I’m struggling to understand what point the OP is trying to make or indeed why he thinks anyone cares.

Presumably the ‘no touch’ law is aimed at stopping ‘dance’ venues becoming ‘sex’ venues; in which case it (the law) would seem perfectly reasonable. And it wouldn’t surprise me if a judge has ruled that the law is unenforceable against family members.

It’s quite fashionable to be anti-USA these days, but this post seems to be scraping the barrel.