I agree but I thought he might get a red as the challenge could have been deemed “out of control”.
My biggest gripe about the decisions last night was no penalty for challenge on Olise, hardly a VAR check, perhaps we need someone in the refs ear, all game like Neves.
Even read some Wolves fans saying how the ref constantly stopping the game, played into their hands and did not help Palace at all.
I believe the VAR official was the ref from Saturday, he obviously does not like Palace

I agree but I thought he might get a red as the challenge could have been deemed “out of control”.
My biggest gripe about the decisions last night was no penalty for challenge on Olise, hardly a VAR check, perhaps we need someone in the refs ear, all game like Neves.
Even read some Wolves fans saying how the ref constantly stopping the game, played into their hands and did not help Palace at all.
I believe the VAR official was the ref from Saturday, he obviously does not like Palace

It's a gripe as old as time so I have tried to refrain from expressing it however I will say that it seemed as though the officials were intent on accommodating Wolves' non-footballing tactics yesterday and seeing through their win.

As no contact was made a Yellow was the correct decision . The referee would have deemed it as reckless play (yellow) rather than dangerous play or using excessive force (red).He could have seen it as careless play and not given any card at all

It was actually for me borderline if it was even a penalty ,Ive no complaints that it was but was one of those that had it not been given would not have been overturned

The one on Olise was never a pen. It was a 50:50 ball which the Wolves defender got to first and shielded with Olise tripping on his leg. For Olise to be fouled he surely has to be in possession? He never got to the ball.

I think the ref got the Johnston decision correct. Initially I was annoyed as he got the ball, but rules are rules with studs up. It was reckless.