You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Why don't we sign young prospects?
November 22 2024 11.59am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Why don't we sign young prospects?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 3 << First< 1 2 3

  

Eaglecoops Flag CR3 21 Jan 18 11.12am Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

TFM and RLC might well have come initially because they liked the look of FDB's style, however both of them have celebrated Roy's approach to management in one form or another since his arrival and there has not been one piece of criticism that I am aware of coming out the training ground about his style of play.

Moving back to the OPs point, it can be difficult for teams like Palace to take the risk on youngsters because if they don't work out then firstly it will be a waste of money and secondly it could impact on our league position with us then having limited resources to fall back on. Most teams of the Palace ilk do tend to go for safe pairs of hands and as someone has already said a Jimmy Mc despite being less technically gifted is a better prospect for us than someone like Campana. Roy is, quite predictably, old school in his approach and is not known for piling loads of youngsters into a team. I don't have an issue with that however I would like to see our academy improved and for players to be filtered gently into the team. Kaikai hasn't cut the mustard at this level as of yet and may never, but I am sure there are a couple of the youngsters who are knocking at the door such as Lokilo.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Booted Eagle Flag Bristol 21 Jan 18 11.13am Send a Private Message to Booted Eagle Add Booted Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by hellzdoms

Money is tight currently by the looks of things. But apart from making crucial signings like a new goalkeeper and a solid CB, i feel the club ought to look into young prospects. A young striker or a midfielder would add further depth, couple of months/years of training maybe he can become 1st team striker.

You never know we might stumble across a wonder kid that will one day be as crucial as Zaha,

Money isn't tight, it is what you get for it which is. The market has been blown out of the water because of the huge fees at the top. Now every Cleverly, Chaplow, and Arter is up for a king's ransom. As others have said the academy should be at a level where the top prospect/s are close to at least being given a chance. Clearly it is not there yet. Otherwise we need to get players who can and also ready to play this Jan. If we can get 3 of these, one who is comparable to Luka last season think we will be fine until the end of the season.

 


“ [T]here are known knowns; there are things we know that we know.There are known unknowns; that is to say there are things that, we now know we don't know.But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don't know. ”
—United States Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TheExpatEagle Flag 21 Jan 18 2.23pm Send a Private Message to TheExpatEagle Add TheExpatEagle as a friend

Originally posted by hellzdoms

I should've been more clearer. Yes 1 signing. I meant in general solid players were brought in. Plus we were linked with potential players. I think it is the same with Roy, there is no way he can do much with what we've got. As much as people were shocked that he said we need to sign 6-7 players this window. It was not far from the truth.

I completely agree with Roy and even RdB needed as many players. Most of us can reel off 8-10 who simply are not good enough for a lower end club like us.

It's interesting that no matter how many injuries we have Jordan Mutch isn't on the bench.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TheExpatEagle Flag 21 Jan 18 2.25pm Send a Private Message to TheExpatEagle Add TheExpatEagle as a friend

Originally posted by hellzdoms

I guess depends how much he is needed by chelsea. RLC proved himself to be a first team player. Which like you said, would raise the price on his head. That is not to say that there isn't any other midfielders or youngsters with potential that we can sign.

On one of the podcasts I listen to (Totally Football Show) they said Chelsea didn't submit a 25 man squad in September because they didn't have their quota of home grown players.

They just signed Barkley and that is said to be why they want Carrol or Crouch. Given that English talent is hard to find I guess they'll want to keep RLC next season.

Disclaimer: You do not need to be English to be home grown but you see my point?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TheExpatEagle Flag 21 Jan 18 2.26pm Send a Private Message to TheExpatEagle Add TheExpatEagle as a friend

Originally posted by hellzdoms

It's all about a return at the end of the day. I rather sign 10 young prospects for couple of mil, and straight away loan them out if they are not 100% ready to be part of the first team. It would bring some money in at least. Look at Williams, I don't recall he ever played for Palace. Always is loaned out to some Championship side.

If we can't produce the youngsters. Let's buy them.

I agree.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TheExpatEagle Flag 21 Jan 18 2.27pm Send a Private Message to TheExpatEagle Add TheExpatEagle as a friend

Originally posted by bexleydave

Two of which would have been in the Championship.

Maybe so but to overhaul the team it takes time.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Palace in the Blood Flag 21 Jan 18 4.27pm Send a Private Message to Palace in the Blood Add Palace in the Blood as a friend

Originally posted by TheExpatEagle

FdB made 1 signing. Not a criticism of him, he wasn't given the funds to be a success. I said at the time he'd need 3 good windows to build a team he needed.

None of us were around the corridors of power when decisions were made so we don't know the truth. However from a throwaway comment that was made in the press I remember reading I think that this is not true. The comment was effectively that names were put forward to FDB and he didn't like them. We know that a number of ex Ajax players were approached and that some offers made. At least two took alternative offers so I question Why? as in all probability it was not the wages on offer.

I think FDB was given a budget of £50 million he bought Riederweld and failed with his other bids. Our start was lets face it not good. I think the board wanted Sakho and he didn't (same as Pulis and Zaha?).

In the last week of the transfer window a director of football was brought in.I think that that SP and board already knew FDB was wrong man.

I think FDB had been given the veto uptil then but in those final days SP took over. I think he insisted on Sakho and Niasse unfortunately the latter did not materialise.

I may be very wrong but suspect FDB was the cause of our lack of transfers.

This thread was about young prospects and clearly we should be bringing young players in. Reiderweld is not a good example as he was not cheap and I am not sure yet he is EPL standard. He lacks physicality and stature of a Central defender but may make a good midfielder. The young Swedish player we seem to be getting on loan was the papers stated, offered a Palace contract but however decided on Benfica who immediately offered him for loan. The Polish Central defender we may have bought is young. We have looked at some young keepers.Nick Powell from Wigan has been mentioned.

So I think we are looking at some youngsters who may be there

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
HeathMan Flag Purley 21 Jan 18 4.46pm Send a Private Message to HeathMan Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add HeathMan as a friend

Looking at our goalkeeping area helps me to understand the concept of age. We have an older and a younger goalkeeper who, in combination, slow the progress of any junior (GK) players we may have. We need to put out a team at least forty times a season and need a core of players in their twenties. You expect to keep a 21yo player for three years and a 25yo for four years. Longer stays can be a bonus as far as supporters are concerned and a did-incentive to those wanting to move (within the club) to the first team. We have exported two young players - to League two teams - this window. Hopefully those left will come through - but we may sign some finished products to make up the numbers before they do.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 3 << First< 1 2 3

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Why don't we sign young prospects?