You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > The women's world cup
November 24 2024 8.40pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The women's world cup

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 11 of 11 << First< 7 8 9 10 11

  

chris123 Flag hove actually 07 Jul 19 5.11pm Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Originally posted by palace_in_frogland

Jonathan Pearce has got a lot to answer for as well; his commentating lends the whole thing a certain gravitas. They should have chosen a team of those squeaky birds who are trying to infiltrate the men’s game.

Listen on the radio then, grim.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Invalid user 2019 Flag 07 Jul 19 5.52pm

It looks like we gave the US more of a run for their money than another one else.. Well done yanks.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Jul 19 11.14am Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Asking for equal pay now. I suggest equal standard = equal pay. A few years away yet. I enjoyed watching the English ladies as I could support them but, overall, standard was poor.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Bexley Eagle Flag Bexley Kent 08 Jul 19 4.28pm Send a Private Message to Bexley Eagle Add Bexley Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Asking for equal pay now. I suggest equal standard = equal pay. A few years away yet. I enjoyed watching the English ladies as I could support them but, overall, standard was poor.

I would say the standard equates to a decent non league side. Not sure how much they get paid but I suspect it will be a pay cut for some.
I saw a bit of the women's ashes cricket yesterday. England managed to get bowled out by some 70 MPH swinging dobbers. For those that remember a bit like the gentle stuff Gooch used to bowl. If that was served up in the men's game it would go the distance for sure. There is a massive gulf in the standards required for men's and women's sport so there is quite rightly a massive disparity in what they are paid.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 08 Jul 19 4.31pm Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Bexley Eagle

I would say the standard equates to a decent non league side. Not sure how much they get paid but I suspect it will be a pay cut for some.
I saw a bit of the women's ashes cricket yesterday. England managed to get bowled out by some 70 MPH swinging dobbers. For those that remember a bit like the gentle stuff Gooch used to bowl. If that was served up in the men's game it would go the distance for sure. There is a massive gulf in the standards required for men's and women's sport so there is quite rightly a massive disparity in what they are paid.


Actually ability should have nothing to do with it. Professional sport is entertainment players should be rewarded based on income for that sport. It doens't matter if women's cricket is terrible what matters is does anyone want to pay to watch it. If they do then the players should be rewarded accordingly. Equality in sport is a misnomer.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Invalid user 2019 Flag 09 Jul 19 1.40pm

Originally posted by Badger11

Actually ability should have nothing to do with it. Professional sport is entertainment players should be rewarded based on income for that sport. It doens't matter if women's cricket is terrible what matters is does anyone want to pay to watch it. If they do then the players should be rewarded accordingly. Equality in sport is a misnomer.

This sounds about right to me. Women's tennis is commercially popular and they get paid well. Women's darts on the other hand, nobody gives a monkeys toss about and so isn't.

I'm all for a bit of money being put in at grass roots to improve standards, but I don't see women's football shifting significantly from the current position which of relatively popular at national level and disinterest at club level.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
MKCPFC Flag Spain/MK 12 Jul 19 8.52am Send a Private Message to MKCPFC Add MKCPFC as a friend

Women's tennis just fills the gaps between the Men's game.

How they get paid the same as men for doing half the work is unbelievable.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 12 Jul 19 9.09am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by dollardays

This sounds about right to me. Women's tennis is commercially popular and they get paid well. Women's darts on the other hand, nobody gives a monkeys toss about and so isn't.

I'm all for a bit of money being put in at grass roots to improve standards, but I don't see women's football shifting significantly from the current position which of relatively popular at national level and disinterest at club level.


After the last Women's world cup attendances in this country went up briefly then went down. They have a lot of work to do before the hype matches the reality.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
PhuketEagle Flag Phuket 12 Jul 19 11.04am Send a Private Message to PhuketEagle Add PhuketEagle as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

After the last Women's world cup attendances in this country went up briefly then went down. They have a lot of work to do before the hype matches the reality.

Watching that Rapinoe woman, the good ol' US of A certainly knows how to hype things up. They haven't stopped shouting about it since touching down. Hopefully their heads'll explode soon. Humility isn't in their make-up.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
YT Flag Oxford 12 Jul 19 11.57am Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by MKCPFC

Women's tennis just fills the gaps between the Men's game.

How they get paid the same as men for doing half the work is unbelievable.

If you are referring to the major tournaments, the women do between three-fifths and two-thirds of the work, as you put it; so that's more than half. In regular tournaments they do the same amount of work.

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 12 Jul 19 1.26pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by YT

If you are referring to the major tournaments, the women do between three-fifths and two-thirds of the work, as you put it; so that's more than half. In regular tournaments they do the same amount of work.

And they look better - so it's a yes from me.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
YT Flag Oxford 13 Jul 19 9.46am Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by ASCPFC

And they look better - so it's a yes from me.

Hell yeah. There's something about a little white tennis dress and tennis shoes

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 11 of 11 << First< 7 8 9 10 11

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > The women's world cup