This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
jamiemartin721 Reading 22 Jan 14 4.36pm | |
---|---|
Quote Joeberto at 21 Jan 2014 10.23pm
Quote thebob at 21 Jan 2014 10.05pm
Why does everyone keep looking at players and not at a team? You can collect the best players in the country, put them in a team and end up with mediocrity. Look at the England team as an example. Wilbs may not be the greatest striker, but that does not mean that he can't be a member of a great strike force. He plays a part, and the parts add up to more than they would individually. No offence, I like the guy and think in the absence of any better options he can do a job of sorts. But I think Wilbs would be prevented from being a "member of a great strike force" by the lack of his ability to strike. Aye, he couldn't strike in a union.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
shivie East Sussex 22 Jan 14 4.46pm | |
---|---|
I know January is a month where people get depressed but I didn't realise you also lost your marbles Wilbraham is just not good enough for Prem or Championship move on
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hambo Crawley 22 Jan 14 4.57pm | |
---|---|
I understand the point but it only considers the attacking impact on the system and not the defensive. In my opinion Jerome already does lead the line really well, but without being a serious goal threat. Wilbraham does the same and is less of a goal threat. What we need up front is someone who can lead the line and convert more chances than Jerome. Not sure Gayle will have the physical presence and workrate to do so - so bringing someone in seems the bestoption - which is easier said than done perhaps.
HOL Radio Lead Presenter and sampler of processed meats HOL radio - Sunday nights [Link] [Tweet Link] My Twitter: [Tweet Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
southport_eagle Southport 22 Jan 14 5.06pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hambo at 22 Jan 2014 4.57pm
I understand the point but it only considers the attacking impact on the system and not the defensive. In my opinion Jerome already does lead the line really well, but without being a serious goal threat. Wilbraham does the same and is less of a goal threat. What we need up front is someone who can lead the line and convert more chances than Jerome. Not sure Gayle will have the physical presence and workrate to do so - so bringing someone in seems the bestoption - which is easier said than done perhaps. I am all in favour of getting a great new striker in. I am also keen to get Murray back in firing in the goals like last season. I do like the Jerome/Chamakh combination even though it is a bit light on goals. I am only suggesting the Gayle/Wilbraham combination as another alternative with the players that we have. We will get injuries and suspensions and also need other options late in games.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hambo Crawley 22 Jan 14 5.32pm | |
---|---|
Quote southport_eagle at 22 Jan 2014 5.06pm
Quote Hambo at 22 Jan 2014 4.57pm
I understand the point but it only considers the attacking impact on the system and not the defensive. In my opinion Jerome already does lead the line really well, but without being a serious goal threat. Wilbraham does the same and is less of a goal threat. What we need up front is someone who can lead the line and convert more chances than Jerome. Not sure Gayle will have the physical presence and workrate to do so - so bringing someone in seems the bestoption - which is easier said than done perhaps. I am all in favour of getting a great new striker in. I am also keen to get Murray back in firing in the goals like last season. I do like the Jerome/Chamakh combination even though it is a bit light on goals. I am only suggesting the Gayle/Wilbraham combination as another alternative with the players that we have. We will get injuries and suspensions and also need other options late in games.
I guess what I am saying is although I would be interested to see what you suggest, as I would a couple of other combinations, I don't see it happening because I beleive the system we use will prevent it.
HOL Radio Lead Presenter and sampler of processed meats HOL radio - Sunday nights [Link] [Tweet Link] My Twitter: [Tweet Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
blind eagle Covington.Tennessee 24 Jan 14 9.39pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 21 Jan 2014 11.56am
Wilbs isn't good enough to be a primary player in a game, I like him, and he does a great job as a five or ten minute back up man to protect a lead and a more valued player. But starting with him ahead of either Jerome or Chamakh would be insane.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
zappata 24 Jan 14 10.58pm | |
---|---|
Wilbraham is terrible.Why some palace fans seem to grow fond of mediocre triers is beyond me. Gayle on the other hand has bags of potential,but he just isn't the sort of striker TP will start in this current system.Shame.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
southport_eagle Southport 26 Jan 14 3.50pm | |
---|---|
This combination worked pretty well at toke yesterday. I was expecting Wilbs to flick on to Gayle but it was the other way around for the goal yesterday. Gayle always looked dangerous running on to Wilbrahams flick-ons yesterday, Wilbraham being further forward than Chamakh had been also gave room to Puncheon and Bannan to come inside.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
oghash 26 Jan 14 4.10pm | |
---|---|
Chamakh and a fit Murray would be an awesome pairing. Murray showed last season he can hold the ball up when needed and score. He also showed how deadly he is with good service so with Chamakh feeding him along with YB and JW he could be our Lambert.
Why would anyone chose to be a Seagull? The Eagle is a far superior creature. The Seagull lives under it's damp pier meekly looking out, blinded by the sheer quality of the Eagle's palace. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 26 Jan 14 7.28pm | |
---|---|
Quote shivie at 22 Jan 2014 4.46pm
Wilbraham is just not good enough for Prem or Championship move on If we keep both of them in the 25, I'll bet you Wilbs contributes more than Gayle in our remaining games.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.