This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
We'd need to ensure his legs still work and that being the case I'd have him back even if it's as an off the bench impact player. Wages also need to be modest.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Massive no thanks
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
It's also a no from me. We've moved on and so did he.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Provided a deal could be worked that had very little financial impact upon us (beyond paying him reasonable wages) and perhaps his acceptance that he won't be first name on the team sheet/our singular star man, I'd be delighted. Probably more sentimental than anything but he's only 31, and he's still our Wilf. That's just my personal stance.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
At least if he does come back, the people who own the house with his Muriel splattered on the side of it can put off the emulsion job for another year
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by monkey
At least if he does come back, the people who own the house with his Muriel splattered on the side of it can put off the emulsion job for another year It could be an emulsional return though. (I love a good malapropism and a good pun).
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by YT
It could be an emulsional return though. (I love a good malapropism and a good pun). Whatever way you ‘paint’ it up, I dropped a bollock there
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Come home Wilf there's a house waiting for you at the top of the Holmesdale Road May not have the pace he had but can still run rings around defenders. He's only 31 not 41 ffs lol
If I agreed with you we'd both be wrong |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
A yes from me if on lower wages. He's still versatile and can do a decent job. He's also going to be far more lethal than Edouard and frankly I'd feel a little sick seeing him at West Ham or somewhere else. He's been brilliant for Palace and the romantic ending to his career would be special no matter what others may think.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Massive yes from me. If Mateta can shine under Glasner then surely Wilf would do too. A lot of people with short memories on here saying no. Yes Wilf got stroppy in his last few years with us you would too with the stifling football we played at times. He played under some average managers during her tenure and managed to shine. Yes he's older now but still managed nine league goals in Turkey plus his Champions League goals. He'd still play a big part for us.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Down to Glasner,to decide whether he can work with a Club legend,although it's worth the risk as far as I'm concerned.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Not sure he would adapt to OGs tactics, but he might. What we pay him is a big Question mark, as it has to not unbalance the existing wage structure by reinstating him as the prima donna . Having said all this a fit happy Wilf is tempting. , and better with us than against.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.