Buy Back Clause

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Buy Back Clause

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 7 of 7 << First < 3 4 5 6 7

Dan89 Se25 28 Jul 17 9.23am
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle I bet that you're one of these people that publically insult our players then claim that Palace have the best fans in the Premiership I bet your one them of them people that don't understand jokes and real fun at parties. Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football
Alert a moderator to this post

Dan89

Se25 28 Jul 17 9.23am

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

I bet that you're one of these people that publically insult our players then claim that Palace have the best fans in the Premiership

I bet your one them of them people that don't understand jokes and real fun at parties.

Another Damien Diagonal - Total Football

Alert a moderator to this post

Pierre Purley 30 Jul 17 3.11pm
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle I bet that you're one of these people that publically insult our players then claim that Palace have the best fans in the Premiership Well, we do have the best fans in the Premiership at Palace but I'm the Catering manager at the moment and that just comment about Mutch just isn't funny!
Alert a moderator to this post

Pierre

Purley 30 Jul 17 3.11pm

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

I bet that you're one of these people that publically insult our players then claim that Palace have the best fans in the Premiership

Well, we do have the best fans in the Premiership at Palace but I'm the Catering manager at the moment and that just comment about Mutch just isn't funny!

Alert a moderator to this post

CPFC/SCCC Sutton 31 Jul 17 11.23am
Buyback clause always favour the big sides. Andy Johnson Magic, He wears a Magic Hat When he Sees the match ball, he says he having that He scores one with left foot, he scores one with his right And When his playing Brighton, He scores all f***ING Night!
Alert a moderator to this post

CPFC/SCCC

Sutton 31 Jul 17 11.23am

Buyback clause always favour the big sides.

Andy Johnson Magic, He wears a Magic Hat
When he Sees the match ball, he says he having that
He scores one with left foot, he scores one with his right
And When his playing Brighton, He scores all f***ING Night!

Alert a moderator to this post

Goldfiinger Just down the road 31 Jul 17 11.50am
Originally posted by Dan89 Is there much different in high sell on clauses. I think with the sell on clause that p'boro had we actually didn't make a profit on Dwight Gayle sale to Newcastle. It's a tricky one I'll hold my hands up an apologise for my early ranting at buy back clauses I've been mulling things over the last few days. It maybe not that they should be banned, but some form of monitoring maybe wise? Like is it fair the buying club can buy them back and sell them straight on at a profit. You know it's one thing to buy them back to play them it's another to buy them back and flip them for a return. Does the player get a choice in this? What if he's settled and doesn't want the move? Should there be limits on how many players per team / league can be sold / bought from the same club. I think I'm starting to see there are positives but also think the structure should be overseen for fairness to all.
Alert a moderator to this post

Goldfiinger

Just down the road 31 Jul 17 11.50am

Originally posted by Dan89

Is there much different in high sell on clauses. I think with the sell on clause that p'boro had we actually didn't make a profit on Dwight Gayle sale to Newcastle.

It's a tricky one I'll hold my hands up an apologise for my early ranting at buy back clauses I've been mulling things over the last few days.

It maybe not that they should be banned, but some form of monitoring maybe wise?

Like is it fair the buying club can buy them back and sell them straight on at a profit. You know it's one thing to buy them back to play them it's another to buy them back and flip them for a return.

Does the player get a choice in this? What if he's settled and doesn't want the move?

Should there be limits on how many players per team / league can be sold / bought from the same club.

I think I'm starting to see there are positives but also think the structure should be overseen for fairness to all.

Alert a moderator to this post

Ginger Pubic Wig Wickham de L'Ouest 02 Jan 18 4.30pm
bump. who'd want us to purchase TFM and RLC in this window if their clubs insisted on a buy back clause? let's say 15m each with a 25m buy back each? If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities.
Alert a moderator to this post

Ginger Pubic Wig

Wickham de L'Ouest 02 Jan 18 4.30pm

Send a Private Message to Ginger Pubic Wig

bump.

who'd want us to purchase TFM and RLC in this window if their clubs insisted on a buy back clause?

let's say 15m each with a 25m buy back each?

If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities.

Alert a moderator to this post

HeathMan Purley 02 Jan 18 4.44pm
The £10m each would be a reward for their improvements while at Palace. Would give anywhere between £12m and £16m for purchase without buyback. Attractions for selling clubs would include off payroll and another player not sat getting cold (and losing football skills and getting more frustrated by lack of game time. The sad thing is that Chelsea will loan players out from reaching age 18 to reaching 35. COYP
Alert a moderator to this post

HeathMan

Purley 02 Jan 18 4.44pm

The £10m each would be a reward for their improvements while at Palace. Would give anywhere between £12m and £16m for purchase without buyback. Attractions for selling clubs would include off payroll and another player not sat getting cold (and losing football skills and getting more frustrated by lack of game time. The sad thing is that Chelsea will loan players out from reaching age 18 to reaching 35. COYP

Alert a moderator to this post

Ray in Houston Houston 02 Jan 18 5.04pm
Originally posted by Ginger Pubic Wig bump. who'd want us to purchase TFM and RLC in this window if their clubs insisted on a buy back clause? let's say 15m each with a 25m buy back each? I'd be reluctant to take any player on a BBC. The best I'd agree to is a percentage of the profit from the sale, or an option to match the purchase price offered. A BBC is complete bulls* and should be banned under UEFA/FIFA rules. We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just waing with a football.
Alert a moderator to this post

Ray in Houston

Houston 02 Jan 18 5.04pm

Send a Private Message to Ray in Houston

Originally posted by Ginger Pubic Wig

bump.

who'd want us to purchase TFM and RLC in this window if their clubs insisted on a buy back clause?

let's say 15m each with a 25m buy back each?

I'd be reluctant to take any player on a BBC. The best I'd agree to is a percentage of the profit from the sale, or an option to match the purchase price offered.

A BBC is complete bulls*** and should be banned under UEFA/FIFA rules.

We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert a moderator to this post

Ginger Pubic Wig Wickham de L'Ouest 02 Jan 18 7.06pm
I always think loans are worse though. especially for players. If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities.
Alert a moderator to this post

Ginger Pubic Wig

Wickham de L'Ouest 02 Jan 18 7.06pm

I always think loans are worse though. especially for players.

If you want to live in a world full of kindness, respect and love, try to show these qualities.

Alert a moderator to this post

Ray in Houston Houston 02 Jan 18 10.22pm
Originally posted by Ginger Pubic Wig I always think loans are worse though. especially for players. The loan system allows rich clubs to abuse players and poor(er) clubs. If they were serious about FFP, they would limit the number of players a team can have out on loan; that would stop big clubs from stockpiling talent and using the loan system to get them playing time. This would also be a boon to the lower leagues, who get shut out from owning - and therefore profiting from - young talent. Instead, they can get it only by paying away loan fees to the rich clubs, which is just a tax on the poor. We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.
Alert a moderator to this post

Ray in Houston

Houston 02 Jan 18 10.22pm

Originally posted by Ginger Pubic Wig

I always think loans are worse though. especially for players.

The loan system allows rich clubs to abuse players and poor(er) clubs. If they were serious about FFP, they would limit the number of players a team can have out on loan; that would stop big clubs from stockpiling talent and using the loan system to get them playing time.

This would also be a boon to the lower leagues, who get shut out from owning - and therefore profiting from - young talent. Instead, they can get it only by paying away loan fees to the rich clubs, which is just a tax on the poor.

We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 7 of 7 << First < 3 4 5 6 7

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Buy Back Clause

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors