This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Team for Wolves
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Bholl85  Guildford 28 Jan 21 7.10pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by doombear
For me, it's more a case of who I DON'T want to see playing on Saturday. I shall feel reasonably happy if the following DON'T start
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
sprites  Auckland 28 Jan 21 7.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Butland Clyne-Tomkins-Cahill-PVA (quicker to deal with Traore) Ayew-Eze-Wilf Batshuayi (usually prefer CB, but hopefully scoring against WH will give bats some confidence.)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| EddieMac 28 Jan 21 7.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by doombear
It sure is but completely different formation. Take out Townsend and you could argue that all all our best available players started against West Ham, but in the wrong formation. I don’t blame Roy for our weak squad but he is at fault for playing them in the wrong formation. Edited by EddieMac (28 Jan 2021 7.20pm) Edited by EddieMac (28 Jan 2021 7.22pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rachid Rachid Rachid 28 Jan 21 7.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
VG Tomkins over Cahill if fit but a fractured eye socket think that's unlikely. Would have preferred reverting to 4-3-3 some time back but mindful that Zaha has cut a less frustrated figure since being given more freedom and goals.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Fatherken 28 Jan 21 8.08pm |
|
|---|---|
|
we will need a player up front and in defence that can head a ball , therefor we must play Benteke
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rachid Rachid Rachid 28 Jan 21 8.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Fatherken
we will need a player up front and in defence that can head a ball , therefor we must play Benteke I did think that as I was typing, that the team looked lacking in height, but I'm sick to death of watching the fraud Benteke.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 28 Jan 21 10.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
You want to stick with the same team that just lost abjectly, and you advocate simply playing experience. We've been doing that all season. Enjoying it? I hardly need to say the old adage about trying exactly the same thing over and over again. And yes, I would play a 16 year old if he was good enough. However, obviously not my place to say - merely adding to the debate. Not sure what your problem is but carry on! You basically sound like a press conference with Roy. Not once have I said that we should stick with the same team. Not your place to say if a 16 year old is good enough, and yet you '' guaranteed '' he can pass better than our existing midfield...just one small problem - you haven't seen him play. If i do have a problem it's when I read people that - in my humble opinion - are spouting bollix.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 28 Jan 21 11.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NEILLO
Not once have I said that we should stick with the same team. Not your place to say if a 16 year old is good enough, and yet you '' guaranteed '' he can pass better than our existing midfield...just one small problem - you haven't seen him play. I suspect many on HOL have formed this conclusion about my contributions to the debate ! Apropos Wolves they always used to play with a back 3 and 2 wing-backs but in more recent matches they have fielded a back 4.Last night against Chelsea they fielded a '3' and it remains to be seen what formation they deploy on Saturday.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Palace Passion Bromley, South London 28 Jan 21 11.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Clyne--Tomkins--Cahill--Mitchell Riedewald--McArthur Ayew------Eze------Zaha Mateta
|||||||||||P|A|L|A|C|E||||||||||| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| NEILLO Shoreham-by-Sea 28 Jan 21 11.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I suspect many on HOL have formed this conclusion about my contributions to the debate ! Apropos Wolves they always used to play with a back 3 and 2 wing-backs but in more recent matches they have fielded a back 4.Last night against Chelsea they fielded a '3' and it remains to be seen what formation they deploy on Saturday. And I have no doubt that the same is thought of mine by some, maybe all !
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| babylonjohn St Leonards-on-Sea 28 Jan 21 11.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
I suspect many on HOL have formed this conclusion about my contributions to the debate ! Apropos Wolves they always used to play with a back 3 and 2 wing-backs but in more recent matches they have fielded a back 4.Last night against Chelsea they fielded a '3' and it remains to be seen what formation they deploy on Saturday. We however will stick rigidly to our 442 and Wolves will know exactly what to expect and exactly how to beat us as they always seem to. An easy 3 points for them as we slide slowly down the table.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 28 Jan 21 11.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by NEILLO
And I have no doubt that the same is thought of mine by some, maybe all ! Certainly not by 'Yours truly'.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.