This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stuk Top half 18 Jan 18 2.49pm | |
---|---|
I didn't think it was a penalty at the time, and I didn't after any of the replays either. A studio full of strikers was hardly impartial input either. Only bad thing is that Chelsea now have 2 players banned, and they've got Brighton on Saturday.
Optimistic as ever |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sxp55 South Norwood 18 Jan 18 2.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by topcat
I think misconduct although Henry got away with it against Ireland so I can't see anything happening unless there is (or has been) a rule change. yeah this was what i was wondering about. he's cheated, thought this would be a ban of some sort.
@sxp55555 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kenbarr Jackson Heights, Queens, New York ... 18 Jan 18 3.00pm | |
---|---|
I figured Sweet Fanny Adams would produce an almooty cick up (don't you love Constable Crabtree) & they came through again. I don't know who has the worst replay system, MLB, NFL, NBA, NHL or FA?
Divorced...And LOVING it! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 18 Jan 18 4.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DutchEagleJohan
I think the tackle is not on his leg but well ahead of it. Then he trails his leg to make the contact. We need to get away from the idea that: going down looking for it is acceptable. I get rather angry when commentators say: there was contact, yes and..... since when is contact synonym for fouling? Indeed. There is contact all over the pitch but not every contact is a foul.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
kenbarr Jackson Heights, Queens, New York ... 28 Jan 18 2.32am | |
---|---|
Divorced...And LOVING it! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Pierre Purley 28 Jan 18 3.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by kenbarr
Football VAR needs to look at Rugby where the referee refers decisions he wants clarifying to a video referee. They look at footage from different cameras and angles and makes decision for the referee on the field. Also the FA must act to stop players surrounding, harassing and pressurising officials in order to try and influence or overturn decisions.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DutchEagleJohan Vlissingen, Netherlands 29 Jan 18 6.15pm | |
---|---|
Wise words. It needs some time and evolution. The fact that it on occasions disrupts the flow of the game does not mean VAR in itself is the problem. Many things disrupts the flow of the game, excessive fouling (Huddersfield or Bournemouth at home), feigning Injury, time wasting. Yet we all accept that this is part of the game. Of course 3 mins is way too long, but VAR needs to be used more intensively not disregarded as useless. Originally posted by Pierre
Football VAR needs to look at Rugby where the referee refers decisions he wants clarifying to a video referee. They look at footage from different cameras and angles and makes decision for the referee on the field. Also the FA must act to stop players surrounding, harassing and pressurising officials in order to try and influence or overturn decisions.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.