They need money.
In their hour of need they state they are a voice for the voiceless!! I guess that's only if your left wing. Are you a voice for the proud English?

From the guardian

"Since you’re here…

… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.

The Guardian is editorially independent, meaning we set our own agenda. Our journalism is free from commercial bias and not influenced by billionaire owners, politicians or shareholders. No one edits our Editor. No one steers our opinion. This is important because it enables us to give a voice to the voiceless, challenge the powerful and hold them to account. It’s what makes us different to so many others in the media, at a time when factual, honest reporting is critical.

If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure. You can support the Guardian with a monthly contribution of £5, £10 or £20 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.

Support The Guardian

Is that any different to The Times who require a subscription before allowing you to read their online version

He literally says in his second and third sentences and yet still you ask that question.

Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Aug 2018 4.44am)

He does not literally say that - he only infers it.

I’m asking what the constructive point is?