This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 13 Aug 24 4.22pm | |
---|---|
The UBS are saying that due to the heralded changes soon to be introduced by Labour that the UK will continue to lose many millionaires. Giving off the impression that we could be in for a 'Hollande' type experience of wealth flight where we actually end up with less tax and thus worse public services. Apparently under the changes when earning £500k, you pay £211,203 in Income Tax. To replace that 28 more need to earn 50k (£7,486 tax each)
Attachment: wealthchange.JPG (79.45Kb)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
YT Oxford 13 Aug 24 4.30pm | |
---|---|
Not meant as a criticism, Stirling me old mucker, but are they gunning for 'wealth' (when you say "millionaires" ) or income, as you suggest with your example? I accept that an income of £500k pa will mean the person is going to be a millionaire regardless, but you can easily be a millionaire these days without much of an income. That's certainly my situation and doubtless the situation of our resident troll, with his property empire of Robbie Fowler proportions. Edited by YT (13 Aug 2024 4.31pm)
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 13 Aug 24 4.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by YT
Not meant as a criticism, Stirling me old mucker, but are they gunning for 'wealth' (when you say "millionaires" ) or income, as you suggest with your example? I accept that an income of £500k pa will mean the person is going to be a millionaire regardless, but you can easily be a millionaire these days without much of an income. That's certainly my situation and doubtless the situation of our resident troll, with his property empire of Robbie Fowler proportions. Edited by YT (13 Aug 2024 4.31pm) I certainly don't take that as a criticism as you are right. Even without a hefty income due to the inflation we have seen over our lifetimes...people's homes, paid for over decades of hard work, can now easily make people 'asset' millionaires when their incomes are anything but. You know that today's weird brew of neoliberal/socialists are licking their lips over wealth that can't run off. However the globalism they otherwise adore will always hurt their grand designs....kind of an irony really.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 13 Aug 24 5.58pm | |
---|---|
The UK has had very little investment, necessary to produce growth, particularly since the vote in 2016, but since the banking crisis of 2008 so it bumps along the bottom, stagnating. Millionaires, wealthy bankers etc. are not beneficial to the economy unless they invest and spend in it, but rather they accumulate which the system incentifies them to do through all the tax breaks they get. you are really subsidising their wealth. Re-distribution of this gradually into the system would put money into the pockets of people who spend, from the people who do not, creating demand for goods and services. 'There is no direct link between savings and investment'- Keynes. Ultimately one of the crop of chancellors is going to have to tax wealth, if only because they actually have it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 13 Aug 24 6.11pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The UK has had very little investment, necessary to produce growth, particularly since the vote in 2016, but since the banking crisis of 2008 so it bumps along the bottom, stagnating. Millionaires, wealthy bankers etc. are not beneficial to the economy unless they invest and spend in it, but rather they accumulate which the system incentifies them to do through all the tax breaks they get. you are really subsidising their wealth. Re-distribution of this gradually into the system would put money into the pockets of people who spend, from the people who do not, creating demand for goods and services. 'There is no direct link between savings and investment'- Keynes. Ultimately one of the crop of chancellors is going to have to tax wealth, if only because they actually have it.
All property is theft.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 13 Aug 24 7.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
The UK has had very little investment, necessary to produce growth, particularly since the vote in 2016, but since the banking crisis of 2008 so it bumps along the bottom, stagnating. Millionaires, wealthy bankers etc. are not beneficial to the economy unless they invest and spend in it, but rather they accumulate which the system incentifies them to do through all the tax breaks they get. you are really subsidising their wealth. Re-distribution of this gradually into the system would put money into the pockets of people who spend, from the people who do not, creating demand for goods and services. 'There is no direct link between savings and investment'- Keynes. Ultimately one of the crop of chancellors is going to have to tax wealth, if only because they actually have it.
Edited by steeleye20 (13 Aug 2024 5.59pm) These communist policies have of course been tried before. When Wilson and Healy put the highest tax rate at 83%, the wealthy people just moved their money and/or themselves abroad. When the Tories reduced corporation tax they found that income from it was higher than under the old higher rates because it wasn't worth the time and cost of companies to use schemes to avoid it. When your approach has been adopted by full-blown socialist/communist economies, it resulted in standards of living that you and your ilk would find totally unacceptable. In the USSR, Mao's China, and still in North Korea, people were reduced to starvation with accompanying cannibalism of children. A small price to pay I guess in building the great socialist utopia.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
orpingtoneagle Orpington 13 Aug 24 7.21pm | |
---|---|
The super wealthy can afford to live where they want to and pay tax pretty much at will. Will they all leave? Maybe. The financial sector and stock market were supposed to be decimated by Brexit and that did not happen. So far the tax and investment policies suggested for example changes to IHT would have little effects on the super rich as they can simply organise their affairs to bypass them. Taxing the super rich is quite a difficult thing to do
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 13 Aug 24 11.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by YT
Not meant as a criticism, Stirling me old mucker, but are they gunning for 'wealth' (when you say "millionaires" ) or income, as you suggest with your example? I accept that an income of £500k pa will mean the person is going to be a millionaire regardless, but you can easily be a millionaire these days without much of an income. That's certainly my situation and doubtless the situation of our resident troll, with his property empire of Robbie Fowler proportions. Edited by YT (13 Aug 2024 4.31pm) The troll does not have an " empire ", he likes to give the false impression he has some kind of super business success. That "success" is such his wife still has to work all hours in the NHS as he often reminds us. Expedite the ignore button
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 13 Aug 24 11.22pm | |
---|---|
The Laffer Curve explains that higher tax rates do not result in more tax revenue. This does not suit the left wing ideology of punishing wealth for the sake of it even though it means less overall revenue.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 14 Aug 24 12.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HKOwen
The troll does not have an " empire ", he likes to give the false impression he has some kind of super business success. That "success" is such his wife still has to work all hours in the NHS as he often reminds us. Expedite the ignore button So he has time for bowls and chatting to racist Dave down the pub !
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.