I agree with this [Link] that Spurs need a striker more than they need Eze and I think that's where their money will go. Levy might try a cheeky lowball offer, but any serious money will probably go on someone like Toney or Solanke. Were they to sell Richarlison that might change, but I still think Eze will be with us at least for one more season.

Rubbish. If a Hugely succesful club like City made their intentions known that they want him and are prepared to meet our valuation and the player wants to leave it is very naive to think Palace could wave his current contract in his face and say you're going nowhere. Keeping a player against his will means you miss out twice. You miss out on the best version of that player (because he's sulking) and you miss out on the money. Then you get a lower offer when he finally leaves because his contract has run down and his performances have been less than his usual standard.
Has nothing to do with lacking ambition

I know what you are saying, but Eze is a strange fish, the massive church influence in his life, Money and Fame might not be his God, If i were him i would wait until Real Madrid, Barcelona or even better PSG, like a Sunday league with a few Champions league games

“That’s a joke son, I say, that’s a joke.” “Nice boy, but he’s sharp as a throw pillow.” “He’s so dumb he thinks a Mexican border pays rent” “ “Son… I say, son, some people are so narrow minded they can look through a keyhole with both eyes.”__ Forhorn Leghorn

He's 26!! I don't think that's young in football player terms.

Sorry, I didn't read where you wrote that.

This is bang on. City under Pep is the WORST place a player like Eze could go. All the creativity will be coached out of him. He needs freedom. Spurs under Ange would be a far better move I reckon. He'd flourish there.