This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 27 Jul 17 10.47am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
No,predictable in that he has a boring and silly pop at you,even when he actually agrees with you on the issue in question Yawn!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 27 Jul 17 10.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
A flaming disaster. Opens the floodgates for ambulance chasing lawyers. Do you have any idea how many Tribunals there used to be before the fee? 200,000. No other country I have worked in had even a tenth of the volume. If you have a good case you get your fee money back anyway. Edited by Mapletree (26 Jul 2017 11.10pm) But you don't go into a tribunal knowing that you will win. The fact that you could end up out of pocket would be enough to stop some people pursuing a claim.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 27 Jul 17 1.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
A flaming disaster. Opens the floodgates for ambulance chasing lawyers. Do you have any idea how many Tribunals there used to be before the fee? 200,000. No other country I have worked in had even a tenth of the volume. If you have a good case you get your fee money back anyway. Edited by Mapletree (26 Jul 2017 11.10pm) If I remember rightly, the costs awards for tribunal are quite small.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 27 Jul 17 3.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
If I remember rightly, the costs awards for tribunal are quite small. Where do you remember that from Jamie. As an employer I have had quite large costs awarded to me for vexatious claims.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 27 Jul 17 3.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
But you don't go into a tribunal knowing that you will win. The fact that you could end up out of pocket would be enough to stop some people pursuing a claim. You got any idea how much it costs the Courts to process 200,000 claims. And employers to defend them. Back when claims were at that level almost all were Mickey Mouse. These days there is always an angle to blackmail a perfectly innocent employer, there are multiple protected categories. For example I can be accused of discriminating against you because you are young (unlikely in your case). Almost all discrimination elements were found to be without merit. That madness had gone, looks like it is coming back. The lawyers and barking mad fight-their-own-shadow people get their days in Court again. And I say days, even daft claims take three or four.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 27 Jul 17 3.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Where do you remember that from Jamie. As an employer I have had quite large costs awarded to me for vexatious claims. My 101 Introduction to Law. Employment Tribunals don't generally have costs awarded to the respondent.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 27 Jul 17 4.16pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
You got any idea how much it costs the Courts to process 200,000 claims. And employers to defend them. Back when claims were at that level almost all were Mickey Mouse. These days there is always an angle to blackmail a perfectly innocent employer, there are multiple protected categories. For example I can be accused of discriminating against you because you are young (unlikely in your case). Almost all discrimination elements were found to be without merit. That madness had gone, looks like it is coming back. The lawyers and barking mad fight-their-own-shadow people get their days in Court again. And I say days, even daft claims take three or four. I understand your problem. We have created a society where people can cry foul for virtually anything and that was foolish. Even so, the charge was unfair and what is perhaps required is a review of what can be taken to tribunal and what should be dealt with at a less formal and expensive level of arbitration.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.