated contributes massively to their re-offending rate

 


the dignified don't even enter in the game

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Jan 16 9.57am

The prison service has for so long been a bitch to public funding cuts, because ultimately people don't generally give two s**ts about people in prison or youth offenders and think they essentially deserve it. The truth is of course that this massively undermines any attempt at rehabilitation, and results in re-offending and can contribute to escalation of offending as well.

But its generally accepted by the public to cut spending on the prison service above anything else.

I wouldn't particularly blame G4S per se, its indicative of a industry that's laid off or alienated most of its professional trained staff and replaced them with often poorly trained, cheap and often unqualified staff. They just exist to cop the flack that otherwise the government would have to do something about.

An effective criminal justice system requires funding for prisons, rehabilitation, policing and probation services, rather than essentially outsourcing them and using 'statistical manipulations' to deliver 'success rates'.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 13 Jan 16 10.14am

It is not just the prison service. Does anyone remember the debacle concerning security at the London Olympics?

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Jan 16 10.22am

I'm a firm believer that certain functions of state belong entirely in the auspices and funding of the state.

Something like the Olympics had ridiculous security contracts that simply overloaded the security systems (like vetting) by making absurd requirements on staff by government, which it just happens to charge for.

In reality, the expectations placed on G4S for the Olympics were unachievable by anyone, but it allows the government a paid scapegoat that isn't a minister, and G4S is quite happy with this arrangement. In return they profit very nicely from an arrangement that essentially absolves the state of blame.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Murray's the man Flag round ear 13 Jan 16 10.27am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 13 Jan 2016 10.22am

I'm a firm believer that certain functions of state belong entirely in the auspices and funding of the state.

Something like the Olympics had ridiculous security contracts that simply overloaded the security systems (like vetting) by making absurd requirements on staff by government, which it just happens to charge for.

In reality, the expectations placed on G4S for the Olympics were unachievable by anyone, but it allows the government a paid scapegoat that isn't a minister, and G4S is quite happy with this arrangement. In return they profit very nicely from an arrangement that essentially absolves the state of blame.


Security companies see sport events as a cash cow. Lookat the car oark stewards at Palace. All of a sudden you need 30+ people doing the job of 10

 


Johnny will return

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
kennybrowns leftfoot Flag Reigate 13 Jan 16 11.25am Send a Private Message to kennybrowns leftfoot Add kennybrowns leftfoot as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jan 2016 9.20am

How the bloody hell do companies like this keep getting contracts?

[Link]

Just wait until they more or less take over the Police!! Believe me it's what that thing who is the Home Secretary wants.

Lots of rumours that Mrs Mays husband Phillip is a shareholder in G4S... Neither confirmed or denied by her or him... If true surely a conflict of interest?!

 


Don't waste your time with jealousy. Sometimes your ahead, sometimes your behind, the race is long. But in the end it's only with yourself!!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
johnfirewall Flag 13 Jan 16 11.28am Send a Private Message to johnfirewall Add johnfirewall as a friend

Quote kennybrowns leftfoot at 13 Jan 2016 11.25am

Quote nickgusset at 13 Jan 2016 9.20am

How the bloody hell do companies like this keep getting contracts?

[Link]

Just wait until they more or less take over the Police!! Believe me it's what that thing who is the Home Secretary wants.

Lots of rumours that Mrs Mays husband Phillip is a shareholder in G4S... Neither confirmed or denied by her or him... If true surely a conflict of interest?!

Easily obtainable information. Why don't you check first?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 13 Jan 16 11.56am

Blair favoured Capita and I guess Cameron likes G4S.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
topcat Flag Holmesdale / Surbiton 13 Jan 16 11.58am Send a Private Message to topcat Add topcat as a friend

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 13 Jan 2016 9.25am

Because they maintain the same standards as pre-privatisation.


Not actually that shocking and the way that young offenders are treated contributes massively to their re-offending rate

Exactly, and costs (us taxpayers) more in the long run. However that will be a different budget.

 


It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Jan 16 12.02pm

Quote Murray's the man at 13 Jan 2016 10.27am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 13 Jan 2016 10.22am

I'm a firm believer that certain functions of state belong entirely in the auspices and funding of the state.

Something like the Olympics had ridiculous security contracts that simply overloaded the security systems (like vetting) by making absurd requirements on staff by government, which it just happens to charge for.

In reality, the expectations placed on G4S for the Olympics were unachievable by anyone, but it allows the government a paid scapegoat that isn't a minister, and G4S is quite happy with this arrangement. In return they profit very nicely from an arrangement that essentially absolves the state of blame.


Security companies see sport events as a cash cow. Lookat the car oark stewards at Palace. All of a sudden you need 30+ people doing the job of 10

Problem of the Olympics was that even the people working in the hotdog stalls needed to be security cleared... The system of clearance just isn't capable of coping with that level of pressure. It takes several weeks when there is just a normal level of requests.

But yeah the Olympics employed 'security and stewards' on a scale that would make football look tame. Most whom were just average Joes given a day or twos instruction.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 13 Jan 16 12.05pm

Quote topcat at 13 Jan 2016 11.58am

Quote Y Ddraig Goch at 13 Jan 2016 9.25am

Because they maintain the same standards as pre-privatisation.


Not actually that shocking and the way that young offenders are treated contributes massively to their re-offending rate

Exactly, and costs (us taxpayers) more in the long run. However that will be a different budget.

Its a catch-22 if you invest in rehabilitation you're painted in the media as soft on crime, and that results in problems at election. Where as you can put more people in prison, and cut costs, and gain votes.

Problem is the moment you start funding programs aimed at improving prison to fulfil its function, the media will rip you apart for say funding education for convicts but not for students. And that's what drives peoples voting patterns, the media not the reality.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > g4s