I liked both bands but always felt that Blur didn’t really mean it. Oasis were the real deal. As a 14/15 year old at the time, this was the golden era for me.

Not a lot of love for Oasis on here though.

Real question menswe@r v northern uproar?

One supporter of hacking argued that without it "you will do away with the courage and pluck of the game, and I will be bound to bring over a lot of Frenchmen who would beat you with a week's practice -Blackheath secretary at first meeting of the F.A

Favoured the jaunty Pop hits of Blur at the time. Got into Oasis after the hype had died down. Got back in to Blur turn of the millennium, saw them at Hyde Park a few years later, then Oasis' last gig at Wembley, now I think Blur are lefty bellends and have grown a bit tired of Oasis.

Agreed Nick, but Noel G has a knack for tweaking (plagiarising if you like)songs/riffs that you know you've heard before and he revamps them into something exciting. It's a bit Beatles vs. The Stones,one clean 'n' pop-ish the other dirty n mean. Oasis also have a bit of a 1970s feel about them. [Link] Ollie's Dad,Ash.

Red and Blue Army!
LONDON BORN PALACE BRED LIVE AND DIE FOR BLUE AND RED
Football is not just a game, its a religion

His appendix, which had actually been removed at the time.

The answer is Pulp or the Auteurs (Or Suede with Bernard Butler, who just about smashed everything Oasis and Blur did in one album).

I prefer Lush (or Echobelly) to either Blur or Oasis. Both are massively over rated on the basis of popularity - They're bands indicative of more talented musicians of their time, who never grew tired of stealing a ride on the bandwagon.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]