This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Is SP going to give a comment on all transfer rumours going forward ? Seems a little odd !
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Yes seems strange for SP to comment on transfer speculation unlike him to do so.Think there must be a bit of a poker game going on with Us Sheff Utd and Liverpool ?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Parish has only denied make a formal or informal bid.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Putitout
My problem with this deal is not Brewster,s ability. But what seems to be the widely reported conditions Liverpool are putting in to it. A buy back. And a sell on. And £20 mill. THIS
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by PatrickA
Parish has only denied make a formal or informal bid. You honestly think Parish would come out and comment on this if we are actually interested. How many times would he have had an opportunity to do this before? Doest make sense. This has actually never added up to me. Last season when we were linked with Brewster Roy said we wouldnt be able to offer game time to a young player such as him.. not sure Roy would have changed his mind. yes I know hes scored some championship goals last season. I think this has put to bed any rumours we had interest in him. Of course I could be wrong, I am no ITK.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
you can spin the denial several ways: 1. Face value, we were never interested.
One more point |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
you can spin the denial several ways: 1. Face value, we were never interested. Good summary. And the answer is: 3!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Spoke to a Liverpool fan (from Liverpool who goes to games).
Following Palace since 25 Feb 1978 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Maybe Benteke 2
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
SP said it was pure fabrication from START to FINISH. To me that says that even our interest is potentially complete BS. The clever move when it comes to Brewster is a loan deal with an option to buy. As exciting as his potential future may seem, £25m for a player who’s had little time to show how consistent he can be is a risk for a club our size.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by kevlee
Spoke to a Liverpool fan (from Liverpool who goes to games). It does sound a bit unlikely that we would be prepared to pay that kind of money for a striker who has done ok in the championship but nothing more although having said that we paid a lot more for Eze than I thought we would.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Ha, just seen that Parish has spoken out again on Twitter. Just like I (and probably others) were saying, Sky's 'correction' earlier was a typically weak retraction and just acted like they had jumped the gun on an offer for Brewster as opposed to the complete fabrication that it was. SP has just tweeted this: [Tweet Link]
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.