This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Sansbup
It would make a lot of sense for everyone if he signed for either City or Chelsea and was immediately loaned back to us for this season. He would get regular match time, keep him in the frame for France, get a dream move, and it would certainly help us. Win/win, always good. If he went to Chelsea wouldn't the Hall loan deal stop that happening?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
If there is a £35m release clause do we have to accept it or can we go for a bidding war between Chelsea, City and others, just curious.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by CPFC1965
If there is a £35m release clause do we have to accept it or can we go for a bidding war between Chelsea, City and others, just curious. Depends what it says, and we are not about to find out. Edited by dreamwaverider (08 Aug 2023 11.22pm)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by dreamwaverider
Depends what it says, and we are not about to find out. Edited by dreamwaverider (08 Aug 2023 11.22pm) Thanks for this. So if Chelsea offer the release clause but City offer double that too bad for Palace if Olise prefers Chelsea, presumably. Also, do you know whether there is any limit on when bids can be made and Olise confirming his choice? 11:59 p.m. on deadline day would not be ideal
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by pssguy
Thanks for this. So if Chelsea offer the release clause but City offer double that too bad for Palace if Olise prefers Chelsea, presumably. Also, do you know whether there is any limit on when bids can be made and Olise confirming his choice? 11:59 p.m. on deadline day would not be ideal Like any transfer, right up to the deadline.Release clauses are not good for selling clubs for this reason. We could suddenly be left in the lurch at the very last minute of transfer deadline. However, they do get you players in cheap initially. It works better for nimble fast moving clubs in the transfer market, which judging by our history, we are not. Fingers crossed, firstly Olise injury will worry clubs to strike, but secondly and more importantly Im hoping the rumour that the release clause was removed is factual. it was definitely rumoured this time last year. If there is no release clause in place, we would be well advised to keep him this coming season, then look to out him next summer for top dollar. As a club, we tend to hang on to our players too long and let them leave for nothing at the end of their contracts which is obviously bad business. The exception is of course wan Bassaka. But who am i to say? Overall Parish has worked wonders for us as Chairman so far.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Parish's business model was total give run of the mill, competent (mainly) professionals a decent wage at a club where all they had to do was ensure PL football. These players weren't going to be picked up by top 6 clubs unless they did something truly exceptional, and so they had it good at the Palace as long as they did the job. Edited by southnorwoodhill (09 Aug 2023 7.59am)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by southnorwoodhill
Parish's business model was total give run of the mill, competent (mainly) professionals a decent wage at a club where all they had to do was ensure PL football. These players weren't going to be picked up by top 6 clubs unless they did something truly exceptional, and so they had it good at the Palace as long as they did the job. You attract the young talent if they see you as a stepping stone to the elite, as you close the gap to the elite (not an instant thing) players will choose to stay. Edited by Bearcage (09 Aug 2023 7.56am)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Bearcage
You attract the young talent if they see you as a stepping stone to the elite, as you close the gap to the elite (not an instant thing) players will choose to stay. Edited by Bearcage (09 Aug 2023 7.56am) Indeed, and that is Parish's dilemma. He just doesn't have the monetary resources to push this project on.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
"So the Michael Olise release clause ... understand that it is actually slightly more than £35m that has been widely quoted and is also complicated by some slightly unusual terms set by player. They include Olise being able to turn down a move even if the clause is triggered" Ed Aarons [Tweet Link]
I am not a bot. No, seriously, I'm not. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
It is interesting.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Beger
"So the Michael Olise release clause ... understand that it is actually slightly more than £35m that has been widely quoted and is also complicated by some slightly unusual terms set by player. They include Olise being able to turn down a move even if the clause is triggered" Ed Aarons [Tweet Link] What's unusual about that, you can't force a player to leave release clause or not.
One more point |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Beger
"So the Michael Olise release clause ... understand that it is actually slightly more than £35m that has been widely quoted and is also complicated by some slightly unusual terms set by player. They include Olise being able to turn down a move even if the clause is triggered" Ed Aarons [Tweet Link] 1. This confirms Hodgson's statement that it was Olise's decision whether to stay or go.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.