This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Rudi Hedman Caterham 28 Apr 22 3.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Hmm, when I first entered HOL every other post was about smashing some poor woman's "back door" in. I have not seen that delightful comment for some time. Slipping standards? On point, a clumsy tactic appears to have been applied by ex Clarendon School boys of highlighting the supposed innate superiority of Eton/Oxbridge over NVQ Level 2 from Stockport College. Of Oxford Union debating skills over the Northern slapper whose only weapon in the face of such natural, entitled, superiority is to flash her bits. A tactic that has horribly backfired. Now the focus is not on the supposed gulf in ability but in the fact that the Tory party is stuffed to the gunwales with privileged, mysogonistic males educated in all boy environments who lack any understanding of the other half of the population. Did they not realise that that other half of the population also votes? Basically, morons unjustly benefiting from serious investment in their education by rich third parties who are bred to genuinely believe in their divine right to rule. I pretty much agree and these current tories are turning me off voting for them until they’re replaced, but I also now question why Rayner is wearing dresses with slits so high that almost show her bush. Why as a shadow cabinet minister?
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
regpaddock Suffolk 29 Apr 22 11.02am | |
---|---|
I'm only posting this so my mate can see the photo
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 29 Apr 22 12.20pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I pretty much agree and these current tories are turning me off voting for them until they’re replaced, but I also now question why Rayner is wearing dresses with slits so high that almost show her bush. Why as a shadow cabinet minister? Well I rather enjoyed the view. The question really is whether it was a wardrobe malfunction or purposeful. Lots of people wear dresses like that, but not open to the world.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 29 Apr 22 12.41pm | |
---|---|
I'm convinced Rayner is a million times more popular than Starmer. She should be leader in my opinion. And this won't hurt.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HeathMan Purley 08 May 22 12.11am | |
---|---|
Jason Perry cannot do two jobs. There has to be a by-election in the ward he would had represented had he not achieved mayor status. Perhaps Starmer and Rayner will be campaigning in South Croydon next month.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 08 May 22 12.22am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by HeathMan
Jason Perry cannot do two jobs. There has to be a by-election in the ward he would had represented had he not achieved mayor status. Perhaps Starmer and Rayner will be campaigning in South Croydon next month. Running on the Strainer ticket.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 08 May 22 12.45am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I'm convinced Rayner is a million times more popular than Starmer. She should be leader in my opinion. And this won't hurt. She is at least a real person with a bit of fire in her belly. Starmer is a weird mix of polished and whiney. She may yet 'snatch' it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 09 May 22 5.10pm | |
---|---|
Starmer putting his head in the noose before he is sentenced. He is guilty as hell and he knows it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HeathMan Purley 10 May 22 8.45pm | |
---|---|
I am thinking of a lady - Lesley Garrett a soprano singer - who once demonstrated that a lady's legs are interesting. She sat down and indicated that she wanted to be sure that she had not displayed herself. She patted herself and her smile effectively said "oh good, I remembered to wear my knickers". We have to live with (not show too much attention) ladies who wish to appear interesting. It is hard, but someone has to do it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 10 May 22 11.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Starmer putting his head in the noose before he is sentenced. He is guilty as hell and he knows it. So Boris going from party to party at a point in time where he set rules keeping people from seeing dying loved ones, or well anyone, is a nothing nonsense we should move on from, but when Starmer 'may' have had a works (or post work) meal he's 'guilty as hell' and should go? I'm all for Starmer quitting if fined, if thats viewed as the point he should, but clearly if he does it's reasonable to assume that Boris should to. There is no rational take that somehow makes Boris' behaviour more acceptable. If you set such incredibly restrictive rules, you follow the rules. Edited by BlueJay (10 May 2022 11.46pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 11 May 22 10.46am | |
---|---|
Starmer can do as he wants, he is playing a cynical game in his choice of words as he expects the Durham police will not break precedent and issue a fine. I pray that Rayner become LOTO.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.