You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Why we need two strikers
November 23 2024 4.53am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Why we need two strikers

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 3 << First< 1 2 3

  

nairb75 Flag Baltimore 01 Aug 16 1.35pm Send a Private Message to nairb75 Add nairb75 as a friend

Originally posted by CPFC/SCCC

We could have great strikers, the fact we don't create many chances is more of a worry. I personally think playing 2 midfielders would be a mistake as we would get over run in midfield. I think cabaye is to slow to play in a 2 man midfield.

look at the stats - plenty of balls coming in. no striker to either create opportunities or finish.

how many games did FC play in the winter? i'd bet you're almost more likely to score than him.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
.TUX. Flag 01 Aug 16 2.41pm

Originally posted by CPFC/SCCC

We could have great strikers, the fact we don't create many chances is more of a worry. I personally think playing 2 midfielders would be a mistake as we would get over run in midfield. I think cabaye is to slow to play in a 2 man midfield.

Average shots on goal/on target per game last season:

1st Spurs 17.3/6.6
9th Palace 12.3/4
20th Villa 10/WBA 2.8

That puts Palace 9th/10th in the 'shots per game' stats table. Surprisingly good considering our lack of a regular/prolific striker.
Though it can always be improved, 'Creating many chances' isn't the issue.

 


Buy Litecoin.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
DivingIsNotGood Flag se25 01 Aug 16 7.20pm

Playing Caybye so deep is a waste IMO. He is a great attacking mid and only think he plays deeper now becuase of his age.
Been saying for last 2 seasons we should play two strikers yet Pardew thinks he knows better than me ffs

 


VOTING OUT - Brexit will allow Britain to embrace the Commonwealth and be GREAT again

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
DivingIsNotGood Flag se25 01 Aug 16 7.21pm

Originally posted by .TUX.

Average shots on goal/on target per game last season:

1st Spurs 17.3/6.6
9th Palace 12.3/4
20th Villa 10/WBA 2.8

That puts Palace 9th/10th in the 'shots per game' stats table. Surprisingly good considering our lack of a regular/prolific striker.
Though it can always be improved, 'Creating many chances' isn't the issue.


Alot of that is set play, not from open play though

 


VOTING OUT - Brexit will allow Britain to embrace the Commonwealth and be GREAT again

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
james03 Flag Bangkok 02 Aug 16 8.51am Send a Private Message to james03 Add james03 as a friend

It is not so much about the quality of crosses in to the box nor is it about Wickham's movement be it good or bad. The simple fact as I see is that we do not get anywhere near enough bodies in the box.

Along with Wickham, Puncheon and the wide man who does not have the ball should always be in or getting in to the box and either Cabaye or McArthur looking to do the same.

The idea then is for the wide man to get the ball in the box, it does not always need to be done with pinpoint accuracy if we have three plus players there waiting for the cross.

 


The secret of life is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake that, you've got it made. Groucho Marx

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 3 of 3 << First< 1 2 3

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > Why we need two strikers