This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
So following your logic. If a murder takes place and the culprit is successful in hiding any evidence, then it is not a murder but just a conspiracy? Many people, mostly Black, thought that OJ Simpson was innocent, and he was aquitted by a jury. Does that mean that he didn't do it? Your reasoning is two dimentional. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (19 May 2024 6.40pm) It’s not myself who needs to think harder because that reasoning is illogical. The murder wouldn’t be a conspiracy theory if there is evidence to prove the victim was deliberately killed. It would be a fact. Why any jury acquits has no bearing on this. Who the murderer was remains unproven until enough evidence is presented to convict. The murder remains a fact.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by eagleman13
Yup, this IS, another Wisbech thread, where he knows better than everyone. Sad really. Indeed. These particular threads take me back to my school day playground, where the irritating little ‘know it all’ kid would argue with anyone about anything - literally sucking the life out of interesting topics, regardless. Very sad.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
His logic doesn't progress past CNN buzzwords and talking points so the fact you nailed him here makes no difference to him at all. Agreed. I think the best thing would be for everyone to simply not respond to any of the postings however provocative they are.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Agreed. I think the best thing would be for everyone to simply not respond to any of the postings however provocative they are. He lives for the negative attention. You are right of course and when there's an ignore button it'll be more healthy.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
It's somewhat telling that since this PM under went this serious attempt on his life....who knows just how serious.....there has been no mention of the serious threat of left wing extremism from the mainstream outlets who are more than willing to talk about threats from the right. How strange....almost as though they only want set narratives.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It’s not myself who needs to think harder because that reasoning is illogical. The murder wouldn’t be a conspiracy theory if there is evidence to prove the victim was deliberately killed. It would be a fact. Why any jury acquits has no bearing on this. Who the murderer was remains unproven until enough evidence is presented to convict. The murder remains a fact. You are making yourself look foolish Wisbech. I notice this morning that the Iranian President has been killed in a helicopter crash. Very interesting timing wouldn't you say? I'm sure it was just an accident. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (20 May 2024 7.56am)
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You are making yourself look foolish Wisbech. I notice this morning that the Iranian President has been killed in a helicopter crash. Very interesting timing wouldn't you say? I'm sure it was just an accident. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (20 May 2024 7.56am) The only people who are foolish are those prepared to believe evidence free conspiracy theories. It’s only to be expected that such people, having distorted vision themselves, think that others appear foolish. My wife is an eye specialist. May she can offer some advice? I read the story of the helicopter crash and instinctively looked for evidence of it not being an accident, as that would fit the narrative. It’s very early days yet but so far I cannot see any. It apparently happened in a remote area in heavy fog so an accident seems the most likely explanation. A missile attack in a remote location seems improbable and along with a bomb would leave evidence, which would be discovered by crash investigation. Sabotage is possible but again would probably be found by the investigators. Right now we don’t know and may never know. What we do know is that anyone who thinks they are sure about the cause is being foolish.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
The only people who are foolish are those prepared to believe evidence free conspiracy theories. It’s only to be expected that such people, having distorted vision themselves, think that others appear foolish. My wife is an eye specialist. May she can offer some advice? I read the story of the helicopter crash and instinctively looked for evidence of it not being an accident, as that would fit the narrative. It’s very early days yet but so far I cannot see any. It apparently happened in a remote area in heavy fog so an accident seems the most likely explanation. A missile attack in a remote location seems improbable and along with a bomb would leave evidence, which would be discovered by crash investigation. Sabotage is possible but again would probably be found by the investigators. Right now we don’t know and may never know. What we do know is that anyone who thinks they are sure about the cause is being foolish. Absolutely. There is however plenty of 'evidence' for the Kennedy assassination being a conspiracy. But if you are expecting a video of several men shooting him or a note that says 'we did it' you will be out of luck. Any physical evidence would be 'lost', excused away or simply ignored. That is how conspiracies work. Please try not to be so daft. Being deliberately obtuse is very tedious. It's possible that a helicopter crashed due to the conditions, but anyone who was not suspicious of foul play in these circumstances should certainly never join the police force.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Absolutely. There is however plenty of 'evidence' for the Kennedy assassination being a conspiracy. But if you are expecting a video of several men shooting him or a note that says 'we did it' you will be out of luck. Any physical evidence would be 'lost', excused away or simply ignored. That is how conspiracies work. Please try not to be so daft. Being deliberately obtuse is very tedious. It's possible that a helicopter crashed due to the conditions, but anyone who was not suspicious of foul play in these circumstances should certainly never join the police force. If you have evidence of the JFK assassination being a conspiracy I suggest it is delivered to the authorities asap. However, I doubt that anyone has such evidence. All they have are rumours and assertions. Tonnes of rumours and assertions, repeatedly made and believed by millions doesn’t convert them into evidence. It just means there is a widely held belief in a conspiracy theory. It cannot be anything else, no matter how often it is claimed to be.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
If you have evidence of the JFK assassination being a conspiracy I suggest it is delivered to the authorities asap. However, I doubt that anyone has such evidence. All they have are rumours and assertions. Tonnes of rumours and assertions, repeatedly made and believed by millions doesn’t convert them into evidence. It just means there is a widely held belief in a conspiracy theory. It cannot be anything else, no matter how often it is claimed to be. What evidence would you be hoping for in a case like the Kennedy assination?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What evidence would you be hoping for in a case like the Kennedy assination? Anything that is verifiable as authentic proof of how and why it happened. Which given the elapsed time could now be difficult to obtain. By the way if evidence did exist that proved your contentions then it would certainly have reached a media outlet prepared to publish it. There are many who would revel in such a scoop. They already enjoy publishing all the conspiracy theories.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
If you have evidence of the JFK assassination being a conspiracy I suggest it is delivered to the authorities asap. However, I doubt that anyone has such evidence. All they have are rumours and assertions. Tonnes of rumours and assertions, repeatedly made and believed by millions doesn’t convert them into evidence. It just means there is a widely held belief in a conspiracy theory. It cannot be anything else, no matter how often it is claimed to be. No irony in the constant suggestion that conspiracy theories are the result of some malign outside influence is itself a conspiracy theory.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.