You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > No January incoming transfers?
November 23 2024 8.29am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

No January incoming transfers?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 2 << First< 1 2

  

leejaneagles Flag 13 Dec 15 12.25am Send a Private Message to leejaneagles Add leejaneagles as a friend

Quote ceitinn at 12 Dec 2015 11.14pm

Given the performances of Wickham in the last 3 games isn't the role of the lone striker more about other things than scoring goals?

Of course a few goals would always be nice but it would be a bit harsh to replace him.

I think in the next 5 games we could be looking at a different situation, Wickham getting 2 goals in the next 5 would change the complexion a little.

He's been out injured a while and is just getting in his stride. And this is from someone who didn't want to sign him as I thought he was substandard.

Wickham and WH's performances recently have changed my mind.


Was listening to Rock and Roll football with Wrighty on the way home from the game and he was talking about no striker scoring for Palace. He said even if they're not prolific, getting just 10 goals this season from one of our strikers would probably mean a place or 2 higher in the league - Which right now would be Champions League!!!

Troy Deeney is a good example of a striker that focusses on mainly bringing others into play but also pops up with a goal or two. Frustratingly enough, Glenn Murray would have done this for us. Even in a limited role this season, I reckon Glenn would have 4 goals at this stage for Palace.

Obviously we just turned over a good team in Southampton and now everyone is saying Wickham doesn't need to score because he was strong and linked play well. But how many times do you see a team "turn over" another and yet the final result is still 1-0?

We should have won by 2 and what's more concerning is if it wasn't for a superb save from Hennessey in the last minute we'd all be so frustrated now and cursing 2 stolen points.

Again what's worrying is our goal wasn't a "normal" goal. It was good awareness from Bolasie and some magic from Cabaye to be in that position (Pard's said himself he shouldn't have been there). That could of very easily been a huff and puff game that we dominate and yet finishes 0-0.

So in short (sorry for rambling), we do still need our striker to contribute at least some goals this season.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
taylors lovechild Flag 13 Dec 15 8.27pm Send a Private Message to taylors lovechild Add taylors lovechild as a friend

Wickham is unlucky to still be without a goal. I was a skeptic, but he is looking really good.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
rob1969 Flag Banstead Surrey 13 Dec 15 9.26pm Send a Private Message to rob1969 Add rob1969 as a friend

I feel sure CW will shortly score and - together with YB and our mid field - produce enough to see us safely home this season. Main concern is if CW gets injured we could be back where we were prior to his recent return. I think any major additions will wait till Summer.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ambrose7 Flag Croydon 14 Dec 15 9.33am Send a Private Message to ambrose7 Add ambrose7 as a friend

I'm sure Murray would have 4 by now, but he wouldn't have had a 2 month injury. Wickham's hardly on a huge drought, he's only played 5 or 6 games and has, off the top of my head, hit the post against Arsenal, forced two good saves against Southampton, a very good save against Everton, got 3 assists against Newcastle and was very impressive at Chelsea. He could easily be on 3 now with a little luck and from not many games that'd be good.

If he's creating chances for others, I don't care who gets the final touch. When the presence up front stops creating chances, then I'll be concerned.

 


26th January 2010 - Enter Administration
2nd May 2010 - D-Day 1 - Survival at Hillsborough
1st June 2010 - D-Day 2 - Survival at Lloyds
7th June 2010 - CPFC2010 exchange contracts.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
DANGERCLOSE Flag London 14 Dec 15 9.34am Send a Private Message to DANGERCLOSE Add DANGERCLOSE as a friend

Quote ceitinn at 12 Dec 2015 11.14pm

Given the performances of Wickham in the last 3 games isn't the role of the lone striker more about other things than scoring goals?

Of course a few goals would always be nice but it would be a bit harsh to replace him.

I think in the next 5 games we could be looking at a different situation, Wickham getting 2 goals in the next 5 would change the complexion a little.

He's been out injured a while and is just getting in his stride. And this is from someone who didn't want to sign him as I thought he was substandard.

Wickham and WH's performances recently have changed my mind.

Agreed


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Lyons550 Flag Shirley 14 Dec 15 2.28pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Quote miles18 at 12 Dec 2015 1.08pm

No we can't. We need a striker who can score.

Jaysus...change the f***ing record will ya!


 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
staggian Flag Weybridge 15 Dec 15 1.26pm Send a Private Message to staggian Add staggian as a friend

Connor Wickham seems to be in a similar predicament to Benteke at Liverpool where they are utilised more for build up play and offering a physical presence to aim for against opposition defenders.

Of the two I would say Wickham is the far more effective at it. Against Southampton he had perhaps one clear cut opportunity from a peach of a ball from Cabaye and was only denied by a great save.

He does a good job of tiring central defenders as he doesnt just stay central, so it would be good to see if bringing Gayle on in the dying minutes of the game to use his pace would provide some late goals.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
alaneagle1 Flag Dunstable,Bedfordshire.England 15 Dec 15 1.40pm Send a Private Message to alaneagle1 Add alaneagle1 as a friend

Quote matthau at 12 Dec 2015 10.18pm

when pardew said 'we don't have to get that involved' ....that tells me no superstar striker worth 5 mill plus will be chased.

obviously I know fa. but I hope it's simply a smokescreen.

maybe even a young foreign CB from France or Italy too eh.

oooh motd on in 3 mins.

Or give Martin Kelly a chance.

 


Palace 13th 2017/18.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 2 of 2 << First< 1 2

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Transfer Talk > No January incoming transfers?